ODREĐIVANJE VISINE NAKNADE ŠTETE U MEĐUNARODNOJ INVESTICIJSKOJ ARBITRAŽI S OBZIROM NA UTVRĐENU POVREDU I METODU IZRAČUNA

Autor(i)

  • Jadranka Osrečak Zamjenica općinskog državnog odvjetnika u Zagrebu upućena na rad u Državno odvjetništvo Republike Hrvatske, Gajeva 30a, 10000 Zagreb https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0156-8725

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/10178

Ključne riječi:

arbitraža, metode izračuna naknade štete

Sažetak

Međunarodna investicijska arbitraža kao alternativni način rješavanja sporova između stranih investitora i država primateljica investicije ujedno je i omiljeni način rješavanja spora za investitore. Ona se sastoji od tri dijela postupka, koji se svi mogu zasebno raspravljati, a to su pitanje nadležnosti, pitanje osnovanosti tužbenog zahtjeva i pitanje reparacije štete. Slijedom navedenoga moguće je da tribunal u takvom postupku donese jedan, dva ili čak tri arbitražna pravorijeka, ovisno o tome je li došlo do razdvajanja postupaka. To pokazuje koliko je svaka od faza postupka složena. Rad se bavi pitanjem reparacije štete i posebno naknadom štete kao glavnim oblikom reparacije štete. Daje se prikaz pravnih pitanja koja utječu na visinu naknade štete, glavnih metoda izračuna naknade štete kao i relevantnih odluka i statističkih podataka u odnosu na navedena pravna pitanja i metode izračuna visine štete. Zagovara se proaktivni integralni pristup određivanju visine naknade štete koji će uključiti detaljnu analizu činjeničnog stanja kako bi se spor pravilno pravno kvalificirao i kako bi se pravilno odredila najbolja metoda izračuna naknade štete.

Reference

– – Expropriation: UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II (United Nations 2012) <https://unctad.org/en/Docs/unctaddiaeia2011d7_en.pdf> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Abadala MA, 'Chorzow's Standard Rejuvenated: Assessing Damages in Investment Treaty Arbitration' (2008) 25(1) Journal of International Arbitration 103

Alschner W, ‘Aligning Loss and Liability: Towards an Integrated Assessment of Damages in Investment Arbitration’ in Carpenter T, Jansen M and Pauwelyn J (eds), The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes (Cambridge University Press 2017)

Antony J, 'Umbrella Clauses Since SGS V. Pakistan And SGS V. Philippines: A Developing Consensus' (2013) 29(4) Arbitration International 607

Dolzer R and Schreuer C, Principles of International Investment Law (2nd edn, OUP 2012)

Hirsch M, 'Sources of International Investment Law' in Bjorklund AK and Reinisch A (eds), International Investment Law and Soft Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2012)

Hoffmann AK, 'Indirect Expropriation' in Reinisch A (ed), Standards of Investment Protection (OUP 2008)

Houtte H and McAsey B, ‘Future Damages in Investment Arbitration: A Tribunal with a Crystal Ball?’ in Caron DD and others (eds), Practising Virtue: Inside International Arbitration (OUP 2015)

Kläger R, "Fair and Equitable Treatment" in International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press 2011)

MacGibbon IC, 'Estoppel in International Law' (1958) 7(3) The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 468 <https://www.jstor.org/stable/755277>pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Mehren RB, 'International Arbitral Tribunal: Award on the Merits in Dispute Between Texaco Overseas Petroleum Company/California Asiatic Oil Company and the Government of the Libyan Arab Republic (Compensation for Nationalized Property)' (1978) 17(1) International Legal Materials 1 <https://www.jstor.org/stable/20691828?read-now=1&seq=3#page_scan_tab_contents> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Reinisch A (ed), Standards of Investment Protection (OUP 2008)

Sabahi B, Compensation and Restitution in Investor-State Arbitration Principles and Practice (OUP 2011)

Schreuer CH, ‘Fair & Equitable Treatment’ [2005] 5 Transnational Dispute Management <https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=593> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Sinclair AC, 'The Origins of The Umbrella Clause in the International Law of Investment Protection' (2014) 20(4) Arbitration International 411

Sinh B, 'Compensation Under International Investment Law Arbitration in Investor-State Infrastructure Contracts' (master thesis, Faculty od Law, University of Oslo 2017) <http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-63194> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Trenor JA, The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration (2nd edn, Law Business Research 2017)

Wälde T and Sabahi B, ‘Compensation, Damages, and Valuation' in Muchlinski P, Ortino F and Schreuer C (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (OUP 2008)

REGULATIONS AND DOCUMENTS

Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) <https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/cafta-dr-dominican-republic-central-america-fta/final-text> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Konvencija o priznanju i ovrsi stranih arbitražnih pravorijeka (NN-MU 4/1994) (HR)

Konvencija o rješavanju investicijskih sporova između država i državljana drugih država (NN-MU 2/1998, 13/1998) (HR)

North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) <https://www.sice.oas.org/trade/nafta/naftatce.asp> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Statute of the International Court of Justice (International Court of Justice) <https://www.icj-cij.org/en/statute> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

The Comprehensive and Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) <https://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/in-focus/ceta/ceta-chapter-by-chapter/> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

The International Energy Charter - Consolidated Energy Charter Treaty: With Related Documents (last updated 15 January 2016) <https://www.energycharter.org/fileadmin/DocumentsMedia/Legal/ECTC-en.pdf> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

United Nations, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly A/RES/56/83 (28 January 2002) <https://undocs.org/A/RES/56/83> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

JUDGMENTS AND OTHER DECISIONS

ADC Affiliate Limited and ADC & ADMC Management Limited v The Republic of Hungary, ICSID Case No ARB/03/16 (2 October 2006)

Anatolie Stati, Gabriel Stati, Ascom Group SA and Terra Raf Trans Traiding Ltd v Republic of Kazakhstan, SCC Case No V116/2010 (19 December 2013)

Anglo-Iranian Oil Co case (jurisdiction), judgment of July 22nd, I952: ICJ Reports I952 p 93

Antoine Goetz and others v. Republic of Burundi, ICSID Case No ARB/95/3 (10 February 1999)

Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Claim for Indemnity) (Jurisdiction) [1927] PCIJ Ser A No 9 (26 July 1927)

CMS Gas Transmission Co v The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/01/8 (12 May 2005)

Generation Ukraine Inc v Ukraine, ICSID Case No ARB/00/9 (16 September 2003)

Georg Gavrilovic and Gavrilovic doo v Republic of Croatia, ICSID Case No ARB/12/39 (26 July 2018)

LFH Neer and Pauline Neer (USA) v United Mexican States, (15 October 1926) Reports of International Arbitral Awards (2006, vol IV, pp 60-66)

Marvin Roy Feldman Karpa v The United Mexican States, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/99/1 (16 December 2002)

Occidental Petroleum Corp and Occidental Exploration and Production Co v Republic of Ecuador, ICSID Case No ARB/06/11 (5 October 2012)

Petrobart Ltd v The Kyrgyz Republic, SCC Case No 126/2003 (29 March 2005)

Process and Industrial Developments Ltd v The Ministry of Petroleum Resources of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Ad hoc arbitration, 31 January 2017) <https://jusmundi.com/fr/document/decision/pdf/en-process-and-industrial-developments-ltd-v-the-ministry-of-petroleum-resources-of-the-federal-republic-of-nigeria-final-award-tuesday-31st-january-2017> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

RosInvestCo UK Ltd v The Russian Federation, SCC Case No V079/2005 (12 September 2010)

SD Myers Inc v Canada, (NAFTA arbitration, UNCITRAL rules, Ad hoc arbitration, 30 December 2002) <https://www.italaw.com/cases/969> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No ARB/01/13 (6 August 2003)

SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Republic of the Philippines, ICSID Case No ARB/02/6 (17 December 2007)

INTERNET SOURCES

Database of ICSID Member States (International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes) <https://icsid.worldbank.org/about/member-states/database-of-member-states> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Gouyon Matignon L, 'Estoppel in Public International Law' (Space Legal Issues, 19 June 2019) <https://www.spacelegalissues.com/estoppel-in-public-international-law/> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

International Arbitration damages research – 2015 (PwC, 2015) <https://www.pwc.co.uk/forensic-services/disputes/insights/assets/pdf/2015-international-arbitation-damages-research.pdf> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

International Arbitration damages research - 2017 update (PwC, 2017) <https://www.pwc.co.uk/forensic-services/assets/pwc-international-arbitration-damages-research-2017.pdf> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Investment Dispute Settlement Navigator (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Investment Policy Hub) <https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Status: Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958) (the "New York Convention") <https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/conventions/foreign_arbitral_awards/status2> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

Study of Damages in International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes Cases (Credibility International, June 2014) <https://www.credibilityinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Credibility-ICSID-Damages-Study-June-2014-1.pdf> pristupljeno 19. srpnja 2021.

##submission.downloads##

Objavljeno

2021-07-28

Broj časopisa

Rubrika

Članak