Izvorni znanstveni članak
https://doi.org/10.52685/cjp.23.67.6
Rawls and the Global Original Position
Jinghua Chen
; The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zeland
Sažetak
Cosmopolitans including Charles Beitz, David Richards, Brian Barry, Thomas Pogge and Gillian Brock propose the device of an original global position to work out global principles of justice. However, John Rawls does not agree with this kind of proposal. In this paper, I add two key original contributions, which go beyond previous arguments by cosmopolitans and advance the current debates. First, to argue against Rawls’s objection to the global original position, I demonstrate the importance of the distinction between accepting a particular substantive principle and accepting the original position procedure. Second, in order to respond to cultural pluralism, I take a unique approach to show that the idea of the person as free and equal is a fundamental part of the global public culture by examining the most fundamental legal documents: the proto-constitutional documents in international law and the constitutions of the major states. I apply Samuel Huntington’s classification of civilisations to identify the major civilisations and their core states and show that the idea of the person as free and equal is implicit in the constitutions of most influential countries even though these countries are categorised in different civilisations.
Ključne riječi
Peace; Rawls; the law of peoples; the global original position; cultural pluralism.
Hrčak ID:
301251
URI
Datum izdavanja:
6.5.2023.
Posjeta: 390 *