Evaluating Impact of an Emerging Big Health Data Platform: A Logic Model and Q-Methodology Approach
Keywords:
MIDAS technology, health-based projects, decision support systems, data miningAbstract
Despite advances in technology and medical science, modern health-based projects are open to systemic failure due to many factors. These include I.T. developer’s lack of awareness with regard to end-user needs, poor communication amongst all parties concerned and inappropriate or inadequate tests of the emerging system. Other issues may be external (e.g. political and legal) such as sharing of patient data and issues surrounding consent. The goal of this paper is to take a major health-based European model in current development and explore how it addresses the needs of four institutions in four different countries, and how it will meet their respective needs. The evaluation was designed within a Logic Model, and uses the Framework approach, and Q-Methodology to assess both impact and evaluation. Data will be collected through longitudinal semi-structured interviews and Q-scoring with principal stakeholders and developers at each stage of the project. This approach, recurring interviews with the same key players in the project, will help ensure that there is mutual understanding between I.T. developers and end-users of the system. The final system is meant to provide effective health-based decision support systems for policy makers.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Abouzahra, M. (2011), “Causes of failure in Healthcare IT projects”, in proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advanced Management Science, Vol. 19, IACSIT Press, Singapore, pp. 46-50.
Analytics Engines, “Innovation through industrialisation”, available at: http://www.analyticsengines.com/analytics-engines-xdp/ (22 March 2018)
Diem, K.G. (1997), Measuring impact of education programs, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
Hicks, N. (2017), “Delivering an Outcomes-based NHS: Creating the Right Conditions”, available at: https://www.ohe.org/publications/delivering-outcomes-based-nhs-creating-right-conditions (25 March 2018)
Kellogg, W. K. (2004), Using logic models to bring together planning, evaluation and action: Logic model development guide, Kellog Foundation, Battle Creek, MI.
Kruse, C. S., Goswamy, R., Raval, Y., Marawi, S. (2016), “Challenges and Opportunities of Big Data in Health Care: A Systematic Review”, JMIR Medical Informatics, Vol. 4, No. 4.
Lu, X., Liu, H., Ye, W. (2010), “Analysis failure factors for small & medium software projects based on PLS method”, in proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information Management and Engineering (ICIME), IEEE, Chengdu, China, pp. 676-680.
McKeown, B., Thomas, D. B. (1988), Q Methodology, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
O’Neill, B. (1998), “Money talks: Documenting the economic impact of Extension personal finance programs”, available at:
https://www.joe.org/joe/1998october/a2.php (22 March 2018)
Pinto, J. K., Mandel, S. J. (1990), “The Causes of Project Failure”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 269-276.
Ritchie, J., Lewis, J. (2003), Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers, Sage, London.
