Original scientific paper

Representationalism, Double Vision, and Afterimages: A Response to Işık Sarıhan

René Jagnow ; University of Georgia, Georgia, USA

Abstract

In his paper “Double Vision, Phosphenes and Afterimages: Non-Endorsed Representations rather than Non-Representational Qualia,” Işık Sarıhan addresses the debate between strong representationalists and qualia theorists (Sarıhan 2020). He argues that qualia theorists like Ned Block and Amy Kind who cite double-vision, afterimages, etc., as evidence for the existence of qualia are mistaken about the actual nature of these states. According to Sarıhan, these authors confuse the fact that these states are non-endorsed representational states with the fact that they are at least partly non-representational. I argue that Sarıhan’s argument contains gaps that suggest that he misidentifi es the mistake that leads these qualia theorists to their conclusion. In my view, these qualia theorists do not confuse the fact that the states in question are non-endorsed states with the fact that they are non-representational, but rather mistake certain representational contents, or certain aspects of these contents, for qualia.

Keywords

Perception; representationalism; qualia; afterimages; double vision.

Hrčak ID:

253673

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/253673

Publication date:

15.12.2020.

Visits: 743 *