Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Izvorni znanstveni članak

https://doi.org/10.17234/SocEkol.31.3.1

Egalitarian Syndrome and Distributive Justice

Vedran Halamić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-7935-1318 ; Hrvatski arhiv podataka za društvene znanosti, Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb, Hrvatska
Vuk Vuković ; Oraclum Intelligence Systems, Velika Britanija
Ivan Burić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-8539-6013 ; Odsjek za komunikologiju, Fakultet hrvatskih studija Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb, Hrvatska
Drago Čengić ; Centar za istraživanje poduzetništva, Institut društvenih znanosti Ivo Pilar, Zagreb, Hrvatska
Aleksandar Štulhofer orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-5138-3644 ; Odsjek za sociologiju, Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb, Hrvatska


Puni tekst: hrvatski pdf 180 Kb

str. 255-272

preuzimanja: 326

citiraj


Sažetak

Unequal distribution is not necessarily perceived as unjust. Most individuals seem to find it unfair only when caused by discrimination, abuse of power or greed. In other words, it is not distributive inequality per se, but unfair distributive inequality that people are bothered with. Such perception seems incompatible with the set of radically egalitarian values that in 1970 Josip Županov titled Egalitarian Syndrome (ES). His ES model implies a general aversion to unequal distribution – irrespective of its rationale. Considering that the assumed association between ES and specific views about distributive justice has never been empirically tested, the current study explored the link between the acceptance of ES and an aversion to unequal distribution. The study used data from 864 participants who were recruited through Facebook in May 2019. After confirmatory factor analysis resulted in a good fi t of two key latent constructs (5-dimensional ES and 3-dimensional perception of distributive justice), path analysis resulted in a strong and positive association between the acceptance of ES and the preference for egalitarian distribution. Interestingly, the indicators of distributive justice in the domains of social and health care were either unrelated or only marginally related to each of the two key constructs, suggesting that the aversion to unequal distribution is not a simple reflection of social solidarity. The current study’s findings corroborate the notion that ES and the perception that unequal distribution is never just are both parts of the same set of informal social norms.

Ključne riječi

Egalitarian syndrome; distributive justice; merit-based distribution; social inequalities; Josip Županov

Hrčak ID:

290922

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/290922

Datum izdavanja:

10.1.2023.

Podaci na drugim jezicima: hrvatski njemački

Posjeta: 883 *