The Importance of Financial Performance for Evaluating Supplier Performance – a Comparison with the Internal Ratings of Credit Institutions
Ključne reči:
access to finance, SMEs, supplier evaluation, quality, marketApstrakt
Due to changing procurement policies and procurement markets, suppliers increasingly face evaluation of their holistic supplier performance. In this context, the assessment of financial strength is increasingly emphasized. Hence, (potential) suppliers are required to prove their financial soundness towards the assessing (potential) corporate customer. Traditionally, such evidence was only to be offered to banks that create compulsory internal credit ratings. The goal of this paper is to compare procurement in voluntary supplier performance evaluation, particularly the assessment of financial strength, with the procurement when creating compulsory internal ratings by banks. This should on the one hand identify potential concordances and interdependences while on the other hand improve awareness for suppliers. Presentation and analysisof selected indicator systems assess financial strength within supplier evaluation and within the internal rating by banks. Despite the potential different objectives of banks and (potential) corporate customers apparently significant trends of financial (dis)soundness can be recognized as part of the supplier evaluation as well as part of the internal ratings by banks. It follows that hypothesis can be identified which in future work can be empirically tested. The result also provides a start to initiate further research e.g. about a possible (partial) externalization of already existing internal rating data by credit institutions. This then could be used in the context of supplier evaluation reducing overall cost.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Reference
Arnolds, H., Heege, F., Röh, C., Tussing, W. (2012), “Materialwirtschaft und Einkauf”, Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden.
Bieg, H., Krämer, G., Waschbusch, G. (2011), “Bankenaufsicht in Theorie und Praxis”, Frankfurt School Verlag, Frankfurt.
De Boer, L., Labro, E., Morlacchi, P. (2001), “A Review of Methods supporting Supplier Selection”, European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 7, pp. 75-89.
Disselkamp, M., Schüller, R. (2004), “Lieferantenrating”, Gabler, Wiesbaden 2004.
Ellram, L. (1990), “The Supplier Selection Decision in Strategic Partnerships”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management,Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 8-14.
Ellram, L., Cooper, M. (2014), “Supply Chain Management: It's All About the Journey, Not the Destination”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 8-20.
Gleißner, W., Füser, K. (2014),“Praxishandbuch Rating und Finanzierung”, Vahlen, München.
Hirakubo, N., Kublin, M. (1998), “The relative importance of supplier selection criteria: the case of electronic components procurement in Japan”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 19-24.
Kraljic, P. (1983), “Purchasing must become Supply Management”, Harvard Business Review, September-October, Vol. 61 No. 5, pp. 109-117.
Min, H. (1993), “International Supplier Selection: A Multi-Attribute Utility Approach”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 24 No. 5, pp. 24-33.
Schneck, O. (2006), “Lieferantenrating in der Automobilindustrie” (Supplier Rating in the automotive industry), Kredit und Rating Praxis, Vol. 4, pp. 6-9.
Simpson, P., Siguaw, J., White, S. (2002), “Measuring the Performance of Suppliers: An Analysis of Evaluation Processes”, The Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 29-41.
Weber, C., Current J., Benton, W. (1991), “Vendor Selection Criteria and Methods”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 2-18.
Vonderembse, M., Tracey, M. (1999), “The Impact of Supplier Selection Criteria and Supplier Involvement on Manufacturing Performance”, The Journal of Supply Chain Management: a Global Review of Purchasing and Supply, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 33-39.
