 |
 |
 |
Other
Editors as gatekeepers of responsible science
Ana Marusic
orcid.org/0000-0001-6272-0917
; Coeditor in Chief, Croatian Medical Journal and Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split, Split, Croatia
| Fulltext: english, pdf (102 KB) | pages 282-287 | cite | |
|
APA 6th Edition Marusic, A. (2010). Editors as gatekeepers of responsible science. Biochemia Medica, 20 (3), 282-287. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/59287 MLA 8th Edition Marusic, Ana. "Editors as gatekeepers of responsible science." Biochemia Medica, vol. 20, no. 3, 2010, pp. 282-287. https://hrcak.srce.hr/59287. Accessed 21 Jul. 2019. Chicago 17th Edition Marusic, Ana. "Editors as gatekeepers of responsible science." Biochemia Medica 20, no. 3 (2010): 282-287. https://hrcak.srce.hr/59287 Harvard Marusic, A. (2010). 'Editors as gatekeepers of responsible science', Biochemia Medica, 20(3), pp. 282-287. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/59287 (Accessed 21 July 2019) Vancouver Marusic A. Editors as gatekeepers of responsible science. Biochemia Medica [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2019 July 21];20(3):282-287. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/59287 IEEE A. Marusic, "Editors as gatekeepers of responsible science", Biochemia Medica, vol.20, no. 3, pp. 282-287, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/59287. [Accessed: 21 July 2019] |
|||
Abstracts
Journal article is the best publicly visible documentation of research activity so that fraud or misconduct in science is often first discovered in scientific journals. Journal editors are responsible for the integrity of the record they publish in their journals, but they may often find it dificult to ensure the full integrity of the published work, particularly if they work in small scientific communities. The support for editors is provided by the larger editorial community and well-developed guidelines for good publishing practice. Particularly useful for editors are the guidelines from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the largest editorial organization dealing with actual ethical problems of journal editors. COPE has developed ethics 0 ow charts – algorithms for editors to follow when they have an ethical problem in their journals. These charts provide also important information for authors about what they may expect from journal editors as gatekeepers not only of good science but of responsible science.
Keywords
editorial policies; publishing; scientific misconduct; plagiarism; clinical trial
Hrčak ID: 59287
URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/59287
My profile