DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF DAMAGES AWARDED IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT ARBITRATION AS REGARDS THE DAMAGE CAUSED AND DAMAGES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/10178

Keywords:

arbitration, methods for assessing damages

Abstract

International investment arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism for resolving disputes between foreign investors and host states is also a favourite dispute resolution for investors. It consist of three parts, all of which can be resolved separately. These are jurisdiction, merits and damages. Consequently, it is possible for a tribunal to render one, two or even three arbitral awards, depending on the tribunal decision to bifurcate/trifurcate the proceedings or not. This shows the complexity of each of the stages of the arbitration proceeding. The paper deals with the issue of reparation, specifically compensation for damage caused as the main form of reparation for damage. It gives an overview of the legal issues affecting the amount of awarded damages, the main methods for calculating damages, as well as the applicable case-law and statistics in relation to the legal issues and calculating methods. The paper argues that only a proactive and inclusive approach in respect to determining damages including a detailed fact analysis for legal qualification of the dispute and determination of the best damages assessment methods, can give satisfactory results.

References

– – Expropriation: UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II (United Nations 2012) <https://unctad.org/en/Docs/unctaddiaeia2011d7_en.pdf> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Abadala MA, 'Chorzow's Standard Rejuvenated: Assessing Damages in Investment Treaty Arbitration' (2008) 25(1) Journal of International Arbitration 103

Alschner W, ‘Aligning Loss and Liability: Towards an Integrated Assessment of Damages in Investment Arbitration’ in Carpenter T, Jansen M and Pauwelyn J (eds), The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes (Cambridge University Press 2017)

Antony J, 'Umbrella Clauses Since SGS V. Pakistan And SGS V. Philippines: A Developing Consensus' (2013) 29(4) Arbitration International 607

Dolzer R and Schreuer C, Principles of International Investment Law (2nd edn, OUP 2012)

Hirsch M, 'Sources of International Investment Law' in Bjorklund AK and Reinisch A (eds), International Investment Law and Soft Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2012)

Hoffmann AK, 'Indirect Expropriation' in Reinisch A (ed), Standards of Investment Protection (OUP 2008)

Houtte H and McAsey B, ‘Future Damages in Investment Arbitration: A Tribunal with a Crystal Ball?’ in Caron DD and others (eds), Practising Virtue: Inside International Arbitration (OUP 2015)

Kläger R, "Fair and Equitable Treatment" in International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press 2011)

MacGibbon IC, 'Estoppel in International Law' (1958) 7(3) The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 468 <https://www.jstor.org/stable/755277>pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Mehren RB, 'International Arbitral Tribunal: Award on the Merits in Dispute Between Texaco Overseas Petroleum Company/California Asiatic Oil Company and the Government of the Libyan Arab Republic (Compensation for Nationalized Property)' (1978) 17(1) International Legal Materials 1 <https://www.jstor.org/stable/20691828?read-now=1&seq=3#page_scan_tab_contents> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Reinisch A (ed), Standards of Investment Protection (OUP 2008)

Sabahi B, Compensation and Restitution in Investor-State Arbitration Principles and Practice (OUP 2011)

Schreuer CH, ‘Fair & Equitable Treatment’ [2005] 5 Transnational Dispute Management <https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=593> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Sinclair AC, 'The Origins of The Umbrella Clause in the International Law of Investment Protection' (2014) 20(4) Arbitration International 411

Sinh B, 'Compensation Under International Investment Law Arbitration in Investor-State Infrastructure Contracts' (master thesis, Faculty od Law, University of Oslo 2017) <http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-63194> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Trenor JA, The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration (2nd edn, Law Business Research 2017)

Wälde T and Sabahi B, ‘Compensation, Damages, and Valuation' in Muchlinski P, Ortino F and Schreuer C (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (OUP 2008)

REGULATIONS AND DOCUMENTS

Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) <https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/cafta-dr-dominican-republic-central-america-fta/final-text> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Konvencija o priznanju i ovrsi stranih arbitražnih pravorijeka (NN-MU 4/1994) (HR)

Konvencija o rješavanju investicijskih sporova između država i državljana drugih država (NN-MU 2/1998, 13/1998) (HR)

North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) <https://www.sice.oas.org/trade/nafta/naftatce.asp> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Statute of the International Court of Justice (International Court of Justice) <https://www.icj-cij.org/en/statute> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

The Comprehensive and Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) <https://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/in-focus/ceta/ceta-chapter-by-chapter/> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

The International Energy Charter - Consolidated Energy Charter Treaty: With Related Documents (last updated 15 January 2016) <https://www.energycharter.org/fileadmin/DocumentsMedia/Legal/ECTC-en.pdf> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

United Nations, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly A/RES/56/83 (28 January 2002) <https://undocs.org/A/RES/56/83> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

JUDGMENTS AND OTHER DECISIONS

ADC Affiliate Limited and ADC & ADMC Management Limited v The Republic of Hungary, ICSID Case No ARB/03/16 (2 October 2006)

Anatolie Stati, Gabriel Stati, Ascom Group SA and Terra Raf Trans Traiding Ltd v Republic of Kazakhstan, SCC Case No V116/2010 (19 December 2013)

Anglo-Iranian Oil Co case (jurisdiction), judgment of July 22nd, I952: ICJ Reports I952 p 93

Antoine Goetz and others v. Republic of Burundi, ICSID Case No ARB/95/3 (10 February 1999)

Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Claim for Indemnity) (Jurisdiction) [1927] PCIJ Ser A No 9 (26 July 1927)

CMS Gas Transmission Co v The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/01/8 (12 May 2005)

Generation Ukraine Inc v Ukraine, ICSID Case No ARB/00/9 (16 September 2003)

Georg Gavrilovic and Gavrilovic doo v Republic of Croatia, ICSID Case No ARB/12/39 (26 July 2018)

LFH Neer and Pauline Neer (USA) v United Mexican States, (15 October 1926) Reports of International Arbitral Awards (2006, vol IV, pp 60-66)

Marvin Roy Feldman Karpa v The United Mexican States, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/99/1 (16 December 2002)

Occidental Petroleum Corp and Occidental Exploration and Production Co v Republic of Ecuador, ICSID Case No ARB/06/11 (5 October 2012)

Petrobart Ltd v The Kyrgyz Republic, SCC Case No 126/2003 (29 March 2005)

Process and Industrial Developments Ltd v The Ministry of Petroleum Resources of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Ad hoc arbitration, 31 January 2017) <https://jusmundi.com/fr/document/decision/pdf/en-process-and-industrial-developments-ltd-v-the-ministry-of-petroleum-resources-of-the-federal-republic-of-nigeria-final-award-tuesday-31st-january-2017> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

RosInvestCo UK Ltd v The Russian Federation, SCC Case No V079/2005 (12 September 2010)

SD Myers Inc v Canada, (NAFTA arbitration, UNCITRAL rules, Ad hoc arbitration, 30 December 2002) <https://www.italaw.com/cases/969> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No ARB/01/13 (6 August 2003)

SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Republic of the Philippines, ICSID Case No ARB/02/6 (17 December 2007)

INTERNET SOURCES

Database of ICSID Member States (International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes) <https://icsid.worldbank.org/about/member-states/database-of-member-states> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Gouyon Matignon L, 'Estoppel in Public International Law' (Space Legal Issues, 19 June 2019) <https://www.spacelegalissues.com/estoppel-in-public-international-law/> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

International Arbitration damages research – 2015 (PwC, 2015) <https://www.pwc.co.uk/forensic-services/disputes/insights/assets/pdf/2015-international-arbitation-damages-research.pdf> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

International Arbitration damages research - 2017 update (PwC, 2017) <https://www.pwc.co.uk/forensic-services/assets/pwc-international-arbitration-damages-research-2017.pdf> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Investment Dispute Settlement Navigator (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Investment Policy Hub) <https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Status: Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958) (the "New York Convention") <https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/conventions/foreign_arbitral_awards/status2> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Study of Damages in International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes Cases (Credibility International, June 2014) <https://www.credibilityinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Credibility-ICSID-Damages-Study-June-2014-1.pdf> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Published

2021-07-28

How to Cite

Osrečak, J. (2021). DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF DAMAGES AWARDED IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT ARBITRATION AS REGARDS THE DAMAGE CAUSED AND DAMAGES. Pravni Vjesnik, 37(2), 105–136. https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/10178

Issue

Section

Articles