Analysis of Overhead Costs Management in Companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54820/ZZRU4894Keywords:
digitalization, organizational behaviour, overhead-costs managementAbstract
The development of overhead costs management is becoming more and more important as the percentage of overhead costs is rising. The last 15 years have demonstrated the awakening of advanced methods and tools aimed at understanding the utilization of overheads better. The paper investigates the current state of overhead costs management using a sample of 20 companies in Austria, Hungary, and Slovakia. A qualitative approach was applied in a multi-case study, which unveiled the significance of overhead cost management with the increasing trend of importance. The effort reflects current innovations using digitalization of processes. The findings show that (1) the majority of the companies indicated that digitalization heavily impacts overhead costs; (2) all expressed their dissatisfaction with the tools currently used; and (3) the majority cited that usability and speed are the predominant factors. The analysis and the subsequent synthesis delivered three theses: (1) perception that digital competence enables overhead costs management; (2) belief that competencies are insufficient; and (3) there are prerequisites for success in overhead costs management. The paper examines the situation in seven industries represented in the sectors of manufacturing and transportation/storage for the time period from 2008 to 2017. The paper concludes with several recommendations for academia, businesses, and future research.
References
Alix Partners (2013), “Five Steps to Sustainable Overhead Cost Management”, available at: https://www.alixpartners.com/insights-impact/insights/five-steps-to-sustainable-overhead-cost-management/ (1st May 2021)
BACH Working Group (2019), “The Bank for the Accounts of Companies Harmonized (BACH) database”, available at: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpsps/ecbsp11.en.pdf (1st May 2021)
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Friese, S. (2018), “Grounded Theory Analysis and CAQDAS : A happy pairing or remodeling GT to QDA ?”, In Bryant, A., Charmaz, K. (Ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory, Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp. 1-37.
Hernández-Santibán͂ez, N., Mastrolia, T. (2019), “Contract Theory in a VUCA World”, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, Vol. 57 No. 4, pp. 3072-3100.
Loy, T. R., Hartlieb, S. (2018), “Have estimates of cost stickiness changed across listing cohorts?”, Journal of Management Control, Vol. 29, pp. 161-181.
Masud, M. (2018), “An Examination of Case Studies in Management Research: A Paradigmatic Bridge”, International Journal of Social Science Studies, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 9-19.
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Miller, J. G., Vollmann, T. E. (1985), “The hidden factory - Cutting the explosive growth of overhead costs requires mastery of more than just what happens on the shop floor”, available at: https://hbr.org/1985/09/the-hidden-factory (1st May 2021)
Novák, P., Dvorský, J., Popesko. B., Strouhal, J. (2017), “Analysis of overhead cost behavior: Case study on decision-making approach”, Journal of International Studies, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 74-91.
Pianta, M., Lucchese, M., Nascia, L. (2019), “Reshaping the economy: an industrial and investment policy in Europe”, in Gabellini, T., Gasperin, S., Moneta, S. (Eds.), Economic Crisis and Economic Thought: Alternative Theoretical Perspectives on the Economic Crisis, Routlege, London, pp. 260-291.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.