Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Sažetak sa skupa

https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2023.144

Effect of sacubitril/valsartan on heart rate variability parameters in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Mirjana Isailović-Keković ; Hospital “Dr Aleksa Savić”, Prokuplje, Republic of Serbia
Predrag Keković orcid id orcid.org/0009-0006-4033-0292 ; Doctor’s Office “InterKardia 027”, Prokuplje, Republic of Serbia


Puni tekst: engleski pdf 165 Kb

str. 144-144

preuzimanja: 84

citiraj

Preuzmi JATS datoteku


Sažetak

Ključne riječi

sacubitril/valsartan; heart failure; heart rate variability; ejection fraction

Hrčak ID:

301208

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/301208

Datum izdavanja:

27.4.2023.

Posjeta: 219 *



Introduction: Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) is a treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), which impressively impact cardiovascular prognosis by reducing major adverse cardiovascular events such as cardiovascular mortality and sudden death but the precise mechanism underlying the beneficial effect on reducing cardiovascular mortality is still not clear. S/V blocks harmful effects of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation and raising levels of natriuretic peptides that are degraded by neprilysin. S/V can have among patients living with HFrEF by improving imbalance in the cardiac autonomic nervous system (CANS). Data from an international investigation show the benefits that this imbalance has been linked to mortality in HFrEF, noted the study authors. (1-4) The present study aims to assess effects of S/V on heart rate variability parameters (HRV) in symptomatic patients with HFrEF.

Patients and Methods: Patients diagnosed as a HFrEF with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)<40%. 24 patients with HFrEF according to NYHA II-IV classification who aged 49 to 82 years were enrolled in the study. HRV parameters SDNN (standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals) and RMSSD (mean square of differences between consecutive R-R intervals) were reordered before starting S/V and after one two months of the therapy. S/V treatment increased SDNN (67.22±17.7 ms vs. 88.81±16.5 ms, P <0.05) and RMSSD (31.52±12.4 ms vs. 42.9±16.1 ms) in the study participants.

Conclusion: In our study we concluded also that LVEF improved, and plasma N-terminal-pro hormone brain natriuretic peptide fell in accordance with HRV changes.

LITERATURE

1 

Vanderlei LC, Pastre CM, Hoshi RA, Carvalho TD, Godoy MF. Basic notions of heart rate variability and its clinical applicability. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2009 April-June;24(2):205–17. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-76382009000200018 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19768301

2 

Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016 July 14;37(27):2129–200. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27206819

3 

Solomon SD, Claggett B, Desai AS, Packer M, Zile M, Swedberg K, et al. Influence of Ejection Fraction on Outcomes and Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: The Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2016 March;9(3):e002744. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002744 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26915374

4 

Kemp CD, Conte JV. The pathophysiology of heart failure. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2012 September-October;21(5):365–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpath.2011.11.007 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22227365


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.