Izvorni znanstveni članak

A. Bazala's Logic in Retrospect to Petras and Filipović

Srećko Kovač ; Institut za filozofiju, Zagreb, Hrvatska

Sažetak

The paper deals with the basic tenets of A. Bazala's logic and with his upholders in the field - M. Petras and V. Filipović. Bazala's understanding of logic may be quite well reconstructed on the basis of his hitherto unelaborated legacy. It is an intermediary viewpoint between psychologism and logicism with a strong leaning toward the logic of values of the Baden neo-Kantian school. The central issue of Bazala's logic is the theory of judgment and its four-part arrangement (subject, predicate, copula, conclusion), well representing voluntaristic activism. Starting from there, M. Petras developed a theory similar to Bazala's, and he might have influenced Bazala in turn. V Filipović continues Bazala's logic theory, with some important differences, e.g. his understanding of the relation between judgment and concept.

Ključne riječi

Hrčak ID:

82199

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/82199

Datum izdavanja:

4.12.1995.

Podaci na drugim jezicima: hrvatski

Posjeta: 1.609 *