Multi-Criteria Decision Making Application in the Education Context
Ključne reči:
decision-making, higher education institution, teaching staff, business school agenda, multi criteriaApstrakt
Business schools are confronted with a challenge of developing students to be managers, focused on productivity and adding value at the work process. 21st century education should aid student population substantially in thinking beyond profitability and self-interest and lead their strategical thinking process towards sustainable development. Our aim is to help the teaching staff in business education by providing them the tools to understand their students’ decision-making process and preferences. The goal of the study is to investigate if modern technologies support responsible decision making of students. A quantitative study was carried. The tool used was Super Decisions Software. Our results show that technology, even though a potentially useful tool in the responsible decision-making process needs integration into the appropriate business models. The sample of students’ behaviours in decision-making process can also be identified as responsible.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Reference
Adler, P. S. (2016), “2015 Presidential Address Our Teaching Mission”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 185-195.
Atwater, J. B., Kannan, V. R., Stephens, A. A. (2008), “Cultivating Systemic Thinking in the Next Generation of Business Leaders”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 9-25.
Bomgardner, M. M. (2016), “Cleaning the clothing industry”, C&EN Global Enterprise, Vol. 94, No. 26, pp. 30-32.
Brown, K. G., Härtel, C. E. J. (2010). Introduction: Decisions, Decisions. Academy of Management Education and Learning, Vol. 9, No. 4, p. 726.
Burke, L. A., Sadler-Smith, E. (2006), “Instructor Intuition in the Educational Setting”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 169-181.
Creative Decision Foundation (2016), available at: http://www.superdecisions.com/ (20 August 2016)
Crossan, M., Mazutis, D., Seijts, G., & Gandz, J. (2013), “Developing Leadership Character in Business Programs”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 285-305.
Dane, E., Pratt, M. G. (2007), “Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 33-54.
Decision Lens - Enterprise software for prioritizing your highest value projects and uncovering wasted resources (2016), available at: http://decisionlens.com/ (05 September 2016)
Dipadova-Stocks, L. N. (2005), “Two Major Concerns About Service-Learning: What if We Don’t Do It? And What if We Do?”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 345-353.
Expertchoice – For Collaborative Decision Making (2014), available at: http://expertchoice.com/ (20 August 2016)
Ganster, D. C. (2005), “Executive job demands: Suggestions from a Stress and Decision-making Perspective”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 492-502.
Giacalone, R. A. (2004), “A Transcendent Business Education for the 21st Century”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 415-420.
Kim G., Lee G. (2003), “E-catalog evaluation criteria and their relative importance”, The Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 55-62.
Liu, D. R., Shih, Y. Y. (2005), “Integrating AHP and data mining for product recommendation based on customer lifetime value”, Information & Management, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 387-400.
Logical Decision – software for more effective decision (2014), available at: http://www.logicaldecisions.com/ (05 September 2016)
Mohaghar, A., Fathi, M. R., Zarchi, M. K., Omidian, A. (2012), “A Combined VIKOR-Fuzzy AHP Approach Marketing Strategy Selection”, Business Management and Strategy, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 13-27.
Priority Estimation Tool /AHP (2016), available at: https://sourceforge.net/projects/priority/ (05 September 2016)
Saaty, T. L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA.
Saaty, T. L. (2001), Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Saaty, T. L. (2008), “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process”, International Journal of Services Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 83-98.
Saaty, T. L., Kearns, K. (1985), Analytical Planning; The Organization of Systems (International Series in Modern Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Vol 7), Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Samuelson, J. (2006), “The New Rigor: Beyond the Right Answer”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 356-365.
Scott, A. (2016), “Europe circles the circular economy”, C&EN, Vol. 94, No. 26, pp. 33-34.
Sonenschein, S. (2016), “How corporations overcome issue illegitimacy and issue equivocality to address social welfare: the rule of the social change agent”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 349-366.
Tam, M. C. Y., Tummala, V. M. R (2001), “An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecomunication system”, Omega, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 171-182.
Wei, C. C., Chien, C. F., Wang, M. J. J. (2005), “An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 96, No. 1, pp. 47–62.
