Aspect Regarding the Design of Active Strategies for Venture Capital Financing – the Flexible Adjustment for Romania as a Frontier Capital Market

Authors

  • Gabriela Prelipcean University “Stefan cel Mare of Suceava, Romania
  • Mircea Boscoianu Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania

Keywords:

venture capital fund VCF, innovative start-up projects, business plan, active selection

Abstract

Industry 4.0 revolution find a real interest of entrepreneurs but in the case of frontier and emerging markets it is difficult to find a reliable source of long-term financing. The decoupling of the technological evolution from the evolution of the access to financing capacities must be analysed from different point of view (financial, legislative, socio- technical). In Romania, as a frontier market there are only few alternative investment solutions capable to respond to the long-term financing demand of performant projects. The main interest is to understand the strategies for adaptation of venture capital fund (VCF) at real conditions. Venture capital funds (VCF) represents a particular form of private equity investments, scale down and more focused on innovative start-up (or even expansions on technology or markets) projects (the typical value is 10 mil Euro). This form of investments is a personalized response to the general problem related to the actors that do not have tangible assets for collaterals and / or cannot demonstrate the ability to make a profit. In the case of VCF, as a vehicle oriented on innovation and technology, the business plan represents the main element for project portfolio selection in the context of matching the interests of investors with the interests of financed firm’s managers. This contribution is especially important for the case of frontier and emerging markets characterized by additional restrictions (access to strategies, liquidity problems, and agency costs beyond a simple monitoring). For Romania, it is essential to adapt VCF investors' objectives to all phases (selection, evaluation, contract signing and restructuring, progress monitoring, stimulating value-added and, especially, closing the VCF cycle) to real conditions and considering the performance indicators balancing with the value creation mechanisms specific of industry 4.0.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

Adner, R., Levinthal, D. (2004), “What is not a real option: considering boundaries for the application of real options to business strategy”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 29, No. 1.

Adner, R. (2007), “Real options and resources reallocation process”, in Reuer, J., Tong, T. (Eds.), Real Options Theory, Advances in Strategic management, Vol. 24, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 363-372.

Amram, M., Kulatilaka, N. (1999), Real options: managing strategic investment in an uncertain world, Harward Business School, Boston, MA.

Alhorr, H. S., Moore, C., Payne, T. (2008), “The Impact of Economic Integration on Cross- border Venture Capital Investments: Evidence from the European Union”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 897-917.

Amit, R., Brander, J., Zott, C. (1998), “Why Do Venture Capital Firms Exist? Theory and Canadian Evidence”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 441-446.

Anson, M. J. P. (2008), The handbook of alternative assets, 3rd edition, Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons.

Bekaert, G., Harvey, C. (2003), "Research in Emerging Markets Finance: Looking to the future", Emerging Markets Review, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 429-448.

Bergemann, D., Hege, U. (1998), “Venture capital financing, moral hazard, and learning”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 22, No. 6-8, pp. 703-735.

Boscoianu, M., Prelipcean, G., Lupan, M. (2018), “Innovation enterprise as a vehicle for sustainable development - A general framework for the design of typical strategies based on enterprise systems engineering, dynamic capabilities, and option thinking”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 172, pp. 3498-3507.

Boscoianu M., Prelipcean, G., Calefariu, E., Lupan, M. (2015), “Innovative Instruments for SME Financing in Romania - a New Proposal with Interesting Implications on Markets and Institutions”, Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 32, p. 240-255.

Boscoianu, M., Prelipcean, G., Lupan, M. (2013), “Aspects regarding the effectiveness of innovative solutions for early stage SMEs financing in emerging markets”, Management Marketing, Vol. 9, No. 2.

Bottazzi, L., Hellmann, T. (2008), “Who Are the Active Investors? Evidence from Venture Capital”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 488-512.

Bruton, G. D., Chahine, S., Filatotchev, I. (2009), “Founders, Private Equity Investors, and Underpricing in Entrepreneurial IPOs”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 909-928.

Coff, R. W., Laverty, K. J. (2001), “Real options in knowledge assets”, Business Horizons, Vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 73-80.

Cumming, D. (2008), “Contracts and Exits in Venture Capital Finance”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 1947-1982.

Dixit, A. K., Dixit, R. K., Pyndyck, R. (1994), Investment under uncertainty, Princeton University Press.

Gompers, P. (1995), “Optimal investing, monitoring and the staging of venture capital”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 1461-1489.

Gompers, P., Lerner, J. (2001), “The Venture Capital Revolution”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 145-168.

Gompers, P., Lerner, J. (2006), The Venture Capital Cycle, MIT Press.

Grenadier, W. (1997), “Investment in technological innovations; an option pricing approach”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 397-416.

Herath, H. S. B., Park, C. S. (2002), “Multi-stage capital investment opportunities as compounded real options”, The Engineering Economist, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 1-27.

Kaplan, S., Stromberg, P. (2009), “Should Investors Bet on the Jockey or the Horse? Evidence from the Evolution of Firms from Early Business Plans to Public Companies”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 75-115.

Kogut, B., Kulatilaka, N. (2001), “Capabilities as real options”, Organization Science, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 744-758.

Prelipcean, G., Boscoianu, M., Lupan, M., Nastase, C. (2014), “Innovative Financing Solutions Based on Venture Capital and Private Equity to Support the Development of Entrepreneurship in Romania”, Transformation in Business and Economics, Vol 13, No. 3C, pp. 331-347.

Prelipcean, G., Boscoianu, M. (2014), “A hybrid framework for SME financing based on the mix between governmental support and the use of a specialized investment fund in the actual context of a slow recovery after crises and turbulences”, Procedia Economics and Finance, pp. 738-745.

Trigeorgis, L. (1996), Real options: managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Downloads

Published

2019-10-31

How to Cite

Prelipcean, G., & Boscoianu, M. (2019). Aspect Regarding the Design of Active Strategies for Venture Capital Financing – the Flexible Adjustment for Romania as a Frontier Capital Market. ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion, 5(1), 155–164. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/entrenova/article/view/13753

Issue

Section

Financial Economics