FIGHT AGAINST DOPING, GOOD GOVERNANCE, AND EDUCATION: WHAT ARE THE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CZECH OLYMPIC COMMITTEE?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30925/slpdj.1.1.3

Keywords:

Good governance, Doping, Fight against doping, Anti-doping education, Czech Olympic Committee, National Olympic Committee, World Anti-Doping Agency, World Anti-Doping Code

Abstract

This paper researches the roles and responsibilities of National Olympic Committees (NOC), especially the Czech Olympic Committee (Czech NOC), in anti-doping education. Good governance is an increasingly important condition of the self-regulatory autonomy of
anti-doping organizations (ADO) in the European Union (EU). Moreover, the principles of good governance identified by both, the EU bodies and institutions, and the IOC, cover education. In this context, the World Anti-Doping Code (WADC) outlines the educational roles and responsibilities of NOCs. Nevertheless, concrete form and implementation of such roles and responsibilities remain vague and unclear, which may jeopardize NOC’s good governance, integrity, and management in the fight against doping. Therefore, the research objective of this paper is to clarify and establish concrete roles, responsibilities, and strengths of NOCs, particularly the Czech NOC, in anti-doping education. This paper initially reviews the social science research and the existing knowledge on the concrete roles and responsibilities of NOCs. Consequently, it presents the conducted empirical research, employing three main data collection techniques: surveys, interviews, and focus groups. Finally, this paper formulates recommendations and an action plan on how the Czech NOC, and similarly all NOCs, should use their strengths to exercise their roles and responsibilities in anti-doping education effectively and sustainably. It simultaneously suggests how the Czech NOC and other NOCs should plan, implement, and evaluate their education programs to prevent doping in sports and strengthen their good governance in and beyond the EU.

References

Alm Jens. Action for Good Governance in International Sports Organisations (Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Sports Studies, 2013).

Amatya Diwakar Lal. “Anti-Doping Education for Nepalese National and International Athletes.” ICSSPE Bulletin (17285909), Issue 56 (2008), 1-32.

Butryn Ted M., Jay A. Johnson and Matthew A. Masucci. “A Qualitative Examination of Knowledge of Doping and Anti-Doping Education among Elite US and Canadian Female Triathletes.” World Anti-Doping Agency, June 2012, 1-33.

Cléret Léa. “The Role of Anti-Doping Education in Delivering WADA’s Mission.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 3, no.2(2011): 271-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2011.577084.

Efverström Anna, Åsa Bäckström, Nader Ahmadi and David Hoff. “Contexts and conditions for a level playing field: Elite athletes’ perspectives on anti-doping in practice.” Performance Enhancement & Health 5, no. 2(2016): 77-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2016.08.001.

Exner Jan. “Roles and Responsibilities of the Czech Olympic Committee in Anti-Doping Education.” Research project within the Executive Masters in Sport Organisations Management, Université catholique de Louvain, 2021, 1-43.

Exner Jan. “Between Prevention and Repression: Roles and Responsibilities of the Czech Olympic Committee in Anti-Doping Education.” Charles University in Prague Faculty of Law Research Paper, 2, no. 5(2021): 1-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3849247.

Exner Jan. “The Fight against Doping in Sport in Interaction with European Union Law. Proportionality of Ineligibility and Anti-Doping Education.” Ph.D. thesis, Charles University, Faculty of Law, 2022, 1-167.

Geeraert Arnout. The EU in international sports governance: a principal-agent perspective of EU control of FIFA and UEFA (Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016).

Geeraert Arnout and Frank van Eekeren (eds.). Good Governance in Sport. Critical Reflections (London: Routledge, 2022).

Henning April and Paul Dimeo. “Perceptions of Legitimacy, Attitudes and Buy-in Among Athlete Groups: a Cross-National Qualitative Investigation Providing Practical Solutions.” World Anti-Doping Agency, 2019, 1-73.

Hums, Mary A., MacLean, Joanne C. Governance and Policy in Sport Organizations (New York: Routledge).

Ignjatović Aleksandar, Živorad Marković, Sladjana Stanković and Boban Janković, “Anti-Doping through the Pedagogical Approach.” Physical Education and Sport through the Centuries 4, no. 1(2017): 24-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/spes-2016-0019.

Kondric Miran, Damir Sekulic, Andrea Petróczi, Ljerka Ostojic, Jelena Rodek and Zdenko Ostojic. “Is There a Danger for Myopia in Anti-Doping Education? Comparative Analysis of Substance Use and Misuse in Olympic Racket Sports Calls for a Broader Approach.” Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 6 (2011): 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186%2F1747-597X-6-27.

Masucci Matthew A., Ted M. Butryn and Jay A. Johnson. “Knowledge and perceptions of doping practices and anti-doping education among elite North American female triathletes.” Performance Enhancement & Health 6, no. 3–4(2019): 121-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2019.02.001.

Mrkonjic Michaël. “A Review of Good Governance Principles and Indicators in Sport.” Enlarged Partial Agreement on Sport (EPAS) - Council of Europe, 14.

Naha Souvik and David Hassan (eds.). Ethical Concerns in Sport Governance (London: Routledge, 2020).

Patterson Laurie B., Patrick J. Duffy and Susan H. Backhouse. “Are Coaches Anti-Doping? Exploring Issues of Engagement with Education and Research.” Substance Use & Misuse, 49, no. 9(2014): 1182-1185. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2014.912469.

Petróczi Andrea, Paul Norman and Sebastian Brueckner. “Can We Better Integrate the Role of Anti-Doping in Sports and Society? A Psychological Approach to Contemporary Value-Based Prevention.” Med Sport Sci. 62 (2017): 160-176. https://doi.org/10.1159/000460726.

Rudová Lenka. “Anti-Doping Education.” Thesis, University of Economics and Business, Czech Anti-Doping Committee, 2019.

Shilbury David, Lesley Ferkins and Liz Smythe. “Sport Governance Encounters: Insights from Lived Experiences.” Sport Management Review, Volume 16, Issue 3: 349-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2012.12.001.

Somerville Simon, Martyn Lewis, Helma Kuipers. “Accidental Breaches of the Doping Regulations in Sport: Is There a Need to Improve the Education of Sportspeople?” Br J Sports Med 39 no. 8 (2005): 512–516. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2004.013839.

Slepička Pavel (ed.). Problems of Doping Focusing on Children’s and Youth Sport. Proceedings of VIII Sport Sociology Conference (Charles University, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, 2016).

Turfus Sophie C., Johanna O. Smith, Akshai Mansingh, Ruby Lisa Alexander-Lindo and Sharmella Roopchand-Martin. “Supplementation Practices, Perceptions and Knowledge About Anti-Doping Among Jamaican High School Athletes.” Performance Enhancement & Health 7, no. 1–2(2019): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2019.07.001.

Winand Mathieu and Christos Anagnostopoulos. Research Handbook on Sport Governance (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019).

Wippert Pia-Maria and Michael Fließer. “National Doping Prevention Guidelines: Intent, Efficacy and Lessons Learned - A 4 Year Evaluation.” Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 11(2016): 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-016-0079-9.

Zhang, James J. and Euisoo Kim, (eds.). Sport Governance and Operations. Global Perspectives (London, Routledge, 2021).

Council of the EU, Resolution of the Council and of the representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council on the key features of a European Sport Model, ST/14430/21. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A42021Y1213%2801%29.

European Commission, White Paper on Sport, COM (2007) 391 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52007DC0391.

European Commission, Developing the European dimension of sport, COM (2011) 12 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0012:FIN:en:PDF.

European Parliament resolution of 23 November 2021 on EU sports policy: assessment and possible ways forward (2021/2058(INI)), P9_TA(2021)0463. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0463_EN.html.

Olympic Charter. https://olympics.com/ioc/olympic-charter.

World Anti-Doping Code (WADC), International Standard for Education (ISE). https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/ise_draft2.0_december_2018.pdf

Judgment of 1 July 2008, Motosykletistiki Omospondia Ellados NPID (MOTOE) v Elliniko Dimosio, C-49/07, EU:C:2008:376

Judgment of 16 December 2020, International Skating Union v. Commission, CJEU, T-93/18, EU:T:2020:610

Downloads

Published

2023-02-16

How to Cite

Exner, J. (2023). FIGHT AGAINST DOPING, GOOD GOVERNANCE, AND EDUCATION: WHAT ARE THE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CZECH OLYMPIC COMMITTEE?. Sports Law, Policy & Diplomacy Journal, 1(1), 45–104. https://doi.org/10.30925/slpdj.1.1.3

Issue

Section

Articles