https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/eujap <p>The European Journal of Analytic Philosophy (EuJAP) aims at providing a forum for philosophical exchange among philosophers from diverse fields within the analytic tradition broadly conceived. EuJAP is open to a broad spectrum of issues ranging from ethics, epistemology, and metaphysics. However, the editorial policies of EuJAP also aim at is bridging the gap between sciences and humanities. One of the goals includes publishing articles that cross traditional disciplinary barriers, either by relying on scientific methodologies, data, and paradigms to ground arguments within a philosophical debate or by using philosophical tools to analyse and illuminate debates that might be deemed as falling outside the scope of academic philosophy.</p> en-US mjurjako@uniri.hr (Marko Jurjako) mia.biturajac@gmail.com (Mia Biturajac) Tue, 22 Dec 2020 21:07:29 +0100 OJS 3.2.1.4 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/eujap/article/view/13482 <div> <p class="Body"><em><span lang="EN-US">The recent global pandemic has led to a shift to online conferences in philosophy. In this paper we argue that online conferences, more than a temporary replacement, should be considered a sustainable alternative to in-person conferences well into the future. We present three arguments for more online conferences, including their reduced impact on the environment, their enhanced accessibility for groups that are minorities in philosophy, and their lower financial burdens, especially important given likely future reductions in university budgets. We also present results from two surveys of participants who attended one large and three small online philosophy conferences this year. We show that participants were in general very satisfied with presentations and discussions at the conferences, and that they reported greater accessibility. This indicates that online conferences can serve as a good alternative to in-person conferences. We also find that networking was less satisfactory in online conferences, indicating a point for improvement and further research. In general, we conclude that philosophers should continue to organize online conferences after the pandemic. We also provide some advice for those wishing to organize online conferences.</span></em></p> </div> Rose Trappes, Daniel Cohnitz ; , Viorel Pâslaru, T. J. Perkins, Ali Teymoori Copyright (c) 2020 Rose Trappes, Daniel Cohnitz ; , Viorel Pâslaru, T. J. Perkins, Ali Teymoori https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/eujap/article/view/13482 Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0100