The Choice of Color, Topic and Toys: An Empirical Study of Gender Roles
Keywords:
target group marketing, product gendering, toys choice, eye-tracking technologyAbstract
Typically, toy manufacturers use the color pink for girls’ toys and the color blue for boys. They also design gender-related theme worlds for girls and boys based on gender-based stereotypes, justified by different playing preferences of the two sexes. Socially-oriented toys such as dolls are meant for girls and non-social toys such as trucks are attributed to boys. In toy shops, early-stage shaping of the gender profile is thus achieved by color and theme design. This early-stage reinforcement and reproduction of gender stereotypes has been criticized because stereotyping can limit further child development and learning. The goal of this article is to examine the contribution of the color-setting and theme design to the perception of toys, the gender-related assignment as well as the preferences for playing with toys. For this purpose, the use of the eye-tracking technology is combined with a questionnaire. In an experiment six pairs of “LEGO®” models, which have been systematically varied in color and theme, are shown to 74 four- and five-year-old children. The results reveal that the original gender-stereotyped “LEGO®” models attract more attention among children than the varied gender-incongruent models. The original “LEGO®” models are clearly assigned to gender. In the case of the varied models, the color is more distinctive than the theme for gender classification and the interest in playing with the models.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Alexander, G. M., Wilcox, T., Woods, R. (2009), “Sex differences in infants` visual interest in toys”, Archives of sexual behavior, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 427-433.
Auster, C. J., Mansbach, C. S. (2012), “The Gender Marketing of Toys - An Analysis of Color and Type of Toy on the Disney Store Website” Sex Roles, Vol. 67, pp. 375-388.
Baacke, D. (1999), Die 0-5 Jährigen – Einführung in die Probleme der frühen Kindheit, Beltz.
Butler, J. (1991), Das Unbehagen der Geschlechter, Suhrkamp.
Cowart, J. O., Darke, P. (2014), “Targeting Miss Daisy: Using age and gender to target unethical sales tactics”, Marketing Letters, Vol. 25, pp. 67-75.
Dammler, A. (2011), Rosa Ritter & schwarze Prinzessinnen Was wirklich "typisch männlich" und "typisch weiblich" ist, Gütersloher Verlagshaus.
Debevec, K., Iyer, E. (1986), “Sex roles and consumer perceptions of promotions, products, and self: What we know and where should we be headed?”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 13, pp. 210-214.
Duchowski, A. T. (2002), „A breath-first survey of eye-tracking applications”, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 455-470.
Eisend, M. (2010), “A meta-analysis of gender roles in advertising”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 418-440.
Escudero, P., Robbins, R. A., Johnson, S. P. (2013), “Sex-related preferences for real and doll faces versus real and toy objects in young infants and adults”, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Vol. 116, pp. 367-379.
Fugate, D. L., Phillips, J. (2010), “Product gender perceptions and antecedents of product gender congruence”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 251-261.
Jadva, V., Hines, M., Golombok, S. (2010), “Infants` preference for toys, colors, and shapes: sex differences and similarities”, Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 39 No. 6, pp. 1261-1273.
Kohlberg, L. (1966), “A cognitive developmental analysis of children's sex-role concepts and attitudes”, in Maccoby, E. (Ed.), The development of sex differences, Stanford, Stanford University Press.
LoBue, V., DeLoache, J. S. (2011), “Pretty in pink: The early development of gender-stereotyped colour preferences”, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, Vol. 29, pp. 656-667.
Nelson, A. (2005), “Children`s Toy Collections in Sweden? A Less Gender-Typed Country?”, Sex Roles, Vol. 52 No. 1-2, pp. 93-102.
Schub von Bossiazky, G. (1992), Psychologische Marketingforschung, Vahlen, München.
Serbin, L. A., Poulin-Dubois, D., Colburne, K. A., Sen, M. G., Eichstedt, J. A. (2001), “Gender stereotyping in infancy - Visual preferences for and knowledge of gender-stereotyped toys in the second year”, International Journal of Behavioral Development, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 7-15.
van Tilburg, M., Lieven, T., Herrmann, A., Townsend, C. (2015), “Beyond “Pink It and Shrink It”: Perceived Product Gender, Aesthetics, and Product Evaluation”, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 422–437.
Weisgram, E. S., Fulcher, M., Dinella, L. M. (2014) “Pink gives girls permission: Exploring the roles of explicit gender labels and gender-typed colors in preschool children`s toy preferences”, Journal of applied Development Psychology, Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 401-409.
West, C., Zimmerman, D. H. (1991), “Doing Gender”, in: Lorber, J., Farell, S. A. (Ed.): The Social Construction of Gender, Sage, pp. 13-37.
Wong, W. I., Hines, M. (2015), “Effects of gender color-coding on toddlers` gender-typical toy play”, Archives of sexual behavior, Vol. 44 No. 5, pp. 1233-1242.
