Skip to the main content

Review article

https://doi.org/10.31298/sl.149.1-2.6

Overview of invasion and control management options of Cydalima perspectalis (Lepidoptera, Crambidae)

Ana Romana Armanda ; University of Split, Croatia *
Mario Bjeliš orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-3653-5416 ; University of Split, Croatia

* Corresponding author.


Full text: english pdf 430 Kb

versions

page 67-76

downloads: 293

cite

Download JATS file


Abstract

Box tree moth, Cydalima perspectalis, originally from East Asia, has invaded 40 countries in Europe and the Middle East, as well as two countries in North America. The exact pathway of invasion is uncertain, but it is believed to have reached Europe and the United States through multiple introductions by import of boxwood plants, followed by further spread due to biological characteristics of the species, climatic conditions and the wide distribution of the host plant. This review aims to provide an overview of the highly invasive C. perspectalis and identify perspectives for its effective control and management. Possible control methods include insecticides and environmentally friendly options such as entomopathogenic bacterial strains, fungi, nematodes, plant insecticides, and mating disruption. An integrated pest management is crucial for C. perspectalis control. Detection methods, prevention strategies, monitoring of pest and damage, assessing overwintering capacity, and developing effective control measures are key future perspectives. Through research, collaboration, and strategic interventions, it is possible to mitigate the impact of C. perspectalis and protect vulnerable ecosystems from the devastating consequences of this invasive pest.

Keywords

<i>Cydalima perspectalis</i>, invasiveness, <i>Buxus</i>, monitoring, management and control

Hrčak ID:

326796

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/326796

Publication date:

28.2.2025.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 924 *




INTRODUCTION

UVOD

An invasive alien species refers to a species that has negative ecological, economic, or health consequences (Mc Neeley, 2001, Canelles et al. 2021, Roques et al. 2016), particularly noticeable in countries characterized by intensive transport systems and international commerce checkpoints (Humle, 2009; Roques et al. 2016). One such species is the box tree moth, Cydalima perspectalis Walker 1859 (Lepidoptera, Crambidae), a pest of Buxus trees which is indigenous to East Asia (Wang, 1980, Wan et al. 2014). It was accidentally introduced to Europe in Germany in 2006 through the trade of box tree Buxus sempervirens L. (Kruger 2008; Van der Straten and Muus, 2010; Bird et al. 2020), followed by an invasion recorded in almost all countries in eastern and south-eastern Europe, the Middle East (Kenis et al. 2013; Nacambo et al. 2013), North America after introduction to Canada (Wiesner et al. 2021) and in the United States in 2021 (USDA APHIS, 2021, USDA APHIS, 2022). Although a single finding was recorded in Algeria in 2018, no further establishment or spread of the pest has been observed in Africa (Haddad et al. 2020; Kazilas et al. 2021). In its native area, C. perspectalis hosts belong to the genus Buxus and few other non-Buxus host plants (Coyle et al. 2022). Within the Western Palearctic region, the genus Buxus is widely represented, which allowed the fast spread of pest (Kvaček et al. 1982). In North America, where the pest was introduced in 2018, there are no native wild Buxus species (Wiesner et al. 2021). The larvae of C. perspectalis feed on the leaves and bark of B. sempervirens, resulting in complete defoliation and the eventual death of the trees (Bunescu and Florian, 2016). An international trade of ornamental host materials is considered to be the most influential rapid worldwide pest spread, followed by the pest's adaptability to different environments and climatic conditions (Gninenko et al. 2014; Bras et al. 2022). Studies have reported that in the native range of C. perspectalis, natural enemies play a significant role in reducing pest populations and subsequently limiting their expansion (Mally and Nuss, 2010).

The primary objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of the documented data on the global invasion history of C. perspectalis, starting from its initial appearance in Europe, the Middle East, and North America until the present day. Additionally, the study aimed to present the currently available methods for detecting, monitoring, and suppressing populations of C. perspectalis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MATERIALI I METODE

The search for relevant publications for this study encompassed published scientific articles, abstracts, short communications, and reports focused on the geographic areas where C. perspectalis is present. The study presents a comprehensive list of research topics organized into three main categories: (1) invasive pathways, (2) monitoring, and (3) control management. The research area of invasive pathways explores the potential ways in which C. perspectalis can be introduced, particularly through infested host plants facilitated by human transport and trade. The monitoring section provides a concise overview of the following subsections: pheromones, olfactory lures, traps, photoeclectors, and visual host-plant monitoring and damage assessment. These methods contribute to the monitoring efforts aimed at tracking C. perspectalis populations and their impact. The control management section offers a report on the biological, biotechnical and chemical methods used to suppress C. perspectalis populations. It highlights various strategies employed to manage and mitigate the negative effects of this invasive species.

RESULTS

REZULTATI

Invasive pathways - Putevi invazije

After being initially detected in southwestern Germany in 2006 and in the Netherlands in 2007 (Kruger, 2008; Van der Straten and Muss, 2010), C. perspectalis spread further and was observed in several other European countries (Kenis et al. 2013; Nacambo et al. 2014). The global spread and establishment of C. perspectalis can be attributed to various overlapping processes, such as multiple introductions, bridgehead effects, mixing events, biological characteristics of the species (e.g. the ability to fly) and the wide distribution of its host plant (Gninenko et al. 2014; Wiesner et al. 2021; Bras et al. 2022). So far, out of its native range, C. perspectalis has invaded 40 countries in the Western Palearctic area and 2 countries in the Nearctic area. (Table 1 and Figure 1). The suggested climate models confirmed that C. perspectalis will became a serious pest in southern and central Europe (Nacambo et al. 2014), while northern and southern distribution of C. perspectalis is limited by the temperature requirements for completing generation cycle and entering diapause. However, C. perspectalis has also been observed in southern China, where the climate is subtropical and temperatures rarely fall below 10°C, which can be attributed to the presence of different geographic biotypes with adaptive temperature thresholds for biological cycle, diapause initiation and termination (Canelles et al. 2021). Therefore, factors related to climate and temperature play a significant role in determining the distribution and potential spread of C. perspectalis (Nacambo et al. 2014). Genetic analysis of pest populations collected from the original range in South Korea and China during the period 2012-2017 and from invaded areas in Europe between 2007 and 2016 reveal a total of 12 haplotypes indicating a high level of genetic diversity. In the invaded area, only 5 out of the 12 haplotypes were observed, suggesting a potential genetic bottleneck or reduction in diversity during the invasion process. The number of haplotypes also

Table 1. World-wide invasion history of Cydalima perspectalis Tablica 1. Kronološki prikaz širenja Cydalima perspectalis u svijetu

Year - Godina

Country - Država

Literature source - Izvori

2006

Germany (Njemačka)

Kruger (2008)

2007

Switzerland (Švicarska)

Leuthard (2010)

2008

France (Francuska)

Feldtrauer et al. (2009)

The Netherlands (Nizozemska)

Muus et al. (2009)

United Kingdom (Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo)

Salisbury et al. (2012)

2009

Austria (Austrija)

Perny (2010)

Liechtenstein (Lihtenštajn)

Slamka (2010)

2010

Romania (Rumunjska)

Szekely (2011)

2011

Belgium (Belgija)

Casteels et al. (2011)

Italy (Italija)

Bella (2013)

Hungary (Mađarska)

Safian & Horvath (2011)

Turkey (Turska)

Hizal et al. (2012)

The Czech Republic (Češka)

Šumpich (2011)

Slovenia (Slovenija)

Jež (2012)

2012

Croatia (Hrvatska)

Matošević (2013)

Slovakia (Slovačka)

Pastoralis et al. (2013).

Poland (Poljska)

CABI (2022)

2013

Greece (Grčka)

Strachinis et al. (2015)

Russia (Rusija)

Shchurov et al. (2013)

Spain (Španjolska)

Perez – Otero et al. (2014)

Denmark (Danska)

Hobern (2013)

2014

Bulgaria (Bugarska)

Beshkov et al. (2015)

Bosnia and Herzegovina (Bosna i Hercegovina)

Ostojić et al. (2015)

Montenegro (Crna Gora)

Ostojić et al. (2015)

Serbia (Srbija)

Ostojić et al. (2015)

North Macedonia (Sjeverna Makedonija)

Načeski et al. (2018)

Georgia (Gruzija)

Matsiakh (2014)

2015

Ukraine (Ukrajina)

Budashkin (2016)

Luxemburg (Luksemburg)

Ries et al. (2017)

Moldova (Moldavija)

Elisovetcaia et al. (2020)

2016

Albania (Albanija)

Vetek et al. (2019)

Portugal (Portugal)

Corley et al. (2018)

2017

Ireland (Irska)

Plant et al. (2019)

Kosovo (Kosovo)

Geci et al. (2020)

2018

Lithuania (Litva)

Paulavičiute & Mikalauskas (2018)

Maltese Islands (Malta)

Agius (2018)

Gibraltar (Gibraltar)

Perez & Guillem (2019)

Canada (Kanada)

Wiesner et al. (2021)

Algeria (Alžir)

Haddad et al. (2020)

2019

Azores (Portugal) (Azori)

Vieira (2020)

Belarus (Bjelorusija)

Sinchuk et al. (2022)

2021

United States (Sjedinjene Američke Države)

USDA (2021)

image1.png

Figure 1: Graphical representation of the world-wide invasion history of Cydalima perspectalis

Slika 1: Grafički prikaz rasprostranjenosti Cydalima perspectalis u svijetu

varied among the invaded countries. Austria, Greece, and Switzerland had only one haplotype each, Germany and France exhibited the highest genetic diversity, with 4 and 5 haplotypes, respectively, while other European countries maintained a relatively stable number of 2 or 3 haplotypes (Matošević et al. 2017, Bras et al. 2019). These findings strongly suggest that the invasive populations of C. perspectalis in Europe originated from China, as the haplotypes observed in Europe were also found in the Shandong Province, which is known for producing Buxus trees for export. There are several possible reasons for this, including a single funding event with significant genetic diversity, secondary dispersal, or multiple introductions directly from China in various locations at the same time. Furthermore, between 2005 and 2010, the Netherlands imported over 80% of its ornamental plants, with a significant portion coming from East Asia, particularly China (Bras et al. 2019). The introduction of C. perspectalis in Canada remains unknown, but it is believed to be the result of human-induced translocation outside of the nursery sector (Wiesner et al. 2021).

Monitoring - Nadzor

C. perspectalis occurrence, flying period, infestation, and damage can be detected through visual inspections of host plants and by using traps and lures (USDA APHIS, 2022; Ferracini et al. 2022). Visual inspections of host plants in the field and nurseries are essential for overall monitoring activities. These observations help assess the first seasonal appearance of C. perspectalis adults after overwintering, as well as evaluate the level of infestation and damage (Oletan et al. 2017; Gottig and Herz, 2018).

Traps and attractants - Lovke i atraktantni

Traps and lures are useful tools used to monitor the adults of C. perspectalis. Ferracini et al. (2022), as well as Kim and Park (2013) and Bjeliš et al. (2023a), demonstrated that funnel traps captured significantly higher numbers of male C. perspectalis compared to delta sticky traps or wing traps. Kazerani et al. (2019) demonstrated that there is no significant effect of trap colour and height positions of the pheromone traps. Gottig and Hertz (2017) tested the use of light traps to capture both male and female C. perspectalis moths, reporting advantages (attracting both sexes equally, which is important for obtaining data on the temporal occurrence and proportion of both sexes in the field) and disadvantages (dependence on electricity, bulkiness, attraction of various non-target and beneficial insects, high maintenance requirements) (Gottig and Hertz 2017). Pheromones, olfactory lures and bisexual lures have been tested for the control and management of C. perspectalis. Kawazu et al. (2007) identified the sex pheromone of C. perspectalis by analysing ovipositor extracts. Analysis identified three pheromone compounds as potential candidates: (Z)-11-hexadecanal (Z11-16: Ald), (E)-11-hexadecenal (E11-16: Ald), and (Z)-11-hexadecenol (Z11-16:OH), with a ratio of approximately 5 : 1.25 : 1 in the crude extract. Based on findings by Kim and Park (2013) from field and laboratory bioassays, it was concluded that the attractive sex pheromone mixture for C. perspectalis consists of a combination of Z11-16:Ald and E11-16:Ald at a ratio of approximately 5 : 1.25. Molnar et al. (2019) developed bisexual lures to attract both male and female C. perspectalis moths with different compositions of lures and observed their effectiveness in attracting the moths. These findings indicate that the combination of phenylacetaldehyde, eugenol and methyl salicylate in the trap is the most effective in attracting both male and female C. perspectalis moths. Bjeliš et al. (2023a) evaluated different lure doses and found that 3-6 mg of pheromone per trap is the most effective amount.

Photoecletors - Fotoeklektori

Photoeclector is a simple tool that takes advantage of insect phototaxis, and it has been proven to be effective in extracting and estimating the number of C. perspectalis larvae on Buxus plants (Kulfan et al. 2020). Observations had shown that the larvae of C. perspectalis began to leave the photoeclectors shortly after placement, with over 98% of all larvae emerging within the first 8 days. Similar results were obtained when larvae were examined one month after diapause. This method provides a reliable means of detecting and estimating the presence of C. perspectalis larvae, especially during unfavourable weather conditions such as low temperatures and precipitation in winter and early spring, which can limit the detection of larvae in the field (Kulfan et al. 2020).

Visual host-plant monitoring and damage assessment - Vizualna metoda praćenja štetnika i ocjena zaraze

Observation of host plants in the field is a crucial monitoring measure for gaining a better understanding of the development of preimaginal stages, the degree of infestation, overall damage to host plants, the timing of key life cycle events and the development of management strategies of C. perspectalis. (Oltean et al. 2017, Gottig and Herz 2018, Burjanadze et al. 2019). The spatial distribution of C. perspectalis larvae on the host plant exhibits an uneven vertical pattern, as highlighted by Kulfan et al. (2020). Although Buxus plants are primarily defoliated in the lower parts followed by the middle elevation zone, and the least in the upper elevation zone (Matošević, 2013, Kulfan et al. 2020), overwintering larvae prefer middle and higher plant parts (Kulfan et al. 2020). Several authors have dealt with the assessment of damage and infestation intensity in cultivated plants in private gardens. Amaudov et al. (2017) and Burjanadze et al. (2019) recommend classifying damage into 5 damage levels based on the degree of defoliation (from 0 (0%) = undamaged to 4 (>76%) = very strong). Gottig and Herz (2018) used a 0.25 m2 frame to determine the number of preimaginal stages in hedge rows where the percentage of damage should be determined separately for each hedge and each elevation level. In the case of tall plants, damage can be measured at 3 levels above the ground (Kulfan et al. 2020). Kulfan et al. (2020) classified foliar damage by visual inspection as 0%, 50% and 100% damage. Fora and Posta (2015) assessed defoliation based on the percentage of damage, the amount of damage, and the importance of damage. Akinci and Kordoglu (2019) used the same method to assess damage to wild native box trees. Baur et al. (2019) used two methods to estimate damage in wild boxwoods. The first method involved randomly selecting boxwoods and assessing the percentage of damaged leaves on 5 branches per tree. The second method involved observing 10 boxwoods and 50 leaves per tree, scoring each leaf into 5 damage classes based on percentage.

Management and control - Upravljanje i suzbijanje

Biological methods - Biološke metode

Natural enemies of C. perspectalis - Prirodni neprijatelji C. perspectalis

Data on the occurrence of natural enemies and their impact on the population reduction of C. perspectalis are predominantly reported in its native range of South and East Asia (Mally and Nuss, 2010; Wan et al. 2014). In Asia, C. perspectalis has several natural enemies (Table 2) (Wan et al., 2014).

Data on present parasitoids of C. perspectalis in Europe include larval parasitoid Pseudoperichaeta nigrolineata (Walker 1853) (Diptera, Tachinidae) reported in Switzerland (Wan et al. 2014) and Italy (Ferracini et al. 2022), Stenomalina cf. communis (Ness 1834) (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae) in Britain (Nacambo et al. 2014; Bird et al. 2020), Apechthis compunctator (L.) (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae), a pupal parasitoid reported in Switzerland (Wan et al, 2014), and Nemorilla floralis (Fallén, 1810) (Diptera, Tachinidae) in Croatia as a first world record of N. floralis parasitism on C. perspectalis larvae (Bjeliš et al. 2023b). Studies in natural boxwood forests in France and Spain report parasitization by the tachinid fly Campsilure concinnata Meigen 1824 (Morel et al, 2013; Lopez et al, 2014). According to Fauna Europaea, all four tachinid species (P. nigrolineata, S. communis, C. concinnata and N. floralis) are widely distributed in Europe. In addition to the confirmed parasitoids, Trichogramma brasicae Bezdenko 1968 and Trichogramma dendrolimi Matsumura 1926 (Hymenoptera, Trichogrammatidae) have been evaluated as highly polyphagous egg parasitoids of C. perspectalis (Gottig and Herz, 2016). Beneficial predators such as Chrysoperla carnea Stephens 1836 (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae) and Orius majusculus Reuter 1879 (Heteroptera, Anthocoridae) have been observed preying on C. perspectalis eggs. Therefore, conserving natural enemies like O. majusculus and implementing the release of beneficial insects like C. carnea can be considered as supportive tools in the biological control of C. perspectalis (Gottig, 2017) (Table 2).

Entomopathogenic bacteria, nematodes and fungi - Entomopatogene bakterije, nematode I gljive

Various bacterial strains were tested for their insecticidal activity against C. perspectalis larvae. Salioglu and Goktur (2021) found that Bacillus subtilis Ehrenberg 1835 resulted in 82.5% efficacy, while B. thuringiensis subsp. kenyae had 65% efficacy. Tozlu et al. (2022) observed high mortality rates for larvae treated with bacterial strains including B. cereus Frankland & Frankland 1887, Vibrio hollisae Hickman 1982, and B. brevis, with 100% mortality achieved at different time durations for each strain.

Table 2. Natural enemies of C. perspectalis in Asia and Europe

Tablica 2. Prirodni neprijatelji C. perspectalis u Europi i Aziji

Order

Red

Family

Porodica

Species

Vrsta

Host

stage

Stadij

Type

Tip

Source

Izvori

?

Diptera

Tachinidae

Compsilura concinata

Larva

Parasitoid

Chen et al., 2005; Wan

et al., 2014; Morel et

al., 2021

+

Tachinidae

Exorista larvarum

Larva

Parasitoid

Shi & Hu, 2007; Wan

et al., 2014

+

Tachinidae

Pseudoperichaeta

nigrolineata

Larva

Parasitoid

Wan et al., 2014;

Ferracini et al., 2022

+

Tachinidae

Stenomalina

communis

Larva

Parasitoid

Bird et al., 2020

Tachinidae

Nemorilla floralis

Larva

Parasitoid

Bjeliš et al., 2023a

+

Hymenoptera

Braconidae

Chelonus tabonus

Egg

Parasitoid

Wan et al., 2014;

+

Braconidae

Dolichogenidea

stantoni

Larva

Parasitoid

She & Feng, 2006;

Wan et al., 2014;

+

Chalcidae

Brachymeria lasus

Pupa

Parasitoid

Chen et al., 2005

+

Encyrtidae

Tyndarichus sp.

Egg

Parasitoid

Wan et al., 2014

Ichneumonidae

Apechthis

compunctator

Pupa

Parasitoid

Wan et al., 2014;

Ichneumonidae

Casinaria sp.

Larva

Parasitoid

Wan et al., 2014;

Trichogramma

tidae

Trichogramma

brassicae

Egg

Parasitoid

Gottig, 2012

+

Trichogramma

tidae

Trichogramma

dendrolimi

Egg

Parasitoid

Gottig, 2012

+

Thysanoptera

Aeolothripidae

Aeolothrips sp.

EggPredator

Chen et al., 2005

Neuroptera

Chrysopidae

Chrysoperla carnea

EggPredator

Gottig, 2017

+

Heteroptera

Anthocoridae

Orius majusculus

EggPredator

Gottig, 2017

+

? = Perspective for bio-control - Potencijalna biološka kontrola

In laboratory experiments C. perspectalis larvae has shown susceptibility to the use of the baculovirus Anagrapha falcifera nucleopolyhedrovirus (AnafaNPV), providing a new means of pest control (Rose et al., 2013). Saccharopolyspora spinosa Mertz and Yao 1990 based active ingredient spinosad derived from the actinomycete is recommended for suppressing C. perspectalis larvae with a high efficacy rate of 99% (Somsai et al. 2019; USDA APHIS, 2022). Entomopathogenic nematodes Steinernema carpocapae Weiser 1955 and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Poinar 1976 were tested and found to have high efficacy against C. perspectalis mortality rates of 97.8-100% for S. carpocapae and 92-98.9% for H. bacteriophora, highlighting the potential of these nematode species for controlling the pest (Wan et al. 2014). Zemek et al. (2020) demonstrated a 46.4% mortality rate of pupae treated with fungi Isaria fumosorosea Wize 1904, when treated with highest concentration of fungal spores (1x108 spores). The cumulative mean mortality, including malformed adults, varied among the treatments, with the highest mortality (60%) observed in larvae treated with suspensions of 1 × 108 spores (Zemek et al. 2020). In the forests of Iran, the presence of fungal mycelium infecting larvae was observed, leading to the identification of Bauveria bassiana as a natural pathogenic fungus affecting C. perspectalis (Zamani et al. 2017). Mortality of 100% was observed with a suspension of 1 × 108 conidia/ml of B. bassiana. Burjanadze et al. (2019) reported that a suspension of 1 × 108 conidia/ml of B. bassiana caused 80% larval mortality under laboratory conditions and 60% in the field. These findings highlight the potential of B. bassiana as an effective biological control agent against C. perspectalis, both in laboratory and field settings.

Biotechnical methods - Biotehničke metode

Botanical insecticides and essential oils - Botanički insekticidi i esencijalna ulja

Szelenyi et al. (2020) conducted laboratory experiments to assess the repellent effects of essential oils (lavender, cinnamon, and eucalyptus) applied on Buxus plants on the behaviour of female C. perspectalis. The results showed that cinnamon oil had the greatest deterrent effect on females when it came to egg-laying. Gokturk et al. (2019) tested essential oils from various plants (Artemisia absinthium L., Seriphidium santonicum L., Seriphidium spicigerum Koch, Cuminum cyminum L., Mentha pulegium L., Origanum majorana L., Origanum onites L., Origanum syriacum L., Origanum vulgare L., and Satureja hortensis L.) on the 2nd and 5th instar larvae of C. perspectalis. The essential oil of O. vulgare demonstrated an 80% efficacy against both the 2nd instar larvae and the 5th instar larvae, while the essential oil of M. pulegium had the lowest effect on both instar larvae, with a maximum efficacy of 52%. The effects of Azadirachta indica A. Juss 1830 plant extract, specifically azadirachtin, on C. perspectalis larvae were tested by feeding treated leaf discs to 3rd larval stage larvae and reached 62% of mortality after two weeks. Field application of azadirachtin yielded limited success, and it was challenging to determine a precise difference in the number of C. perspectalis before and after treatment. (Gottig and Herz,

2018). Essential oils, such as cinnamon oil and O. vulgare oil, can potentially deter C. perspectalis females and effectively control larvae. Furthermore, the use of azadirachtin from A. indica shows promise, although its efficacy may vary in different settings. Further research is needed to optimize the application methods and determine the long- term effectiveness of these treatments in the field.

Mating disruption - Metoda konfuzije

Since the goal of matting disruption is to disrupt the mating process, this technique is the most effective when applied over extensive areas using pheromones (Miller and Larry, 2015). An experimental mating disruption product had been tested in Croatia for 2 years (2021-2022) on a 70-hectare urban area. (Simmons et al. 2023). The product was developed by TRECE* based on their CideTrakt meso-dispenser system, a solid rubberized plastic dispenser based on the major pheromone component for BTM (Z11-16:Ald). The results of the two years experiments show a 99% trap “shutdown” and BTM larval reductions by as much as 75% in treatment compared to control plots. Dispensers placed at the rate of 50/ha and 80/ha achieved similarly high rates of trap shutdown, which suggests that the lower rate of dispenser placement would be effective (Simmons et al. 2023). A Box T Pro Press product is currently available on the EU market for managing C. perspectalis that can be directly applied to Buxus plants. This product utilizes female pheromones to saturate the area, preventing males from locating females and disrupting the mating process. The active ingredient in this product is (Z)-11-hexadecenal, with a concentration of 70 g/kg (7% p/p). Application of the pheromone can be done by placing small blobs, approximately the size of a small coin, on the trunk or in the corners of the branches.

Laboratory mass rearing and sterile insect technique - Masovni uzgoj u laboratoriju i tehnika steriliziranja štetnika

The sterile insect technique (SIT) is an environmentally friendly method used to manage insect pests on a large scale (Klassen, 2005). To implement the SIT for C. perspectalis, one crucial step is the development of an artificial diet that can support the insect’s full life cycle in laboratory rearing. Previous attempts have involved successfully using costly dried or freeze-dried Buxus spp. powder added to the diet (Kawazu et al. 2010). A diet that does not rely on host materials would lead to sustainable cost-effective and practical mass rearing in the laboratory (Hickin and Nadel, 2022). In conjunction with the artificial diet, ionizing radiation is used to sterilize C. perspectalis females and reduce the fertility of males and their offspring. Preliminary assessments of radiation biology have determined that an optimal radiation dose for C. perspectalis falls between 130 and 200 Gy (Nadel and Simmons, 2022). However, there is currently limited information available regarding sterile male competitiveness and the estimation of effective overflooding ratios of irradiated males compared to wild males (Marec and Vreysen, 2019). Further research and evaluation are needed to optimize the rearing process, determine the competitiveness of sterile males, and assess the effective overflooding ratios. Once these factors are better understood, the SIT can be a valuable tool in managing C. perspectalis populations.

Chemical control - Kemijske mjere

In Asia, various chemical insecticides are commonly used to control C. perspectalis populations: pyrethroids, organophosphates, spinosyns and phenylpyrazoles have been employed (Wan et al. 2014). Among these, spinosad and fipronil are recommended treatments in certain regions of China and have shown effectiveness, particularly against early larval stages of C. perspectalis (Kenis, 2016). In Europe, there is no approved chemical product specifically for controlling C. perspectalis (Kenis et al. 2013). Fora et al. (2016) conducted a field study testing 5 different insecticide products from the group of neonicotinoides and synthetic pyrethroids. In a field study conducted in Romania by Somsai et al. (2019), a significant number of insecticides were tested, but again from the groups of neonicotinoides and synthetical pyrethroids. Even though some of them have shown a 100% larval mortality, almost all of them are forbidden to use in EU nowadays. In North America, both the United States and Canada accepted and recommended insecticides that had already been tested and approved in Europe and Asia (Fora et al., 2016; Coyle et al. 2022; USDA, 2022).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

RASPRAVA I ZAKLJUČCI

The current review given in this article provides and brief overview of the box tree moth C. perspectalis, which has successfully invaded and established populations on several continents and in numerous countries (Kenis et al. 2013; Nacambo et al. 2014; Wiesner et al. 2021). Still, several questions and possibilities for the improvements of the overall strategies to combat this pest should be implemented. Invasive pathways from native area to the Palearctic area are certainly most explored due to extensive genetic proofs, and they demonstrate that the pest was introduced through international trade of infested plant materials first to the Netherlands and then to the surrounding countries through secondary trade (Bras et al. 2019; 2022). Several haplotypes from the pest origin found in Europe support this hypothesis. Contrary, there is lack of information regarding the pathway to North America and its first detection one the Canadian border with the US, while further spreading to the US by natural dispersal is realistic, as well as further spreading along three states in the US (Wiesner et al. 2021). A scientifically proven invasion pathways to North America could contribute to the overall mitigation strategies. Methods of detection and monitoring of C. perspectalis showed which tools were weak in the first decade after the pest was introduced into the Palearctic area. Originally proposed trapping methodology based on the use of the delta sticky trap baited with 1 mg pheromone lure shows insufficient effect for pest detections. Several further experiments demonstrate that both trap type and pheromone dose were improved. Ferracini et al. (2022) as well as Kim and Park (2013) and Bjeliš

et al. (2023a) have demonstrated that funnel trap type captured significantly more C. perspectalis males compared to delta sticky traps or wing traps and that there is no significant effect of trap colour and height positions of the pheromone trap (Kazerani et al. 2019). Bjeliš et al. (2023a) evaluated different lure doses and found that 3-6 mg of pheromone per trap is the most effective amount, especially when compared with 1 mg recommendation. Pheromone-embedded traps are widely used in surveillance programs for to confirm the pest presence in new areas, delimit the scale of infestations, and estimate population densities. However, some questions remain about the effectiveness of these traps, in particular the spatial scale of their attractiveness. The mark-release-recapture study (“multiple release – single trap design” and “multiple trap-single release design” experiments) proposed by Turchin and Odendaal (1996) can be applied with the goal to estimate the “effective sampling area” of the preferred funnel type of traps, which may yield important parameter estimates required by monitoring simulation frameworks to evaluate different surveillance strategies. Certainly, the use of bisexual lures is a significant improvement for developing not only female detection tasks, but also for use in control purposes (Molnar et al. 2019). Control methods for

C. perspectalis include a range of methods with more disadvantages than advantages. The use of various insecticides in private gardens, backyards and public places, even effective have toxicological limitations (Fora et al., 2016; Coyle et al. 2022; USDA, 2022). Among environmentally friendly options, such as entomopathogenic bacteria, fungi and nematodes, there are promising results, but the majority of them need to be more explored and commercially available (Morel et al, 2013; Lopez et al, 2014, Wan et al. 2014, Zamani et al. 2017, Zemek et al. 2020, Salioglu and Goktur 2021, Tozlu et al. 2022). The role of confirmed natural enemies in the invaded areas cannot show significant results in a short time, even though the capacity and range of natural enemies is an essential part of the overall IMP, especially in natural vegetation (e.g. natural boxwood) (Wan et al, 2014, Nacambo et al. 2014; Bird et al. 2020. Ferracini et al. 2022, Bjeliš et al. 2023b). Commercially available parasitoids and predators show significant efficacy in pest control (Gottig and Herz, 2016) and can be considered as supportive tools in the biological control of C. perspectalis. Biotechnical methods of control so far are rapidly developing and represent the possibility of commercial availability both for small producers and for application in large state programs to prevent the spread and suppression of C. perspectalis. Hereby, the use of the botanical insecticides (Gottig and Herz, 2018) has made them widely tested and available products. Mating disruption method is another commercially available method for use both on small and large areas. Box T Pro Press product is currently available on the EU market for managing C. perspectalis that can be directly applied to Buxus plants. Application of the pheromone can be done by placing small blobs on the trunk or in the corners of the branches.

Based on the brief overview of the achievements in the period from the first appearance of C. perspectalis until today, it is clear that the pest surprised the scientific community and the end users with its speed of spread, and the enormous invaded area and damage it caused in the Palearctic area. However, considering the overall importance of natural Buxus forests in the Palearctic area as a feature of the horticultural industry, any effort to timely detect pests on still uninfected areas and the application of precise monitoring tools and modelling methods as well as the application of effective control methods remain a challenge.

References

 

- Bella S., 2013;The box tree moth Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859) continues to spread in southern Europe: new records for Italy (Lepidoptera Pyraloidea Crambidae). REDIA. 51–55

 

- Beshkov, S., S. Abadijev, D. Dimitrov, 2015;Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859) (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea: Crambidae: Spilomelinae) new invasive pest moth in Bulgaria. Entomologist’s Record and Journal of Variation. 127:18–23

 

- Bird, S.,C. Raper, N. Dale-Skey, A. Salisbury, 2020;First records of two natural enemies of box tree moth, Cydalima perspectalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), in Britain. The British Journal of Entomology and NaturalHistory. 33:67–70

 

- Bras, A., D.N. Avitz, M. Kenis, H. LI, G. Vetek, A. Bernard, C. Courtin, J. Rousselet, A. Roques, M.A. Auger-Rozenberg, 2019;A complex invasion story underlies the fast spread of the invasive box tree moth (Cydalima perspectalis) across Europe. Journal of Pest Science. 92:1187–1202

 

- Bras, A., E. Lombeart, M. Kenis, H. Li, A. Bernard, J. Rousselet, A. Roques, M.A. Auger- Rozenberg, 2022;The fast invasion of Europe by the box tree moth: an addition example coupling multiple introduction events, bridgehead effects and admixture events. Biol. Invasions. 24(12):3865–3883

 

- Bjeliš, M., A.R. Armanda, G. Simmons, 2023a: Evaluation of traps, pheromone lure dose, and female attractants for box tree moth detection. First Semi-annual Euphresco BTM Research Update Meeting: Potential for using IPM tools to control or eradicate box tree moth (Cydalima perspectalis) incursions. [published online].https://www.bib.irb.hr/1250913(last accessed 20 Feb. 2023).

 

- Bjeliš, M., A.R. Armanda,, H. Nadel, C. Raper, G. Simmons, 2023b: First Record of Nemorilla floralis (Fallén 1810). (Diptera, Tachinidae) Parasitism on Box Tree Moth – Cydalima perspectalis (Walker 1859) (Lepidoptera, Crambidae) Larvae. Preprints, 2023120107.https://doi. org/10.20944/preprints202312.0107.v1

 

- Budashkin I., 2016;Box wood moth Cydalima perspectalis (Lepidoptera, Pyraustidae) a new for the fauna of Ukraine and Crimea species of a dangerous pest of forestry and greenery. Ekosystemy. 5(35):36–39

 

- Bunescu, H., T. Florian, 2016;The Box Tree Moth, Cydalima perspectalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Crambidae: Spilomelinae) a new invasive species in Cluj Area (Romania). - ProEnvironment. 9:62–66

 

- CABI 2017. Cydalima perspectalis (Box-Tree-Moth). [online].https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/118433(last accessed 6 Feb 2023).

 

- Canelles, Q., E. Bassols, J. Vayerda, L. Brotons, 2021;Predicting the potential distribution and forest impact of the invasive species Cydalima perspectalis in Europe. Ecology and evolution. 11:5713–5727

 

- Casteels, H., J. Witters, S. Vandierendonck, L. Van Remoortere, 2011. First report of Cydalima perspectalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in Belgium.In 63rd International Symposium on Crop Protection. [poster presentation].

 

- Chen, H.L., Z.G. Gao, J.M. Zhou, H.M. Chen, 2005;Bionomics of the box tree pyralis, Diaphania perspectalis (Walker). Jiangxi Plant Protection. 28:1–4

 

- Coyle, D.R., J. Adams, E. Bullas-Appleton, J. Llewellyn, A. Rimmer, M.J. Skvarla, S.M. Smith, J.H. Chong, 2022;Identification and management of Cydalima perspectalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in North America. Journal of Integrated Pest Management. 13:24

 

- Elisovetcaia, D., L. Calaestru, C. Tugulea, V. Derjanschi, 2020;Biological peculiarities of Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859) in the conditions of the Republic of Moldova. AGROFOR International Journal. 5:88–99

 

- EPPO 2022[online].https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/DPHNPE/distribution (lastaccessed 13 Jan. 2023).

 

- Feldtrauer, J.K., J.J. Feldtrauer, C. Brua, 2009. First reports in France of the Bowood moth Diaphania perspectalis. (Walker, 1859), an invasive alien species attacking Boxwood (Lepidoptera, Crambidae).65(4):p. 55–58

 

- Ferracini, C., C. Pogolotti, P. Mancardi, M. Miglio, S. Bonelli, F. Barbero 2022;The box tree moth: An invasive species severely threatening Buxus natural formation in NW Italy. Forests. 13(2):178

 

- Fora, C.G., L. Sasu, D. Posta, C. Berar 2016;Chemical possibilities of Cydalima perspectalis Walk. ((Lepidoptera). Crambidae). control. Journal of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology. 20(3):31–34

 

- Geci, D., M. Musliu, A. Bilalli, H. Ibrahimi 2020;New records of Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859) (Lepidoptera, Crambidae) from Albania and Kosovo. Natura Croatica. 20:135–138

 

- Gokturk. T., N. Chackhiani-Anasashvili, S. Kordali, G. Dumbadze, A.U. Bozhuyuk 2020: Insecticidal effects of some essential oils against box tree moth (Cydalima perspectalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)). International Journal of Tropical Insect Science. 41:313–322

 

- Gottig, S., A. Herz, 2016;Are egg parasitoids of the genus Trichogramma (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) promising biological control agents for regulating the invasive Box tree pyralis, Cydalima perspectalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)? Biocontrol Science and Technology. 26(11):1471–1488

 

- Gottig, S., A. Herz, 2018;Susceptibility of the box tree moth Cydalima perspectalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) to potential biological control agents Neem (NeemAzal – T/S) and entomopathogenic nematodes (Nemastar) assessed in laboratory bioassays and field trials. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection. 125:365–375

 

- Haddad, K., K. Kalaentzis, J. Demetriou, 2020;On track to become a cosmopolitan invasive species: First record of the box tree moth Cydalima perspectalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in the African continent. Entomologia hellenica. 29(2):27–32

 

- Hizal, E., E. Kose, C. Yesil, D. Kaynar, 2012;The new pest Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in Turkey. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 11(3):400–403

 

- Hickin, M., H. Nadel, 2022. Current status of artificial diet development. First Semi-annual Euphresco BTM Research Update Meeting: Potential for using IPM tools to control or eradicate box tree moth (Cydalima perspectalis) incursions. [published online].https://www.bib.irb. hr/1250913(last accessed 16 Mar. 2023).

 

- Hobern D., 2013. Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859). [online].https://www.flickr.com/photos/dhobern/9418970083/(last accessed 17 Feb. 2023).

 

- Humle P.E., 2009;Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. Journal of applied ecology. 46(1):10–18

 

- Jež M., 2012. Cydalima perspectalis (Walker 1859)(Lepidoptera: Crambidae),; box tree moth, new moth species in Slovenia.Abstract book of the Third Slovenian Entomological Symposium with International Attendance.

 

- Kawazu, K., H. Honda, S. Nakamura, T. Adati, 2007;Identification of sex pheromone components of the box tree pyralid, Glyphodes perspectalis. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 33(10):1978–1985

 

- Kawazu, K., J. Demetriou, K. Kalaetnzis, 2010;Rearing of the box tree pyralid, Glyphodes perspectalis, larvae using an artificial diet. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 45(1):163–168

 

- Kazilas, C., J. Demetriou, K. Kalaentzis, 2020;Filling the gaps in the distribution of an alien species: The case of the feather-legged fly Trichopoda pennipes (Diptera: Tachinidae) in the Western Palearctic. Entomologia Hellenica. 29(1):8–16

 

- Kenis, M., S. Nacambo, F.L.G. Leuthardt, F. Domenico, T. Haye, 2013;The box tree moth, Cydalima perspectalis in Europe: horticultural pest or environmental disaster? Aliens: The Invasive Species Bulletin. 33:38–41

 

- Kim, J., I.K. Park, 2013;Female sex pheromone components of the box tree pyralid, Glyphodes perspectalis, in Korea: field test and development of film-type lure. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology. 16:473–477

 

- Klassen W., 2005. Area-wide integrated pest management and the sterile insect technique. Sterile Insect Technique.Principles and Practice in Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management. p. 39–68

 

- Kruger E.O., 2008;Gylphodes perspectalis (Walker, 1859) – new for the European fauna neu fur die Fauna Europas (Lepidoptera: Crambridae). Entomologische Zeintschrift mit Insekten-Börse. 118:81–83

 

- Kulfan, J., M. Dzurenko, M. Parak, L. Sarvašova, M. Saniga, P.M.J. Brown, P. Zach, 2020;Larval feeding of Cydalima perspectalis on box trees with a focus on the spatial and temporal distribution. Plant Protection Science. 56(3):197–205

 

- Kvaček, Z., Č. Bužek, F. Holy, 1982;Review of Buxus fossils and a new large-leaved species from the Miocene of Central Europe. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 3734:361–394

 

- Matošević D., 2013;Box tree moth (Cydalima perspectalis, Lepidoptera; Cambridae), new invasive insect pest in Croatia. South-east European forestry: SEEFOR. 4(2):89–94

 

- Matošević D., Lukić I., Bras A., Lacković N., Pernek M. 2017;Spatial Distribution, Genetic Diversity and Food Choice of Box Tree Moth (Cydalima perspectalis) in Croatia //. South-east European forestry. 8:20171:41–46. https://doi.org/ 10.15177/seefor.17-06

 

- Matsiakh I., 2014. Assessment of forest pests and diseases in Protected Areas of Georgia. Final Report. Tbilisi. [online].wwwenpi-fleg. org. (last accessed 9 Jan. 2023).

 

- Mc Neeley 2001;Global Strategy on Invasive Alien Species. IUCN.

 

- Mertz, F.P., R.C. Yao, 1990;Saccharopolyspora spinosa sp. nov. isolated from soil collected in a sugar mill rum still. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 40(1):34–39

 

- Molnar, B.P., Z. Karpati, A. Nagy, I. Szarukan, J. CsabaI, S. Koczor, M. Toth 2019;Development of a Female-Targeted Lure for the Box Tree Moth Cydalima perspectalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). A preliminary report. Journal of chemical ecology. 45:657–666

 

- Muus, T.S.T., E.J. Van Haaften, L.J. Van Deventer 2009;The box-tree pyralid Palpita perspectalis (Walker) in The Netherlands (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Entomologische Berichten. 69(2):66–67

 

- Nacambo, S., F.L.G. Leuthardt, H. Wan, H. LI, T. Haye, B. Baur, R.M. Weiss, M. Kenis, 2014;Development characteristics of the box-tree moth Cydalima perspectalis and its potential distribution in Europe. Journal of Applied Entomology. 13812:14–26

 

- Načeski, S., I. Papazova-Anakieva, B. Ivanov, S. Lazarevska, B. Šurbevski, 2018;Occurrence of the new invasive insect Cydalima perspectalis Walker on box tree moth in the Republic of Macedonia. Contributions, Section of Natural, Mathematical and Biotechnical Sciences. 39(2):133–139

 

- Nadel, H., G. Simmons, 2022. Radiation Biology for Sterile Insect Technique. First Semi-annual Euphresco BTM Research Update Meeting: Potential for using IPM tools to control or eradicate box tree moth (Cydalima perspectalis) incursions. (14):p. 7[online].https://www.bib.irb. hr/1251187(last accessed 1 Mar. 2023).

 

- Ostojić, I., M. Zovko, D. Petrović, D. Elez, 2015. New records of box tree moth Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859)in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Radovi Poljoprivrednog Fakulteta Univerziteta u Sarajevu (Works of the Faculty of Agriculture University of Sarajevo). 6065(1):p. 139–143

 

- Pastoralis, G., G. Elsner, F. Kopeek, F. Kosorin, A. Laštuvka, A. Lendela, J. Liška, J. Nimy, I. Richter, R. Stefanovie, J. Šumpich, Z, Tokar 2013;Fourteen Lepidoptera species new to the fauna of Slovakia. Folia faunistica Slovaca. 18(1):1–12

 

- Paulavičiute, B., D. Mikalauskas, 2018;First record of the box tree moth Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in Lithuania. Bulletin of the Lithuanian entomological society. 2(30):55–59

 

- Perez, C.E., R.M. Gullium, 2019;First records of the pest species Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859) and Paysandisia archon (Burmeister, 1880) in Gibraltar (Lepidoptera: Crambidae & Castniidae). Revista de la Sociedad Gaditana de Historia Natural. 13:15–18

 

- Perez-Otero, R., J.P. Mansilla, M. Vidal, 2014. Cydalima perspectalis Walker, 1859 (Lepidoptera, Crambidae): a new threat for Buxus spp.in the Iberian Peninsula. Arquivos entomolóxicos. 10:p. 225–228

 

- Perny B., 2010;Mass outbreak of box tree pyralid Diaphania perspectalis in the East of Austria. Forstschutz aktuell. 50:17–19

 

- Ries, C., A. Arendt, C. Braunert, S. Christian, A. Dohet, A. Frantz, G. Geimer, M. Hellers, J.A. Massard, X. Mestdagh, R. Proess, N. Schneider, M. Pfeiffenschneider, 2017;Environmental impact assessment and black, watch and alert list classification after the ISEIA Protocol of invertebrates in Luxembourg. Bull. Soc. Nat. Luxemb. 114:15–21

 

- Roques, A., M.A. Auger-Rozenberg, T.M. Blackburn, J. Garnas, P. Pyšek, W. Rabitsch, D.M. Richardson, M.J. Wingfield, A.M. Liebhold, R.P. Duncan, 2016;Temporal and interspecific variation in rates of spread for insect species invading Europe during the last 200 years. Biological invasions. 18:907–920

 

- Rose, J., R.G. Kleespies, Y. Wang, J.T. Wennmann, J.A. Jehle, 2013;On the susceptibility of the box tree moth Cydalima perspectalis to Anagrapha falcifera nucleopolyhedrovirus (AnfaNPV). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 113(3):191–197

 

- Safian, S., B. Horvath, 2011;Box Tree Moth – Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859), new member in the Lepidoptera fauna of Hungary (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Natura Somogyiensis. 19:245–246

 

- Salioglu. S., T. Gokturk, 2021;Determination of the effects of some entomopathogens on Cydalima perspectalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) larvae. Turkish Journal of Biodiversity. 4(1):31–35

 

- Salisbury, A., A. Korycinska, A.J. Halstead, 2012;The first occurrence of larvae of the box tree moth Cydalima perspectalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in private gardens in the UK. British Journal of Entomology and Natural History. 25(1):1

 

- Shchurov, V., A. Bondarenko, E. Vibe, 2013. The current spread of new species-invaders (Insecta: Homoptera, Heteroptera, Hymenoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera) in tree and shrub ecosystems of the Northwest Caucasus.Pests and diseases of woody plants in Russia, St. Petersburg: p. 25–27

 

- She, D., F. Feng, 2006;Bionomics and Control of Diaphania perspectalis. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology. 26(6):47

 

- Simmons, G., M. Bjeliš, A.R. Armanda 2023: Evaluation of mating disruption for box tree moth area-wide control programs. First Semi-annual Euphresco BTM Research Update Meeting: Potential for using IPM tools to control or eradicate box tree moth (Cydalima perspectalis) incursions. [online].https://www.bib.irb.hr/1251187(last accessed 1 Apr. 2023).

 

- Sinchuk, A., N. Sinchuk, A. Kolbas, 2020;First record of Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in Brest (Belarus). Bulletin of the Lithuanian Entomological Society. 4(32):61–64

 

- Slamka F., 2010. Pyraloidea (Lepidoptera) of Central Europe. Fantišek Slamka Publishing Bratislava.;

 

- Somsai, A.P., L. Lukacs, T. Florian, A.F. Sestras, C.I. Bunea, A. Hoble, H. Vlasain, 2019. Chemical control of box tree moth Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859)(Lepidoptera: Crambidae); in North- Western Romania. Agricultura-Revistă de Știință și Practică Agricolă. 2834:p. 210–216

 

- Stranchinis, I., C. Kazilas, F. Karamaouna, N.E. Papanikolaou, G.K. Partsinevelos, P.G. Milonas, 2015;First record of Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in Greece. Hellenic Plant Protection Journal. 8:66–72

 

- Šumpich J., 2011. Die Schmetterlinge der Nationalparke Podyji und Thayatal.Die Schmetterlinge der Nationalparke Podyji und Thayatal. Správa Národního parku Podyjí. Znojmo–1, 1-428 [In Czech and German, with English abstract].

 

- Szekely, L., V. Dinca, C. Mihai, 2011;Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859), a new species for the Romanian fauna (Lepidoptera: Crambidae: Spilomelinae). Buletin de informare Entomologica. 2234:73–77

 

- Szeleny, M.O., A.L. Erdei, J.K. Josvai, D. Radvanyi, B. Sumegi, G. Vetek, B.P. Molnar, Z. Karpati 2020;Essential oil headspace volatiles prevent invasive Box Tree Moth (Cydalima perspectalis) oviposition - Insights from electrophysiology and behaviour. Insects. 11(8):465

 

- Turchin, P., F.J. Odendaal, 1996;Measuring the effective sampling area of a pheromone trap for monitoring population density of southern pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ. Entomol. 25:582–590

 

- Van Der Straten, M.J., T.S.T. Muus, 2010;The box tree pyralid, Glyphodes perspectalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), an invasive alien moth ruining box tree. Proceedings of the Netherlands Entomological Society Meeting. 21:107–111

 

- Vieira V., 2020;First record of Cydalima perspectalis. (Walker, 1859) from São Miguel Island, Azores (Portugal) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae).Shilap – Revista de Lepidepterologia. 48(189):141–146

 

- Wan, H., T. Haye, M. Kenis, S. Nacambo, H. Xu, F. Zhang, H. Li, 2014;Biology and natural enemies of Cydalima perspectalis in Asia: is there biological control potential in Europe? Journal of Applied Entomology. 138(10):715–722

 

- Wiesner, A., J. Llewellyn, S.M. Smith, C. Scott-Dupree, 2021. Biology and distribution of box tree moth (Cydalima perspectalis)(Walker,: 1859in southern Ontario. In Proc. of the 1st International Electronic Conference on Entomology.

 

- Zamani, S.M., S. Farahani, M.E. Farashiani, M. Salehi, S. Samavat 2017;The first record of Beauveria bassiana on box tree moth, Cydalima perspectalis in Iran. Iranian Journal of Forest and Range Protection Research. 15(2):199–202

 

- Zemek, R., J. Konopicka, Z. Ul Abdin, 2020;Low efficacy of Isaria fumosorosea against Box tree moth Cydalima perspectalis: Are host plant phytochemicals involved in herbivore defence against fungal pathogens? Journal of Fung. 6(4):342


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.