A Case Study of Investor R&D Evaluation using Game Theory

Autor(i)

  • Andreas Georgiou Babes Bolyai University, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54820/entrenova-2022-0009

Ključne riječi:

intangibles, investment, strategy, matrices, R&D, capitalisation

Sažetak

This paper aims to identify an optimal investment strategy in cases of high-intensity R&D private micro entities. A game theory matrix is constructed using publicly available empirical data extracted from the financial statements of an R&D-intensive private micro-entity. The game theory matrix attempts to estimate the effect of the discretionary managerial choice to capitalise or expense the development cost of internally generated intangible assets; investors' risk appetite could be affected by the capitalisation signalling. The investment strategies are classified based on their risk into three categories. High risk is represented by equity. Medium risk is represented by long-term debt, and low risk is represented by short-term debt. The game theory matrix results indicate that in similar situations, the dominant strategy is the medium-risk approach through long-term debt. This strategy must be confirmed by solving more game theory matrices based on similar R&D-intensive firms. However, it is an easily constructed advisory indicator for retail investors considering investing in unaudited small private entities. They could use it to identify an optimal investment strategy when uncertain of the genuine intangible asset prospects signaled via development cost capitalization.

Reference

Ciftci, M., Zhou, N. (2016), "Capitalizing R&D expenses versus disclosing intangible information", Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 661-689.

Clausen, S., Hirth, S. (2016), "Measuring the value of intangibles", Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 40, pp. 110-127.

Dugar, A., Pozharny, J. (2021), "Equity Investing in the Age of Intangibles", Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 77, No. 2, pp. 21-42.

Gatchev, V.A., Spindt, P.A., Tarhan, V. (2009), "How do firms finance their investments?. The relative importance of equity issuance and debt contracting costs", Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 179-195.

Gong, J.J., Wang, S.I. (2016), "Changes in the value relevance of research and development expenses after IFRS adoption", Advances in Accounting, Vol. 35, pp. 49-61.

ICAEW (2021), “FRS 105 The Financial Reporting Standard applicable to the Micro-Entities Regime”, available at: https://www.icaew.com/technical/financial-reporting/uk-gaap/frs-105-the-financial-reporting-standard-applicable-to-micro-entities / (10 Nov 2021)

Penman, S.H. (2009), "Accounting for intangible assets: there is also an income statement", Abacus, Vol.45 No.3, pp 358-371.

UK. Companies House (2021), “Get-information-about-a-company”, available at: https://www.gov.uk/get-information-about-a-company / (15 February 2020)

Vasiliou, D., Iriotis, N. (2009), “Analysh ependysewn & diaxeirish xartofylakiou”, Rosili, Athens.

##submission.downloads##

Objavljeno

2022-11-10

Kako citirati

Georgiou , A. . (2022). A Case Study of Investor R&D Evaluation using Game Theory. ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion, 8(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.54820/entrenova-2022-0009

Broj časopisa

Rubrika

Financial Economics