CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BETWEEN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND CENTRAL LEGISLATION – HOW FINANCIALLY INDEPENDENT CAN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS BE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/22916

Keywords:

public administration, local governments, public finances, municipal autonomy, local taxes

Abstract

Rights and responsibilities of local governments are defined by the central legislature, in accordance with the given country’s rules, traditions, institutions of constitutional and administrative law. To perform public duties they need financial resources, incomes and wealth. Above these, the right of disposition, financial and economic autonomy have to be provided, moreover, the possibility to receive suitable subsidies from central budget. The proportion and guarantees of the income are important too, as the autonomy of local governments depending from central subsidies may be injured. The question of primary importance is that where are the limits of the mentioned autonomy, protected by various constitutional provisions and international legal documents, how the legislature is able to control the law of taxation, to enter transactions that give rise to debts, or how to withdraw different resources from local governments. The central withdrawal and reallocation of resources may raise the issue of local government solidarity. As well as the extent to which the property and income of local governments can be limited. According to the practice of the various constitutional courts and the supreme courts (American, French, German and Hungarian judicature), the rights and authorities of local governments are not unlimited. Although, local governments have to get effective protection, but after all it is the state who determines the content and the framework of relevant legal regulations for local governments. Therefore, within the constitutional framework, the central legislature has a serious opportunity to intervene in protected autonomy by withdrawing or reallocating revenues, assets or subsidies.

The research method of the study is primarily financial and administrative legal analysis and legal comparison: in addition to international, constitutional and legal (American, German, French, Hungarian) rules, the basic characteristics of local government financial autonomy are presented based on the principles worked out in various Supreme Court and Constitutional Court decisions elements, as well as the limitations that said autonomy must face as a result of the decisions of the central legislature. The subject of the research is the financial autonomy of local governments and its legal limitations, which point out that autonomy - unfortunately, cannot be unlimited. Local taxation, own revenues and subsidies can indeed provide adequate foundations for independent local government management, however, since local governments must adapt in the state’s central system of public administration and public finances, therefore, within the constitutional framework, the central legislation can make decisions that adversely affect their incomes, budgets and assets.

References

Bailey S & Elliott M, ‘Taking Local Government Seriously: Democracy, Autonomy and the Constitution’ (2009) 68 Cambridge Law Journal 436

Bonney R, ‘The Rise of the Fiscal State in Europe, c. 1200–1815’ in Bonney R (ed.), The Rise of the Fiscal State in Europe, c. 1200–1815 (Oxford Scholarship 1999)

Boyne A. G,Public Choice Theory and Local Government: A Comparative Analysis of the UK and the USA (Springer 1998)

Brand D, Local Government Finance: A comparative study (African Sunmedia 2016)

Cockfield A.J & Mayles J, ‘The Influence of Historical Tax Law Developments on Anglo-American Laws and Politics’ (2013) 5 Columbia Journal of Tax Law 40

Devas N & Alam M, Financing Local Government (Commonwealth Secretariat 2008)

Faber M, Die Kommunen zwischen Finanzautonomie und staatlicher Aufsicht - Vorgaben zur Einnahmenoptimierung und Ausgabenkontrolle in der Haushaltssicherung: Eine Untersuchung vorrangig am recht des Landes Nordrhein-Wetsfalen (LIT Verlag 2012)

Földes G, Adójog (Osiris Kiadó 2004)

Hagen v J and Dahlberg M, ‘Swedish Local Government: Is There a Bailout Problem?’ in Molander P (ed.), Fiscal Federalism in Unitary States (Springer 2004)

Heller F, Pénzügytan (Magyar Közgazdasági Társaság 1943)

Hoggett P & Burns D, ‘The Revenge of the Poor: The Anti-Poll Tax Campaign in Britain’ (1991) 11 Critical Social Policy 95

International Union of Local Authorities, Local Government Finance and Its Importance for Local Autonomy: Reports Prepared for the Rome Congress, September 26th - October 1st (1955)

Isenmann E, ‘The Holy Roman Empire in the Middle Ages’ in Bonney R (ed.), The Rise of the Fiscal State in Europe, c. 1200–1815 (Oxford Scholarship 1999)

Jarrard E. K, ‘Local Government Law’ (2017) 69 Mercer L Rev 205

Kautz Gy, Államgazdaság- vagy pénzügytan (Aula Kiadó 2004)

Kovács Á., Pénzügyi ellenőrzés változó erőtérben (Perfekt Gazdasági Tanácsadó, Oktató és Kiadó Részvénytársaság, 2003)

Lengyel L, Mozgástér és kényszerpálya (Helikon Kiadó 1997)

Leroy-Beaulieu P, Pénzügytan II. (A Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Könyvkiadó-Vállalata 1880)

Lentner Cs, ‘Önkormányzatok pénzügyi konszolidációja és működőképes állapotban tartásuk eszközrendszere’ in Lentner Cs (ed.), Adózási pénzügytan és államháztartási gazdálkodás. Közpénzügyek és államháztartástan II. (NKE Szolgáltató Kft. 2015)

Menyhárd A, ‘A Legfelsőbb Bíróság ítélete a soproni mélygarázs ügyében’ (2010) 1 Jogesetek Magyarázata 19

Molander P: ‘Introduction – Problems of Multi-level Democracies’ in: Per Molander (ed.), Fiscal Federalism in Unitary States (Springer 2004)

O'Hagan J, McBride P & Sanfey P, ‘Local Government Finance: The Irish Experience’ (1985) 1985 British Tax Review 235

OECD The Governance of Land Use in France Case studies of Clermont-Ferrand and Nantes Saint-Nazaire: Case studies of Clermont-Ferrand and Nantes Saint-Nazaire (OECD Publishing 2017)

Salkin P.E & Charles Gottlieb, ‘Engaging Deliberative Democracy at the Grassroots: Prioritizing the Effects of the Fiscal Crisis in New York at the Local Government Level’ (2012) 39 Fordham Urban Law Journal 727

Stephen, H.J,; Jenks, Edward, Editor. Stephen’s Commentaries on the Laws of England. London, Butterworths

Siket J, ‘Centralization and Reduced Financial Resources: A Worrying Picture for Hungarian Municipalities’ (2021) 19 Central European Public Administration Review 261

Szamel K, Közigazgatás az állampolgárért, vagy állampolgár a közigazgatásért (Közgazdasági és Jogi Könyvkiadó 1988)

Tresch W. R, Public Finance. A Normative Theory (Elsevier 2015)

Wildavsky A, ‘A költségvetés készítése mint politikai folyamat’ in Richard J. Stillman (ed.), Közigazgatás (Századvég-Osiris 1994)

Williams W. E, All It Takes is Guts: A Minority View (Regnery Books 1987)

REGULATIONS AND DOCUMENTS

Act C of 1990 on Local Taxes

Act CLIV. of 2011 about consolidation of County governments, the takeover of certain healthcare institutions of Municipalities and of the Capital;

Act CLXXXIX of 2011 on the local governments of Hungary

Act CXCIV of 2011 about the Economic stability of Hungary

Act CXCVI of 2011 on National Assets

Act XX of 1949 s 9(1) on the Constitution of the Republic of Hungary

Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany (Grundgesetz)

Bundeshaushaltsordnung vom 19. August 1969 (BGBl. I S. 1284)

Constitution of France (Constitution française du 4 octobre 1958.)

Fundamental Law of Hungary (Magyarország Alaptörvénye)

Gemeindeordnung für den Freistaat Bayern (Gemeindeordnung – GO) in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 22. August 1998 (GVBl. S. 796)

Gemeindeordnung (GO) in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 22. August 1998 (GVBl. S. 796, BayRS 2020-1-1-I)

Government Resolution 1943/2017 (XII. 12.) on the support of local government

Government decree No. 639/2020. (XII. 22.), No. 535/2020. (XII. 1.) and No. 512/2020. (XI. 21.)

The European Charter of Local Self-Government, signed in Strasbourg on 15 October 1985. (In the Hungarian legal system, promulgated by Act XV of 1997)

JUDICIAL PRACTICE

Covington v. Kentucky 173 US 231 (1899)

Commissioners of Laramie County v. Commissioners of Albany County et al. 92 US 307 (1876)

Decision No. Bfv.III.502/2019/5. of the Curia of Hungary

Decision No. Köf.5.083/2012/4. of the Municipal Council of The Curia of Hungary

Decision No. Köf.5.083/2012/4. of the Curia of Hungary

Decision No. Pfv.II.20.042/2021/9. of the Curia of Hungary

Hunter v. Pittsburgh. 207 US 161 (1907)

Joined Cases C–283 and 312/06 KÖGÁZ rt and Others v. Zala Megyei Közigazgatási Hivatal Vezetője and OTP Garancia Biztosító rt v. Vas Megyei Közigazgátasi Hivatal [2007] ECR I-8463

The Constitutional Court of Hungary 3105/2014. (IV. 17.) [2014], ABH 2014 546

The Constitutional Court of Hungary 8/2021. (III. 2.) [2021], ABH 202 689

The Constitutional Court of Hungary 3311/2019. (XI. 21.) [2019], ABH 2019 2105

The Constitutional Court of Hungary 41/2005. (X. 27.) [2005] ABH 2005 459

INTERNET SOURCES

State Audit Office of Hungary ‘Financial Control of the Local Governments’ accessed 2 May 2022

Downloads

Published

2023-02-03

Issue

Section

Articles