THIRD PARTY CO-OWNERSHIP OF THE OBJECT OF ENFORCEMENT AS A RIGHT THAT (DOES NOT) PREVENT ENFORCEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/26610Keywords:
third party co-ownership, the exclusive right of the third part, execution on real estate, execution on the movable property, the right to peaceful enjoyment of propertyAbstract
When enforcement is determined on an object that is co-owned by the executor and a third party who is not the executor, domestic and comparative procedural theories identify (only) the concept according to which the co-ownership of the third party represents their exclusive right, starting from the fact that it is natural for a forced settlement enforcement requester to be carried out based on the value of the executor’s property. In addition to the above, two other models are identified in the paper using the normative- dogmatic and comparative law method – the right of co-ownership of the third party on the object of execution, which represents a conditional exclusive right, and their right which is not an exclusive right. The legal-value reach of the identified legal models is examined by analyzing the current domestic and foreign procedural theories, as well as the current domestic judicial practice, and by examining their compatibility with the convention standard of protection of the third party’s right to peaceful enjoyment of property. Since the laws of the entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina accept opposite models regarding this issue, the research aims to point out to the legislators in the entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina the importance of conceptual harmonization as soon as possible. It is concluded that from the identified legal models, the protection of the right to peaceful enjoyment of the property of a third party is provided (only) by the one that envisages the co-ownership of this person as his exclusive right, either on the movable or immovable thing on which enforcement is determined.
References
Allen T, 'Compensation for Property under the European Convention on Human Rights' (2007) 28 2 Michigan Journal of International Law
Breiler J, ‘Die Drittwiderspruchsklage nach § 771 ZPO’ in Zwangsvollstreckungsrecht im Assessorexamen und in der Praxis (Springer-Lehrbuch, 2004)
Brox H i Walker W D, Zwangsvollstreckungsrecht (Franz Vahlen Verlag, 2021)
Bruns A, Baur F i Stürner R, Zwangsvollstreckungsrecht (C.F.Müller, 2006)
Cianciardo J, ‘The Principle of Proportionality: the Challenges of Human Rights' (2010) 3 Journal of Civil Law Studies
Cornol M i Wahlmann C, Zwangsvollstreckungsrecht (Nomos, 2022)
Codina L, 'The IMRaD model: What is it and How can it be Applied to Articles in the Humanities and Social Sciences' (2022) 24 Revista Académica sobre Dokumentación Digital y Comunicación Interactiva
Musielak H J i Voit W, Grundkurs ZPO (C. H. Beck, 2022)
Paulus C, Zivilprozessrecht, Erkenntnisverfahren, Zwangsvollstreckung, und Europäisches Zivilprozessrecht (Springer, 2009)
Petersen J,‘Die Drittwiederspruchsklage' (2018) 10 Juristische ausbildung
Rechberger W i Oberhammer P, Exekutionsrecht (Facultas Verlags- und Buchhandels A G, 2009)
Saccia G, ‘Proportionality and the Balancing of Rights in the Case law of European Courts' (2019) 4 Rivista di diritto pubblico Italiano, Comparato, Europeo
Viglianisi Ferraro A, 'Il diritto di proprietà nella Convenzione europea dei diritti dell`uomo e la necessità di una maggiore tutela dello stesso a livelo nazionale' (2019) 12 3 Revista de Estudios Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito
Aras Kramar S, ‘Zaštita ovršenika u svjetlu novina u ovrsi na nekretnini’ (2017) 33 3-4 Pravni vjesnik
Babić I i Jotanović R, Građansko pravo, knjiga dva, Stvarno pravo (Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci, 2020)
Bodiroga N, ‘Prigovor trećeg lica u izvršnom postupku’ (2006) 54 1 Anali Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu
Bodiroga N, Teorija izvršnog postupka (Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, 2012)
Dojčinović, Daupović A, Obradović R, Povlakić M i Zaćiragić F, Komentar Zakona o izvršnom postupku u Federaciji Bosne i Hercegovine i Republici Srpskoj (Savjet Evrope i Evropska Komisija, 2022)
Jakšić A, Građansko procesno pravo (Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu Pravni fakultet, 2020)
Keča R i Knežević M, Građansko procesno pravo (Službeni glasnik, 2021)
Petrović S, ‘Co-Ownership of the Spouse as a Third Party on Real Estate From the Martial Property as his Right that (does not) Prevent Enforcement’ (2023) u: Dinka Šago i drugi (ur.) Zbornik radova IX međunarodnog savjetovanja 'Aktualnosti građanskog procesnog prava – nacionalna i usporedna pravnoteorijska i praktična dostignuća' ( Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Splitu 2023)
Petrović S, ‘Otklanjanje nepravilnosti učinjenih pri sprovođenju izvršenja’ (2023) 67 Pravna riječ
Petrović S, Dejudicijalizacija sudske funkcije u građanskom izvršnom postupku (doktorska disertacija, 2019)
Poznić B, Građansko procesno pravo (Savremena administracija, 1987)
Prančić V, ‘Uspostava vlasništva posebnoga dijela nekretnine na zahtjev suvlasnika koji ima odgovarajući suvlasnički dio – neka otvorena pitanja’ (2016) 32 3–4 Pravni vjesnik
Račić R, 'Prigovor trećeg lica' (2015) 1320 Privredna štampa
Račić R, Izvršno procesno pravo (Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci, 2021)
Stanković G i Račić R, Vanparnično procesno pravo i pravo izvršenja i obezbjeđenja (Univerzitet Mediteran, Pravni fakultet, 2019)
Stanković G, Palačković D i Trešnjev A, Komentar Zakona o izvršenju i obezbeđenju, sa odabranom sudskom praksom i primerima podnesaka i odluka (Službeni glasnik, 2018)
Stanković M, ‘Pravo na imovinu u jurisprudenciji Evropskog suda za ljudska prava’ (2019) Harmonius
Stojiljković S, ‘Tužba za nedozvoljenost izvršenja trećeg lica iz izvršnog postupka i (ne)adekvatnost zaštite stvarnog prava trećeg lica u pravnom okviru Republike Srbije’ (2020) 9 Harmonius
Triva S, Belajec V i Dika M, Sudsko izvršno pravo opći dio (Informator, 1980)
Hrvatin B, ‘Izlučni prigovor i tužba protiv ovrhe' (2004) Ovrha i stečaj – aktualnosti zakonodavstva i sudske prakse
PROPISI I DOKUMENTI
Zakon o izvršnom postupku (SG RS, 59/2003, 85/2003, 64/2005, 118/2007, 29/2010, 57/2012, 67/2013, 98/2014, 5/2017, 58/2018, 66/2018) (BA)
Zakon o izvršnom postupku (SL FBiH, 32/2009, 52/2003, 33/2006, 39/2006, 39/2009, 35/2012, 46/2016, 42/2018) (BA)
Zakon o izvršnom postupku (SG SFRJ, 20/1978, 6/1982, 74/1987, 57/1989, 20/1990, 27/1990, 35/1991) (YU)
Ovršni zakon (NN, 112/2012, 25/2013, 93/2014, 55/2016, 73/2017, 131/2020, 114/2022) (HR)
Zivilprozessordnung in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 5. Dezember 2005 (BGBl. I S. 3202; 2006 I S. 431; 2007 I S. 1781), poslednji put izmjenjen 22. 2. 2023. (BGBl. 2023 I Nr. 51) (DE)
Zakon o stvarnim pravima (SG RS, 124/2008, 3/2009, 58/2009, 95/2011, 60/2015, 18/2016, 107/2019, 1/2021, 119/2021) (BA)
Zakon o izvršnom postupku (SG RS, 125/2004) (RS)
Pravila Ustavnog suda Bosne i Hercegovine (SG BiH, 94/14-prečišćeni tekst) (BA)
Evropska konvencija o ljudskim pravima i osnovnim slobodama (EKLJP)
PRESUDE I DRUGE ODLUKE
Presuda U 141/06-7 brandenburgški Viši regionalni sud (Brandenburgisches Oberlandesgerichts) (27. 4. 2007.) (DE)
Odluka 57 0 Ps 121870 20 Rev Vrhovni sud Republike Srpske (10. 2.2020.) (BA)
Rješenje 78 0 P 011123 19 Gži 3 Okružni sud u Banjoj Luci (16. 1. 2020.) (BA)
Odluka U-10/19 Ustavni sud Bosne i Hercegovine (6. 2. 2020.) (BA)
Odluka 46 0 Mal 076194 22 Spp Vrhovni sud Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine (8. 12. 2022.) (BA)
Rješenje 65 0 I 162084 10 I Općinski sud u Sarajevu (20. 3. 2020.)
Presuda 11 U 33/04 dizeldorfski Viši regionalni sud (Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf) (16. 3. 2005.) (DE)
Bikić v Hrvatska aplikacija br. 50101/12 (29. 5. 2018.)
Iatridis v Greece aplikacija br. 31107/96 (25. 3. 1999.)
Brezovec v Hrvatska aplikacija br. 13488/07 (29. 3. 2011.)
Sporrong & Lönnroth v Sweden App no. 7151/75 (18. 12. 1984.)
Radanović v Hrvatska aplikacija br. 9056/02 (21. 12. 2006.)
Edwards v Malta App no 17647/04 (24. 10. 2006.)
Broniwoski v Poland App no 31443/96 (22. 6. 2004.)
Scordino v Italy App no 36813/97 (27. 3. 2003.)
James v United Kingdom App no 8793/79 (21. 2. 1986.)
Jeličić v Bosna i Hercegovina aplikacija br. 41183 (31. 10. 2006.)
Burdov v Russia App no 59498/00 (7. 5. 2002.)
Stran Greek Refineries&Stratis Andreadis v Greece App no 13427/87 (9. 12. 1994.)
Zrilić v Hrvatska aplikacija br. 46726/11 (3.10.2015)
Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v Belgium App no 17849/91 (20. 11. 1995.)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Stojana Petrović
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright on the papers published in the Journal, but grant the right of first publication to the Journal. Papers accepted for publication or already published in Pravni vjesnik of the Faculty of Law in Osijek may be published by the author(s) in other publications only with proper notice of its previous publication in Pravni vjesnik.
