Impacts of EU Enlargement Process: A Gravity Model Approach
Keywords:
EU economic integration, gravity model of trade, panel estimation, economy, researchAbstract
The approach based on the law of gravity for the study of international trade flows has been widely used in recent years. Gravity model based studies have achieved empirical success in explaining various “flows”, for example international trade. Due to simplicity, high explanatory ability and improved econometrics the model is convenient as an examination tool for the researchers. The objective of this research is to provide an overview of the EU enlargement process in the period between 2000 and 2010 by means of a gravity model, as well as to estimate and measure the trade growth as a consequence of the opening up of the trade in the EU. Analysing the trade prospects for the new EU member states is important in the context of European enlargement. My research question is the following: what was the effect of EU enlargement on trade within and outside the EU?
I find that the EU enlargement has large and significant effects on both old and new members' trading activities. Old and new members both increased their exports; new members decreased their imports from the rest of the world. The relevant source of novelty to research lies in the methodology of the econometric model.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Anderson, J. (1979), “A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation”, American Economic Review, Vol. 69 No. 1, pp. 106-116.
Anderson, J. (2010), “The Gravity Model”, NBER Working Paper 16576.
Anderson, J., van Wincoop, E. (2004), ”Trade Cost”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 42.
Anderson, J., Marcouiller, D. (2002), “Insecurity and the Pattern of Trade”: An Empirical Investigation, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 84 No. 2, pp. 342-352.
Anderson, J., van Wincoop, E. (2002), “Borders, Trade, and Welfare”, in: Collins, S.M., Rodrik, D. (Eds.), Brookings Trade Forum, Brookings Institution, pp. 207-244.
Anderson, J., van Wincoop, E. (2003), “Gravity with Gravitas”: A Solution to the Border Puzzle, American Economic Review, Vol. 93, pp. 170-192.
Baier, S. L., Bergstrand, J.H. (2005), “Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members‘ International Trade?”, Federal Reserve of Atlanta, Working Paper 2005/3.
Baier, S.L., Bergstrand, J.H. (2001), “The Growth of the World Trade: Tariffs, Transport Costs, and Income Similarity”, J Int Econ, Vol. 53 No. 1, pp. 1-27.
Bchir, H., Fontagné, L., Zanghieri, P. (2003), ”The Impact of EU Enlargement on Member States”, A CGE Approach, CEPII Working Papers 10, Paris, CEPII.
Buch, C., Piazolo, D. (2001), ”Capital and Trade Flows in Europe and the Impact of Enlargement”, Economic Systems, Vol. 25, pp. 183-214.
Bussière, M., Fidrmuc, J., Schnatz, B. (2005), ”Trade integration of Central and Eastern European countries: lessons from a gravity model”, Working Paper 545, Frankfurt, European Central Bank.
Curran, L., Zignago, S. (2012), ” EU enlargement and the evolution of European production networks”, Research in International Business and Finance, Vol. 26 Np. 2, pp. 240-257.
Gomez, H. (2011), “Comparing alternative methods to estimate gravity models of bilateral trade”, ETSG Conference Proceedings 2011, available at: www.etsg.org (accessed June 3rd 2015).
Dixit, A.K., Stiglitz, J.E. (1977), “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity”, American Economic Review, Vol. 67, pp. 297–308.
Evenett, S., Keller, W. (2002), “On Theories Explaining the Success of the Gravity Equation”, Journal of Political Economy, Univ. of Chicago Press, Vol. 110, pp. 281-316.
Head K., Mayer, T., Thoenig M. (2014), "Welfare and Trade Without Pareto", Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers, pp. 2014-02, Sciences Po Departement of Economics.
Kepaptsoglou, K. Karlaftis M.G, Tsamboulas, D. (2010), “The gravity model specification for modelling international trade flows and free trade agreement effects: a 10-year review of empirical studies”, The Open Economics Journal, Vol. 3, pp. 1-13.
McCallum, J. (1995), “National Borders Matter: Canada-US Regional Trade Patterns”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 85 No. 3, pp. 615-623.
Paas, T. (2003), “Regional Integration and International Trade in the Context of EU Eastward Enlargement”, HWWA Discussion Papers 218, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).
Paas, T., Tafenau, E. (2005), ”Regional Trade Clusters and Their Role in Promoting EU Enlargement”, Transition Studies Review, Vol.1, pp. 77-90.
Pöyhonen, P. (1963), “A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 90 No. 1, pp. 93-99.
Rose, A.K., van Wincoop, E. (2001), “National Money as a Barrier to International Trade: The Real Case for Currency Union”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 91 No. 2, pp. 386-390.
Tinbergen, J. (1962), “Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for and International Economic Policy”, New York, The Twentieth Century Fund.
Wooldridge, J. (2002), “Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data”, USA, MIT.
World Bank (2015), “World Bank Indicators”, available at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator (accessed June 1st 2015).
