APA 6th Edition Neumar, R.W. (2010). From Science to Guidelines: The Future for Resuscitation. Signa vitae, 5 (Suppl. 1), 10-12. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/59427
MLA 8th Edition Neumar, Robert W.. "From Science to Guidelines: The Future for Resuscitation." Signa vitae, vol. 5, br. Suppl. 1, 2010, str. 10-12. https://hrcak.srce.hr/59427. Citirano 30.03.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition Neumar, Robert W.. "From Science to Guidelines: The Future for Resuscitation." Signa vitae 5, br. Suppl. 1 (2010): 10-12. https://hrcak.srce.hr/59427
Harvard Neumar, R.W. (2010). 'From Science to Guidelines: The Future for Resuscitation', Signa vitae, 5(Suppl. 1), str. 10-12. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/59427 (Datum pristupa: 30.03.2020.)
Vancouver Neumar RW. From Science to Guidelines: The Future for Resuscitation. Signa vitae [Internet]. 2010 [pristupljeno 30.03.2020.];5(Suppl. 1):10-12. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/59427
IEEE R.W. Neumar, "From Science to Guidelines: The Future for Resuscitation", Signa vitae, vol.5, br. Suppl. 1, str. 10-12, 2010. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/59427. [Citirano: 30.03.2020.]
Sažetak The periodic development and publication of treatment guidelines is integral to the field of cardiopulmonary resuscitation
and emergency cardiovascular care. The methods for guideline development have evolved over the past few decades, and
the process itself has become the subject of increasing scientific investigation. An internationally validated tool for assessing
the quality of clinical practice guidelines is The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument.
Applying this tool to the ILCOR 2010 International Consensus on CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and ECC (emergency
cardiac care) Science with Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR) and the resulting member council guidelines will be a
valuable initial step in evaluating both the process and the product. By doing so, important strengths can be recognized
as well as opportunities for improvement moving forward. Beyond validated tools to assess and improve the quality of the
traditional guidelines process, a critical reassessment of the overall strategy for improving cardiac arrest outcomes is indicated.
From the lay-provider perspective, innovative approaches to facilitate performance of bystander CPR are needed.
This is likely to entail more individualized instructional methods that are titrated to the provider’s capabilities for learning
and performance. What the future might hold for professional providers is a more individualized treatment strategy titrated
to real-time physiologic monitoring with mechanized delivery of therapies guided by real-time computer-aided medical
decision-making. These individualized instructional and treatment strategies could revolutionize our approach to cardiac
arrest resuscitation, and dramatically change how guidelines are developed, implemented and evaluated.