Izvorni znanstveni članak
https://doi.org/10.52685/cjp.22.65.6
Thought Experiments as Social Practice and the Clash of Imaginers
Daniele Molinari
orcid.org/0000-0002-7920-1870
; University of Parma, Parma, Italy
Sažetak
In the last few years, several philosophers have highlighted the social dimension of imagination. In this paper I argue that thought experiments prompt social uses of imaginings if we understand them as props in games of make-believe. In prescribing to imagine stories that develop through fictional narratives, authors of thought experiments prompt their readers to engage in the same imaginative project—at least in its salient aspects—and to endorse their conclusions. Contributions on this topic focus on cases where coordination across imaginers is immediately successful. However, this is not the end of the story. I draw attention to situations where this is not the case, as the practice of thought experimentation often proceeds through criticism, rejections, and amendments. I focus on cases where imaginers do not endorse the conclusion proposed by the author of a thought experiment and either (i) fully reject the principles of generation, (ii) draw different fictional truths from the same principles, or (iii) amend the principles. Although cases of imaginative disharmony are usually dismissed as failures, I acknowledge them as fruitful steps in the cognitive advancement achievable by thought experiments. Cooperative imaginers challenge the rules of the game in meaningful ways, which leads to enhancing fictional scenarios and framing them through different perspectives.
Ključne riječi
Thought experiments; imagination; Kendall Walton; metaphilosophy; epistemology of imagination.
Hrčak ID:
283594
URI
Datum izdavanja:
15.9.2022.
Posjeta: 538 *