Can Consumer Survey produce a new measure of household financial distress?
The goal of this paper is the pioneering application of the Harmonised EU Consumer Survey (CS) in tracking poverty levels in Croatia. As opposed to the annual EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) variables, CS offers considerable benefit by providing monthly information on the financial position of consumers. The interest lies in calculating a CS-based composite indicator of household financial distress using factor analysis. The newly proposed indicator could serve as a timely indicator of cumulous socio-economic problems in Croatia, as well as in all other EU member states, and in that way significantly complement the EU-SILC data. The harmonised European CS offers three questions pointing to the financial situation of households (Q1: Financial situation over last 12 months, Q2: Financial situation over the next 12 months, and Q12: Statement on financial situation of the household). The main advantage of these questions is their monthly frequency, providing better detailed information than annual EU-SILC data on prevailing social trends. Factor analysis calculated the new CS composite indicator of household financial distress based on three selected CS variables, as mentioned above. One factor was extracted, the factor scores were calculated, and then compared to the chosen variables from the EU-SILC data.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).