Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Suvremena lingvistika , Vol. 42 No. 82, 2016.

  • Datum izdavanja: 28.12.2016.
  • Objavljen na Hrčku: 28.12.2016.

Sadržaj

Puni tekst

Ima li mjesta za preobrazbu u denominalnoj tvorbi hrvatskih glagola? (str. 155-190)

hrvatski pdf 297kb
The formation of Croatian verbs has been described in various ways in Croatian linguistics. Unfortunately, many descriptions fall short of being truly illuminating since the data have not been held up to sufficient scrutiny. What is missing is their critical assessment in the light of issues and debates that have dominated theoretical morphology, viz. on the nature of derivational and inflectional categories and their differentiation (but see Marković 2012). The goal of the present paper is to foreground some of the vagueness and inconsistencies that this situation has engendered in the description of the formation of Croatian verbs from non–verbs. We will discuss arguments for an alternative interpretation of what has typically been analyzed as the derivation of denominal verbs by means of the suffixes –i–, –a–, –ov–a–. This will underscore the need to at least buttress the time–honored descriptions with proper arguments, if not modify them in the light of the arguments presented. This concerns primarily the status and function of those suffixes in the structure of denominal verbs given that a review of existing literature points to: (a) a lack of arguments for treating those suffixes as derivational, (b) the existence of alternative descriptions in anglophone linguistic references of analogical word formation processes in other Slavic languages, including Croatian, where the corresponding/given suffixes are not considered (primarily) derivational, (c) a lack of consideration of the above–mentioned theoretical issues which might have led to more substantiated if not fundamentally different analyses. Since the arguments to be presented clearly indicate a gradient nature of the three suffixes, making them neither uncontroversial means nor unquestionable symptoms of verb formation, we will argue that there is no room for any strict (binary) categorical judgements in the analysis of these verbs, including for a categorical ʻno' as a response to the question in the title of this paper. (str. 0-0)

Gabrijela Buljan
Izvorni znanstveni članak

Hrvatski cirkumfiks jo–…–ń (str. 191-217)

hrvatski pdf 235kb
The Croatian circumfix jo–…–ń (str. 0-0)

Ivan Marković
Izvorni znanstveni članak

Vijeće za normu i teorija upravljanja jezikom (str. 219-235)

hrvatski pdf 161kb
Council for Standard Croatian Language Norm and Language Management Theory (str. 0-0)

Petar Vuković
Izvorni znanstveni članak

Carlo Consani (urednik),Contatto interlinguistico fra presente e passato, LED Milano, 2015., 498 str. (str. 237-241)

hrvatski pdf 98kb
Carlo Consani (Ed.),Contatto interlinguistico fra presente e passato, LED Milano, 2015, 498 pp. (str. 0-0)

Vesna Deželjin
Recenzija, Prikaz slučaja

Joop van der Horst, Propast standardnoga jezika. Mijena u jezičnoj kulturi Zapadne Europe (s nizozemskog preveo Radovan Lučić, Srednja Europa, Zagreb, 2016., 258 str.) (str. 243-247)

hrvatski pdf 69kb
Joop van der Horst, Propast standardnoga jezika. Mijena u jezičnoj kulturi Zapadne Europe (translated by Radovan Lučić, Srednja Europa, Zagreb, 2016, 258 pp) (str. 0-0)

Jurica Polančec
Recenzija, Prikaz slučaja

HrTAL 2016 Conference Chronicle 10th International Conference on Natural Language Processing (str. 0-0)

HrTAL 2016 Conference Chronicle 10th International Conference on Natural Language Processing (str. 249-252)

Lia Dragojević
Vijest

engleski pdf 87kb
Zagrebački lingvistički krug, Izvješće o radu u ak. god. 2015./2016. (str. 253-254)

hrvatski pdf 61kb
Zagrebački lingvistički krug, Izvješće o radu u ak. god. 2015./2016. (str. 0-0)

Barbara Kerovec
Vijest

10. međunarodni znanstveni skup o višejezičnosti i ovladavanju trećim jezikom (str. 255-263)

hrvatski pdf 106kb
10. međunarodni znanstveni skup o višejezičnosti i ovladavanju trećim jezikom (str. 0-0)

Rea Lujić
Vijest

Posjeta: 14.843 *