The Interpretations of Social Innovation and the Helix Models through a System of University Relations
Keywords:
Helix models, innovation, social innovation, university relationsAbstract
According to the triple helix model, the dynamic of the innovation system development of a region or sector is determined by the closeness and intensity of state - company - university collaborations. The fourth spiral assumes the importance of the civil society. The appearance and acceptance of the third and fourth spiral model means the birth of the concept of social innovation and the beginning of its research. The fifth helix, that is the ecological approach, strengthens further the possibility of the interpretation of social innovation as the knowledge-based development, the social, political and civil dimensions can be expanded by the issue of sustainability. In 2015 a research was carried out focusing on the tender and corporate relationships of a major university. It was intended to determine these relationships on the basis of social innovation capabilities and the areas of the helix-s theory were also sought in these interactions. In conclusion, the universities are not only determinative in case of the triple helix model, but they also have an outstanding role in the development of social innovation.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Benedek J., Kocziszky Gy., Veresné Somosi M. , Balaton K. (2015) “Regionál istársadalmi innováció generálása szakértői rend szersegítségével”, Észak-magyaror szági Stratégiai Füzetek XII. évf. (2015/2, p. 8).
Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F. (2012) “Mode 3 knowledge production in a quadruple helix”
Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., Campbell, D. F. (2012) “The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation”, Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, p. 7.
EC (1995) ”European Commission's 1995 Green Paper on Innovation”, available at: http://europa.eu/documents/comm/green_papers/pdf/com95_688_en.pdf(3/5/2016)
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (2000) “The Dynamics of Innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University, Industry and Government Relations”. Research Policy, Vol. 29, Nr. 2.
Etzkowitz, H., Zhou, C. (2006) “Triple Helix twins: innovation and sustainability”. Science and Public Policy, 33. Fourth Community Innovation (2007).
Kotler P. (2004) “Marketing menedzsment”, Budapest, Műszaki K., p. 381.
Lengyel I., Rechnitzer J. (2004) “Regionális gazdaságtan”. Budapest-Pécs, Dialóg Campus, p. 250.
Lundvall, B.-A. (1995) “National Systems of Innovation – Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning”. London, Biddles Ltd., p. 8.
OECD-Eurostat Oslo Kézikönyv (2005) “3. kiad. Párizs. Eredeticím: Oslo Manual Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data”. Third edition, p. 30.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1939) “The Theory of Economic Development”. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Smahó, M. (2008) “A tudás és a regionális fejlődés összefüggései”. Doktoriértekezés, Győr, SzéchenyiIstván Egyetem. p. 58.
