Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

DECENTRALIZATION AND HOW TO CONDUCT IT – AS A REVOLUTION OR AN EVOLUTION? COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH AND MANAGEMENT CAPACITY BUILDING AS A PREREQUISITE FOR SUCCESSFUL DECENTRALIZATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA

SELMA ŠOGORIĆ orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-2314-2146 ; University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Andrija Štampar School of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia
ALEKSANDAR DŽAKULA ; University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Andrija Štampar School of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia
OZREN POLAŠEK ; University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Andrija Štampar School of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia
SONJA GROZIĆ-ŽIVOLIĆ ; Istarska županija, Upravni odjel za zdravstvo i socijalnu skrb, Pula, Hrvatska
SLOBODAN LANG ; University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Andrija Štampar School of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia


Full text: croatian pdf 104 Kb

page 335-340

downloads: 544

cite


Abstract

Aim: Based on the results of the first phase of the County Public Health Capacity Building Program named Health-Plan for It,
implemented in the Republic of Croatia during the 2002-2008 period, this article analyzes the relationship between training of the county teams and their ability to develop health policy. Our hypothesis was that decentralized model of health planning and management would not occur just by changing legislation alone. Counties in Croatia needed educational support (learning-bydoing training) in order to improve public health practices at the county level.
Sample and Methods: During the 2002-2005 period, the first 15 county teams (so-called first cycle counties) completed their training. The teams consisted of 12 to 15 members, representatives of political and executive component, technical component (public health professionals, representatives of health and social welfare institutions) and community members (non-government sector and media). Teams were trained in cohorts. Three counties passed together through the six-month process of modular training (four education modules, with four days of intensive training and “homework” between modules) at the time. The remaining 5 counties (second-cycle counties) completed the same kind of training in 2007-2008. The Public Health Performance Matrix (the Local Public Health Practice Performance Measures instrument developed by the US CDC Public Health Practice Program
Office) was used as an evaluation instrument. Each county team had to fill it out at the beginning of education.
Results: Comparison of the Public Health Performance Matrices of first cycle counties (training in 2002-2005) with those of the
second cycle counties (trained several years later) yielded no differences. Although training materials were publicly available
(accessible through the Croatian Healthy Cities web pages) for years, the second cycle counties did not spontaneously (without
training) increase their county-level capacities for participative health needs assessment, health planning, and provision of health
services tailored to the local needs.
Conclusion: Results of this study showed that decentralized model of health planning and management in Croatia could not be developed without educational support given to the lower level of administration. Only through the training process (the Health-Plan for It County Public Health Capacity Building Program), county teams had managed to develop policy function and create County Health Profiles and Strategic Framework of the County Health Plan

Keywords

decentralization; health planning and management; county team training

Hrčak ID:

118755

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/118755

Publication date:

29.3.2014.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 1.815 *