hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak
https://doi.org/10.2498/cit.1001925

Research Quality Matters

Ray J. Paul ; Department of Information Systems and Computing, Brunel University, West London, United Kingdom

Puni tekst: engleski, pdf (130 KB) str. 401-406 preuzimanja: 225* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Paul, R.J. (2010). Research Quality Matters. Journal of computing and information technology, 18 (4), 401-406. https://doi.org/10.2498/cit.1001925
MLA 8th Edition
Paul, Ray J.. "Research Quality Matters." Journal of computing and information technology, vol. 18, br. 4, 2010, str. 401-406. https://doi.org/10.2498/cit.1001925. Citirano 25.06.2019.
Chicago 17th Edition
Paul, Ray J.. "Research Quality Matters." Journal of computing and information technology 18, br. 4 (2010): 401-406. https://doi.org/10.2498/cit.1001925
Harvard
Paul, R.J. (2010). 'Research Quality Matters', Journal of computing and information technology, 18(4), str. 401-406. doi: https://doi.org/10.2498/cit.1001925
Vancouver
Paul RJ. Research Quality Matters. Journal of computing and information technology [Internet]. 2010 [pristupljeno 25.06.2019.];18(4):401-406. doi: https://doi.org/10.2498/cit.1001925
IEEE
R.J. Paul, "Research Quality Matters", Journal of computing and information technology, vol.18, br. 4, str. 401-406, 2010. [Online]. doi: https://doi.org/10.2498/cit.1001925

Sažetak
This paper discusses issues that arise when considering what is meant by the expression ‘research quality’ in universities. Popular measures of research quality are often based on determining the quality of a published journal paper, or of using these to publish journal league tables based on the assumption that the journal quality
represents the quality of the papers published by the journal. This paper argues that measuring the quality of a research publication cannot be done. Therefore a journal league table also has no meaning. The issue of the use of the surrogate of Journal League Tables is used to exemplify some of the issues that need to be addressed by the community to avoid the inequality quality trap. A
number of suggestions are made to establish a sounder basis for dealing with real quality properly. This is not an information systems crisis paper or similar nonsense, but one possible positive way forward.

Ključne riječi
information systems; quality; publishing; good practice

Hrčak ID: 63911

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/63911

Posjeta: 360 *