Digital Skills Towards Competitiveness of Human Resources Efficiency: Comparative Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54820/entrenova-2023-0004Keywords:
ICT development index, Scandinavian countries, skills, comparationAbstract
Imagining people's functions in everyday life and work without ICT seems complicated. Since it substantially ensures the competitiveness of different systems at the micro and macro levels, its application is ubiquitous, regardless of the aspect from which it is observed. Numerous national and multinational strategies try to encourage educational systems, focusing on ICT to acquire skills, competencies and knowledge more effectively. This should represent added value to all future generations. This article emphasizes the structural approach to market divergence, and it analyzes the representation of the ICT development index (ICT) in European countries that compares a set of Scandinavian countries and other European Union countries. It is known that Scandinavian countries belong to those countries that have recognized the importance of involving ICT in educational programs, which improves the economy of a particular selected country. Considering this, the research reveals how ICT is essential in improving socio-economic development in many countries.
References
Chaidi, I., Drigas, A., & Karagiannidis, C. (2021). ICT in special education. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 23, 187–198. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v23i1.4277
Chanyagorn, P., & Kungwannarongkun, B. (2011). ICT Readiness Assessment Model for Public and Private Organizations in Developing Country. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 99–106. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2011.V1.17
Christensson, A., Gerson, N., & Wallin, E. (2013). A Mapping of Scandinavian Smart Grid Development in the Distribution System from an ICT perspective. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-124208
Deng, F., Liu, C., & Liang, X. (2017). Measurement of Regional Agricultural Sustainable Development System Based on Dissipative Structure Theory: A Case Study in Sichuan Province, China. Sustainability, 9, 2047. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112047
Erguzen, A., Erdal, E., & Ünver, M. (2018). Big Data Challenges and Opportunities in Distance Education. 6.
Erkhembaatar, N., & Otgonbayar, B. (2021). ENTROPY WEIGHT METHOD FOR EVALUATING INDICATORS OF ICT DEVELOPMENT INDEX. International Journal of Current Advanced Research, 9, 23500–23504. https://doi.org/10.24327/ijcar.2020.23504.4654
Hatlevik, I., & Hatlevik, O. (2018). Examining the Relationship Between Teachers’ ICT Self-Efficacy for Educational Purposes, Collegial Collaboration, Lack of Facilitation and the Use of ICT in Teaching Practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 935. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00935
Hunady, J., Pisár, P., Vugec, D. S., & Bach, M. P. (2022). Digital Transformation in European Union: North is leading, and South is lagging behind. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 10(4), 58–81.
ITU | 2017 Global ICT Development Index. (n.d.). Retrieved March 28, 2023, from https://www.itu.int/net4/ITU-D/idi/2017/#idi2017economycard-tab&DNK
Jacobsson, M., & Linderoth, H. (2021). Newly graduated students’ role as ambassadors for digitalization in construction firms. Construction Management and Economics, 39, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2021.1955398
Jacobsson, M., Linderoth, H., & Rowlinson, S. (2017). The role of industry: An analytical framework to understand ICT transformation within the AEC industry. Construction Management and Economics, 35, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2017.1315148
Khetarpal, A. (2015). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and Disability. Review of Market Integration, 6, 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974929214560117
Koivusilta, L. K., Lintonen, T. P., & Rimpelä, A. H. (2007). Orientations in adolescent use of information and communication technology: A digital divide by sociodemographic background, educational career, and health. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 35(1), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/14034940600868721
Measuring ICT: the global status of ICT indicators | Eldis. (n.d.). Retrieved March 28, 2023, from https://eldis.org/document/A64013
Mercurio, E., García-López, E., Morales-Quintero, L. A., Llamas, N. E., Marinaro, J. Á., & Muñoz, J. M. (2020). Adolescent Brain Development and Progressive Legal Responsibility in the Latin American Context. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 627. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00627
Niepostyn, S. J., & Daszczuk, W. B. (2023). Entropy as a Measure of Consistency in Software Architecture. Entropy, 25(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25020328
OECD. (2014). Measuring the Digital Economy: A New Perspective. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264221796-en
OECD Regional Well-Being—How is life? (n.d.). OECD Regional Well-Being. Retrieved March 30, 2023, from https://oecdregionalwellbeing.org
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
Technology for inclusion—UNESCO Digital Library. (n.d.). Retrieved April 4, 2023, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373655
Tømte, C. E., Laterza, V., Pinheiro, R. M., & Avramovic, A. (2020). Is there a Scandinavian model for MOOCs? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 15(4), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2020-04-02
Weaver, E. K. (1953). Science and developing democratic theory. Science Education, 37(5), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730370503
Wiens, J. J. (1998). Combining Data Sets with Different Phylogenetic Histories. Systematic Biology, 47(4), 568–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/106351598260581
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Marino Stanković, Iris Mihajlović, Cvijeta Djevojić
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.