THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NATIONAL AND EU CITIZENSHIP IN THE CJEU CASE LAW

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/13652

Keywords:

citizenship of the Union, national citizenship, emancipation of EU citizenship, Court of Justice of the European Union

Abstract

The citizenship of the Union, established by the Maastricht Treaty, became, by virtue of CJEU case law, a fundamental status of nationals of the Member States enabling those who find themselves in the same situation to enjoy the same treatment in law irrespective of their nationality. The paper aims to research how the CJEU expanded the EU law application by using the citizenship of the Union and where it set the limits to this expansion. To this end, following the introductory part of the paper, the issues of acquisition and loss of Union citizenship have been analysed. The third part of the paper researches into the CJEU case law regarding expansion of EU law application through the citizenship of the Union. This expansion was first conducted by eliminating both economic and cross-border links as conditio sine qua non of EU law application. The fourth part of the paper considers the possibility of emancipation of EU citizenship from the concept of Member State nationality regarding relevant TEU and TFEU provisions and CJEU case law. Finally, the paper concludes that CJEU has greatly encouraged the expansion of citizenship of the Union but has also limited this expansion by attaching it to national citizenship, which is in line with relevant TEU and TFEU provisions.

References

Bauböck R, 'If You Want to Make EU Citizenship More Inclusive You Have to Reform Nationality Laws' u Orgad L i Lepoutre J (eds) Should EU Citizenship Be Disentangled from Member State Nationality? (2019) Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2019/24, 1

Becker M, 'Managing Diversity in the European Union: Inclusive European Citizenship and Third Country Nationals' (2004) 7(1) Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal 132

Bellamy R, 'On Mushroom Reasoning and Kostakopoulou’s Argument for Eurozenship' u Orgad L i Lepoutre J (eds), Should EU Citizenship Be Disentangled from Member State Nationality? (2019) Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2019/24, 1

Christopoulos D, 'A Relative Dissociation of Union citizenship From Member States Nationality Needs to Mean Something More Than Long Term Residence Status' u Orgad L i Lepoutre J (eds), Should EU Citizenship Be Disentangled from Member State Nationality? (2019) Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2019/24, 1

Džankić J, 'Eurozenship: Always a Bridesmaid?' u Orgad L i Lepoutre J (eds), Should EU Citizenship Be Disentangled from Member State Nationality? (2019) Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2019/24, 1

Ersbøll, E., 'Let Third-Country Nationals Become Citizens of their Host Member State and the European Union' u Orgad L i Lepoutre J (eds), Should EU Citizenship Be Disentangled from Member State Nationality? (2019) Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2019/24, 1

Garner O, 'EU Citizenship as an Autonomous Status of Constituent Power' u Orgad L i Lepoutre J (eds), Should EU Citizenship Be Disentangled from Member State Nationality? (2019) Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2019/24, 1

Garner O, 'The Existential Crisis of Citizenship of the European Union: The Argument for an Autonomous Status' (2018) 20 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 116

Glibo M, 'Državljanstvo Europske unije' (2013) 46(93) Pravnik: časopis za pravna i društvena pitanja 81

de Groot GR, 'Towards a European Nationality Law' (2004) 8(3) Electronic Journal of Comparative law

Kochenov D, 'A Real European Citizenship; A New Jurisdiction Test; A Novel Chapter in the Development of the Union in Europe' (2013) 18(1) 56.

Kochenov D, 'Ius Tractum of Many Faces: European Citizenship and the Difficult Relationship between Status and Rights' (2009) 15(2) Columbia Journal of European Law 169

Kochenov D, 'More Suffocating Bonds?! Conceptual and Legal Flaws of the Unnecessary Proposal' u Orgad L i Lepoutre J (eds), Should EU Citizenship Be Disentangled from Member State Nationality? (2019) Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2019/24, 1

Kochenov D, 'The Essence of EU Citizenship Emerging from the Last Ten Years of Academic Debate: Beyond the Cherry Blossoms and The Moon?' (2013) 62(1) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 97

Kostakopoulou D, 'Who Should Be a Citizen of the Union? Toward an Autonomous European Union Citizenship' u Orgad L i Lepoutre J (eds), Should EU Citizenship Be Disentangled from Member State Nationality? (2019) Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2019/24, 1

Kochenov D i Dimitrovs A, 'EU Citizenship for Latvian "Non-Citizens": A Concrete Proposal' (2016) 38(1) Houston Journal of International Law 55

Kochenov D i Plender R, 'EU Citizenship: From an Incipient Form to an Incipient Substance? The Discovery of the Treaty Text' (2012) 37(4) European Law Review 369

Lenaerts K, 'EU citizenship and the European Court of Justice׳s ‘stone-by-stone’ approach' (2015) 1(1) International Comparative Jurisprudence 1

Maas W, Member State and EU Citizenships Should be Strengthened Rather than Disentangled u Orgad L i Lepoutre J (eds), Should EU Citizenship Be Disentangled from Member State Nationality? (2019) Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2019/24, 1

Marković M i Vukašinović A, 'Europsko državljanstvo: razvoj, utjecaj i izazovi' (2016) 16(3) Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava: časopis za teoriju i praksu javne uprave 479

d'Oliveira HUJ, 'Brexit, Nationality and Union Citizenship: Bottom Up' (2018) Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2018/49 1

Oosterom Staples H, 'The Triangular Relationship Between Nationality, EU Citizenship and Migration in EU Law: A Tale of Competing Competences' (2018) 65(3) Netherlands International Law Review 431

Peročević K, 'Pojam radnika u pravu Europske unije' (2017) 67(2) Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu 319

Rostek K i Davies G, 'The impact of Union citizenship on national citizenship policies' (2006) 10 European Integration online Papers 3

Schrauwen A, '(Not) losing out from Brexit' (2017) 1(1) Europe and the World: Law Review 1

Shaw J, 'Concluding thoughts: Rottman in context' u Shaw J(ed), Has the European Court of Justice Challenged Member State Sovereignty in Nationality Law? (2011) Working Paper, EUI RSCAS, 2011/62

Spaventa E, 'Seeing the wood despite the trees? on the scope of Union citizenship and its constitutional effects' (2008) 45(1) Common market law review 13

Thym D, 'The Case Against an Autonomous ‘EU Rump Citizenship' u Orgad L i Lepoutre J (eds), Should EU Citizenship Be Disentangled from Member State Nationality? (2019) Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2019/24, 1

van den Brink M, 'EU citizenship and (fundamental) rights: Empirical, normative, and conceptual problems' (2019) 25(1) European Law Journal 21

van den Brink M i Kochenov D, 'Against “Associate EU Citizenship' (2019) University of Groningen Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 4/2019 1, dostupno na https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3338435

Vink MP, 'Limits of European Citizenship: European Integration and Domestic Immigration Policies' (2003) 4 Webpapers on Constitutionalism & Governance beyond the State 1

Worster WT, 'Brexit and the International Law Prohibitions on the Loss of EU Citizenship' (2018) 15(2) International Organizations Law Review 341.

Worster WT, 'European Union Citizenship and the Unlawful Denial of Member State Nationality' (2020) 43(4) Fordham International Law Journal 768

JUDGMENTS AND OTHER DECISIONS

Presuda C-369/ 90 Mario Vicente Micheletti i drugi protiv Delegación del Gobierno en Cantabria (1992) ECLI:EU:C:1992:295 (7. srpnja 1992.)

Presuda C-135/08 Janko Rottman protiv Freistaat Bayern, Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: Bundesverwaltungsgericht – Njemačka (2010) ECLI:EU:C:2010:104 (2. ožujka 2010.)

Presuda Rudy Grzelczyk protiv Centre public d'aide sociale d'Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, C-184/99, ECLI:EU:C:2001:458 (20. rujna 2001.)

Presuda The Queen protiv Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte: Manjit Kaur, uz sudjelovanje: Justice, Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Crown Office) - Ujedinjena Kraljevina, C-192/99, ECLI:EU:C:2001:106 (20. veljače 2001.)

Presuda M. G. Eman i O. B. Sevinger protiv College van burgemeester en wethouders van Den Haag, Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: Raad van State – Nizozemska, C-300/04, ECLI:EU:C:2006:545 (12. rujna 2006.)

Rješenje Općeg suda, Harry Shindler i dr. protiv Europske komisije, T-627/19, ECLI:EU:T:2020:335 (14. srpnja 2020.)

Presuda M.G. Tjebbes i dr. protiv Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken, Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio Raad van State (Nizozemska), C-221/17, ECLI:EU:C:2019:189 (12. ožujka 2019.)

Presuda Ian William Cowan protiv Trésor public, Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: Tribunal de grande instance de Paris – Francuska, C- 186/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:47 (2. veljače 1989.)

Presuda Rezguia Adoui protiv Belgijske države i ville de Liège i Dominique Cornuaille protiv Belgijske države, Zahtjevi za prethodnu odluku: Tribunal de première instance de Liège – Belgija, C-115/81 i 116/81, ECLI:EU:C:1982:183 (18. svibnja 1982.)

Presuda Jean Reyners protiv Belgijske države.Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: Conseil d'Etat – Belgija , C-2/74, ECLI:EU:C:1974:68 (21. lipnja 1974.)

Presuda María Martínez Sala protiv Freistaat Bayern, Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: Bayerisches Landessozialgericht – Njemačka, C-85/96, ECLI:EU:C:1998:217 (12. svibnja 1998.)

Presuda B.N.O. Walrave, L.J.N. Koch protiv Association Union cycliste internationale, Koninklijke Nederlandsche Wielren Unie i Federación Española Ciclismo, Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: Arrondissementsrechtbank Utrecht – Nizozemska, C-36/74. ECLI:EU:C:1974:140 (12. prosinca 1974.)

Presuda I. Bettray protiv Staatssecretaris van Justitie, Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: Raad van State – Nizozemska, C-344/87, ECLI:EU:C:1989:226 (31. svibnja 1989.)

Presuda Belgijska država protiv René Humbel i Marie-Thérèse Edel, Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: Justice de paix de Neufchâteau – Belgija, C-263/86, ECLI:EU:C:1988:451 (27. rujna 1988.)

Presuda Baumbast i R protiv Secretary of State for the Home Department, Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: Immigration Appeal Tribunal – Ujedinjena Kraljevina, C-413/99, ECLI:EU:C:2002:493 (17. rujna 2002.)

Presuda La Reine protiv Vera Ann Saunders, Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: Crown Court, Bristol – Ujedinjena Kraljevina, C-175/78, ECLI:EU:C:1979:88 (28. ožujka 1979.)

Presuda Land Nordrhein-Westfalen protiv Kari Uecker i Vera Jacquet protiv Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: Landesarbeitsgericht Hamm – Njemačka, C-64/96 i C-65/96 ECLI:EU:C:1997:285 (5. lipnja 1997.)

Presuda Carlos Garcia Avello protiv Belgijske države, Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: Conseil d'État – Belgija, C-148/02, ECLI:EU:C:2003:539 (2. listopada 2003.)

Presuda Toufik Lounes protiv Secretary of State for the Home Department, Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court), C-165/16, ECLI:EU:C:2017:862 (14. studenog 2017.)

Presuda Egon Schempp protiv Finanzamt München V., Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: Bundesfinanzhof – Njemačka, C-403/03, ECLI:EU:C:2005:446 (12. srpnja 2005.)

Presuda Gerardo Ruiz Zambrano protiv Office national de l’emploi (ONEm), Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: tribunal du travail de Bruxelles – Belgija, C-34/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:124 (8. ožujka 2011.)

Presuda Shirley McCarthy protiv Secretary of State for the Home Department, Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku podnesena po null, C-434/09, ECLI:EU:C:2011:277 (5. lipnja 2011.)

Presuda Murat Dereci i drugi protiv Bundesministerium für Inneres, Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: Verwaltungsgerichtshof – Austrija, C-256/11, ECLI:EU:C:2011:734 (15. studenog 2011.)

Presuda K.A. i dr. protiv Belgische Staat, Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio Raad voor Vreemdelingenbetwistingen, C-82/16, ECLI:EU:C:2018:308 (8. svibnja 2018.)

Presuda Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real protiv RH, Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha C-836/18, ECLI:EU:C:2020:119 (27. veljače 2020.)

Presuda Suda O. i drugi protiv Maahanmuuttovirasto i L, Zahtjevi za prethodnu odluku podnesene po Korkein hallinto-oikeus, C 356/11 i C 357/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:776 (6. prosinca 2012.)

Zaključci Predsjedništva Europskog Vijeća, Edinburg, 11. i 12. prosinca 1992. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/20492/1992_december-edinburgh__eng_.pdf

INTERNET SOURCES

Dawson M i Augenstein D, 'After Brexit: Time for a further Decoupling of European and National Citizenship?' (Verfassungsblog, 2016) https://verfassungsblog.de/brexit-decoupling-european-national-citizenship/ pristupljeno 28. ožujka 2022.

Kochenov D, 'Brexit and Citizenship' (Verfassungsblog, 2016) https://verfassungsblog.de/brexit-and-citizenship/ pristupljeno 28. ožujka 2022.

Lashyn S, 'Brexit Means Brexit: Does It so When It Comes to EU Citizenship?' (EJIL: Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law, 2019) <https://www.ejiltalk.org/brexit-means-brexit-does-it-so-when-it-comes-to-eu-citizenship/> pristupljeno 28. ožujka 2022.

Peers S, 'Litigating Brexit: a guide to the case law' (EU Law Analysis, 2020) <http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/p/litigating-brexit-guide-to-case-law.html> pristupljeno 28. ožujka 2022.

Govor Viviane Reding potpredsjednice Komisije od 15. siječnja 2014. <https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_14_18>

Published

2022-04-29

Issue

Section

Articles