An Empirical Study on Inter-Organisational Network Structures for Connected Cars

Authors

  • Fumihiko Isada Kansai University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54820/NVFQ4387

Keywords:

inter-organisational network, business ecosystem, platform leadership, social network analysis, connected car

Abstract

This study aimed to empirically examine whether rapid changes in the technological environment affect inter-organisational relationships. In the automotive industry, the advantage of cohesive and vertically integrated inter-organisational relationships has been pointed out conventionally. The development of connected cars, which can communicate bidirectionally with other systems outside the car, is eliciting significant changes in the traditional automotive products and the industry structure — changes generally associated with the automotive product structure moving closer to IT products. The aim was to empirically clarify what kind of network structure of inter-organisational relations firms are growing with changes in industrial structure by creating a database of actual firm behavior. The database was analyzed using the social network analysis method, and the characteristics of growing firms’ organisational network structure were extracted. Besides the traditional integrated inter-organisational relationships, the results show that there is a mixture of inter-organisational relationships with different characteristics of growth firms.

References

Bonacich, P. (2007), “Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality”, Social networks, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 555-564.

Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., Freeman, L. C. (2002), Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis, Analytic Technologies, Boston.

Burt, R. (1992), Structural holes: The social structure of competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Burt, R. S. (2004), “Structural holes and good ideas”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 110 No. 2, pp. 349-399.

Chesbrough, H., Kusunoki, K. (2001), “The modularity trap: Innovation, technology phase shifts, and the resulting limits of virtual organizations”, in Nonaka, I., Teece, D. (Eds.), Managing Industrial Knowledge, Sage, London, pp. 202-230.

Christensen, C. M. (1997), The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

Freeman, L. C., Roeder, D., Mulholland, R. R. (1979), “Centrality in social networks: II. Experimental results”, Social networks, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 119-141.

Fujimoto, T. (2020), “Critiquing the recent discussions on manufacturing with questionable evidence”, Akamon Management Review, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 159-164.

Gawer, A., Cusumano, M. A. (2002), Platform leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

Granovetter, M. S. (1973), “The strength of weak ties”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78 No. 6, pp. 1360-1380.

Granovetter, M. S. (2005), “The impact of social structure on economic outcomes”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 33-50.

Higuchi, K. (2016), “A two-step approach to quantitative content analysis: KH Coder Tutorial Using Anne of Green Gables (Part I)”, Ritsumeikan Social Science Review, Vol. 52 No. 3, pp. 77-91.

Higuchi, K. (2017), “A two-step approach to quantitative content analysis: KH Coder Tutorial Using Anne of Green Gables (Part II)”, Ritsumeikan Social Science Review, Vol. 53 No. 1, pp. 137-147.

Iansiti, M., Lakhani, K. R. (2017), “Managing our hub economy”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 96 No. 1, pp. 84-92.

Iansiti, M., Levien, R. (2004), The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability, Harvard Business Press, Boston.

Jacobides, M. G. (2019), “In the ecosystem economy, what’s your strategy?”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 97 No. 5, pp. 128-137.

Phelps, C., Heidl, R., Wadhwa, A. (2012), “Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: A review and research agenda”, Journal of Management, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 1115-1166.

Turner, A. (2011), “The Future of the Connected Car”, available at: https://mashable.com/2011/02/26/connected-car/ (23 May 2021)

Ulrich, K. (1995), “The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm”, Research Policy, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 419-440.

Wessel, M., Levie, A., Siegel, R. (2016), “The problem with legacy ecosystems”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 94 No. 11, pp. 68-74.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-29

How to Cite

Isada, F. (2022). An Empirical Study on Inter-Organisational Network Structures for Connected Cars. ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion, 7(1), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.54820/NVFQ4387

Issue

Section

Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth