Innovation Activities and Financial Performance: The Case of Kosovo

Autoři

  • Arbnora Latifaj ANG&Partners, Kosovo

Klíčová slova:

innovation activities, firm performance, ownership structure, training

Abstrakt

The aim of this research is to investigate the impact of innovation activities and its determinants on firm performance. For the empirical analysis of the study we use Business Environment Enterprise Performance Surveys (BEEPS) firm-level data conducted by the World Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) in 2013-2014. To examine the relationship between innovation activities and its determinants to firm performance we applied multiple regression analysis and descriptive statistics on 202 companies from Kosovo. Moreover, empirical evidence results of neighbouring countries were compared to our findings for each determinant and its effect on firm performance. By investigating the innovation-performance relationship we found sufficient evidence that supports the main hypothesis. As for the innovation determinants our results indicate that factors as domestic ownership, age, and training affect the tendency of firms to innovate, thus positively affecting firm performance.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Reference

Abazi-Alili, H. (2014), “Innovation Activities and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Transition Economies”, Journal of Contemporary Economic and Business Issues, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 5-18.

Bigliardi, B. (2013), “The effect of innovation on financial performance: A research study involving SMEs”, Innovation, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 245-255.

Business Environment Enterprise Performance Surveys (BEEPS) firm-level data; World Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) in 2013-2014.

Hadzimustafa, Sh., Rexhepi, G. (2008), “Measuring Innovation in The 21st Century”, in proceedings of the International Conference: Economic Integration into the EU, University of Tirana, Tirana, Albania.

Haned, N., Mothe, C., Nguyen-Thi, T. U. (2014), “Firm persistence in technological innovation: the relevance of organizational innovation”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 23, No. 5-6, pp. 490-516.

OECD (2005), Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Economic University Press, London.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and democracy, Harper and Brothers.

Sledzik, K. (2013), “Schumpeter’s View on Innovation and Entrepreneurship”, in Hittmar, S. (Ed.), Management Trends in Theory and Practice, Faculty of Management Science and Informatics, University of Zilina, pp. 89-95.

Vezzani, A., Montresor, S. (2013), “The production function of top R&D investors: Accounting for size and sector heterogeneity with quantile estimations”, JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation No. 02/2013, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).

Stahování

Publikováno

2018-10-31

Jak citovat

Latifaj, A. (2018). Innovation Activities and Financial Performance: The Case of Kosovo. ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion, 4(1), 356–363. Získáno z https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/entrenova/article/view/13937

Číslo

Sekce

Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth