A Monte Carlo study on the size and power of panel unit root tests: Limitations in small data sets
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to explore the properties of various panel unit root tests in terms of their power and size regarding different panel data structures, with a special focus on small data samples. In particular, different values of the cross-sectional and time dimensions for both heterogeneous and homogeneous data settings with intercept and with and without time trend are observed. We examine and compare the results of five commonly used first-generation panel unit root tests: Levin, Lin and Chu test, Im Pesaran and Shin test, Harris–Tzavalis test, Breitung test and a Fischer type test. The results are derived using Monte Carlo simulations and show that all the observed panel unit root tests suffer from a serious lack of power and tend to either over or under reject the null hypothesis when the time dimensions are small. It is evident that the results of conducting panel unit root tests for data with $T<30$ are erroneous and unreliable, and it is therefore concluded that panel unit root tests should not be conducted for such samples in the first place. This is even more pronounced when there is a time trend or heterogeneity.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2023-12-19 (2)
- 2023-12-19 (1)
Issue
Section
License
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).