Interaction between Territorial Capital and Family Businesses
Keywords:
territorial capital, family businesses, embedding, interactionAbstract
The purpose of the study is to investigate the interaction between the territorial capital of a region and the family businesses operating there. In order to obtain a comprehensive picture about the interaction between family businesses and certain elements of territorial capital. On one hand, the study is based on the scientific literature of research areas and the previous research. On the other hand, two business studies are demonstrated based on deep interviews with the successors of the family businesses. The study gives an example of the social and cultural impacts of territorial capital on family businesses and the growing power of family businesses in terms of territorial capital. There is a strong interaction between corporate regional involvement and embedding and territorial capital.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Andersen, P. L., Hansen, M. N. (2011), “Class and Cultural Capital—The Case of Class Inequality in Educational Performance”, European Sociological Review, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 607-621.
Anderson, A. R., Jack, S. L., Dodd, S. D. (2005), “The role of family members in entrepreneurial networks: Beyond the boundaries of the family firm”, Family Business Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 135-154.
Borsodi Műhely Kft. (2018a), available at: http://www.borsodimuhely.hu/ (15 April 2018)
Borsodi Műhely Kft. (2018b), available at: http://www.borsodimuhely.hu/content/image/C%C3%A9gismeret%C5%91/borsodi_idovonal_1447x147-01.jpg (18 April 2018)
Claridge, T. (2018), “Explanation of the different levels of social capital”, available at: https://www.socialcapitalresearch.com/levels-of-social-capital/ (15 April 2018)
Csákné Filep, J. (2012), “Family businesses–focusing on succession”, available at: http://phd.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/660/2/Csakne_Filep_Judit_den.pdf (15 April 2018)
Dombi, G., Horváth, Á., Kabai, G., Fodor-Kun, E., Oláh, M., Sápi, Z., Szabó, P., Tóth, B. I. (2017), “A területi tőke és magyarországi dimenziói” (The territorial capital and its Hungarian dimensions), Nyicita Alapítvány, Balatonfűzfő.
Field, J. (2008), Social Capital, 2nd edition, Routledge Publisher, London.
Inc., “Family-Owned Businesses”, available at: https://www.inc.com/encyclopedia/family-owned-businesses.html (15 April 2018)
Konczosné Szombathelyi, M. (2014), “Családi vállalkozások generációváltásának kockázata” (Risk of generational changing among family businesses), in Tompos, A., Ablonczyné, M. L. (Ed.): "A tudomány és a gyakorlat találkozása" (Meeting of science and practice), Kautz Gyula Emlékkonferencia, Electronic format.
Lively Neal, D. (2011), “Social capital and urban crime”, LFB Scholarly Publisher, El Paso, TX.
Nagy, G. D. (2016), Társadalmi tőke és területi kötődés Magyarországon (Social capital and territorial embeddedness in Hungary), Belvedere Meridionale, Szeged.
Oxford Reference, “Overview: cultural capital”, available at: http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095652799 (15 April 2018)
Pieper, T. M., Klein, S. B. (2012), “The Bull-eye: A Systems Approach to Modelling Family Firms”, Family Business Review, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 301-319.
Polster, C., Konczosné Szombathelyi, M. (2017), “Generation change among three Hungarian family businesses”, in Karlovitz, J. T. (Ed.), Essays in Economics and Business Studies, International Research Institute S.R.O., Bratislava, pp. 73-82.
Pricewaterhouse Coopers (2008), “Making a difference - The PricewaterhouseCoopers Family Business Survey 2007/08”, available at: https://www.pwc.com/gr/en/surveys/assets/family-business-2007-2008.pdf (08 July 2018)
Rechnitzer, J. (2016), A területi tőke a városfejlődésben - A Győr-kód (The territorial capital in urban development - The Győr code), Dialóg Campus Kiadó, Budapest-Pécs.
Sullivan, A. (2001), “Cultural Capital and Educational Attainment”, Sociology, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 893-912.
van Staveren, I. (2003), “Beyond Social Capital in Poverty Research”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 415-423.