THE POSSIBILITY OF DIRECT APPLICATION OF DIRECTIVES IN THE CASE PRACTICE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF MONTENEGRO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/7100Abstract
Analysis of the practice of the Constitutional Court of Montenegro in the last few years shows an evident increase in the number of cases in which the applicant is asking for an assessment of the compatibility of national legislative acts with the Constitution of Montenegro, asking for annulment because of alleged incompatibility with a certain EU directive. Therefore, this article discusses one of the most interesting questions which countries in the process of the accession to the European Union are facing – the status of the sources of EU law in the legal system of candidate countries before they become members of the European Union. In this context, the authors will examine the case law of the Constitutional Court of Montenegro related to situations where the Montenegrin legislator has transposed a directive into the domestic legal order. After comparative analysis, the article will shed more light on the subject stances and will discuss possible solutions depending on the facts of the case when the principle of the direct application of directives can be established.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 EU and comparative law issues and challenges series
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright on the papers published in the Journal, but grant the right of first publication to the Journal. Papers accepted for publication or already published in ECLIC of the Faculty of Law in Osijek may be published by the author(s) in other publications only with proper notice of its previous publication in ECLIC.