QUESTIONING ANIMALS’ STATUS AS OBJECTS OF PROPERTY RIGHTS IN CROATIAN AND COMPARATIVE PROPERTY LAW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/25355Keywords:
animals, thing, property (rights), ownership, legal rights, legal personhoodAbstract
The proper coexistence of humans and other members of the living world is one of the essential preconditions for forming the rule of law. Through the influence of the biocentric concept, under the auspices of bioethical and animal-ethical thinking, the legal regulation of humans and animals develops within the framework of animal law as a relatively new branch of law. One of the central topics within the mentioned legal branch is the discussion of animals as objects of property (proprietary) rights and, potentially, as holders of certain legal rights. The above represents a significant challenge to property law and the theoretical foundations of civil law, given that the Croatian Ownership and Other Proprietary Rights Act does not explicitly mention the status of an animal, but the status of an animal as a thing derives from the Croatian property law doctrine. The paper analytically, historically and comparatively examines the current legal status of animals as objects of property rights. Historical insight refers to the development of the paradigmatic position of animals as things established in Roman private law. Analytical elaboration of current property law statutory provisions and reflection of property law doctrine are placed in the comparative legal context of the civil law provisions of those countries that have recognized animals as non-things or as sentient beings.
References
Berger A Encyclopedic Dictionary Of Roman Law (First ed, The American Philosophical Society, Phil- adelphia, 1953)
Birnhack M and Morse T, ‘Digital Remains: Property or Privacy?’ (2022) 30 (2) International Jour- nal of Law & Information Technology, 280–301
Boemke B and Ulrici B, BGB Allgemeiner Teil (Springer, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York, 2009)
Bydlinski P, Bürgerliches Recht, Band I, Allgemeiner Teil (4th ed, Springer, Wien, New York, 2007)
Bydlinski P, ‘Das Tier, (k)eine Sache?’ (1988) RdW Lexis Nexis 157
DeGrazia D, Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status (First ed, Cambridge University, 1996)
Eliza M, ‘AI as a Legal Person?’ in Jyh-An Lee, Reto Hilty, and Kung-Chung Liu (eds), Artificial Intel- ligence and Intellectual Property (Oxford, 2021) 419–440
Favre D, ‘Equitable self-ownership for animals’ (2000) 50 (2) Duke Law Journal, 473–502
Favre D, ‘Living Property: A New Status for Animals Within the Legal System’ (2010) 93 (3) Mar- quette Law Review, 1021–1070
Francione GL, Animals, Property and the Law (First published in 1995, Reprinted in 2007, Temple University Press, Philadelphia)
Francione GL and Charlton A, Animals Rights: The Abolitionist Approach (First ed, Exempla Press)
Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius (Francis De Zulueta tr, Volume 1, Oxford University Press, Oxford)
Gavella N, Privatno pravo (First ed, Narodne novine, Zagreb, 2019)
Gavella N, Josipović T, Gliha I, Belaj V, Stipković Z, Stvarno pravo (Sec ed, Vol. 1, Narodne novine, Zagreb, 2007)
Harbinja E, Digital Death, Digital Assets and Post-Mortem privacy (First ed, Edinburgh University Press, 2023) 16–51
Jennison G, Animals for Show and Pleasure in Ancient Rome (Manchester University Press, 1937)
Jurić H, ‘Životinjska duša i životinjska prava, Pitanja i odgovori o filozofiji Hansa Jonasa’ (2009) 6 (12), Arhe 107–120
Justinian, The Digest of Justinian (Alan Watson tr, Volume 4, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia)
Justinian, The Institutes of Justinian (J. B. Moyle tr, 5th ed., Oxford, 1913)
Kaluđerović Ž, ‘Bioetički pristupi životinjama’ (2009) 18 (3–4) Socijalna ekologija 311–322
Klarić P and Vedriš M, Građansko pravo (Fourteenth ed, Narodne novine, Zagreb, 2014)
Koziol H, Bydlinski P and Bollenberger R (eds), Kurzkommentar zum ABGB, Allgemeines bürgerliches Gesetzbuch,Ehegesetz, Konsumentenschutzgesetz, IPR-Gesetz, Rom I- und Rom II-VO (Springer, Wien, New York, 2010)
Kramer M, ‘Do Animals and Dead People Have Legal Rights?’ (2011) 14 (1) Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 29–54
Kurki VAJ, ‘Animals, Slaves, and Corporations: Analyzing Legal Thinghood’ (2017) 18 (5) German Law Journal, 1069–1090
Kurki VAJ, ‘Why Things Can Hold Rights: Reconceptualizing the Legal Person’, In: Visa A.J. Kurki and Tomasz Pietrzykowski (eds.), Legal Personhood: Animals, Artificial Intelligence and the Unborn (Springer, Cham, Law and Philosophy Library 119) 69–89
Nedić T, ‘Pravni sustav zaštite života, zdravlja i dobrobiti životinja – bioetički pristup u pravnom okviru’ (2018) 27 (1) Socijalna ekologija, 71–94
Page, TE, Capps E and Denham Rouse WH (eds), Remains of Old Latin, Lucilius, Twelve Tables (Eric Herbert Warmington tr, The Loeb Classical Library No. 329, Harvard University Press, 1938)
Petrak M, Traditio iuridica, Verba Iuris (Vol. II, Novi informator, Zagreb, 2016)
Pichler D, ‘Novo stvarnopravno uređenje lovišta’ (2019) 40 (1) Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučiliš- ta u Rijeci, 481–498
Pichler D and Nedić T, ‘The Most Important Civil Law Aspects of Relations Between Humans and Animals in Croatian Law’, in: Knežević S and Natić M, (eds.), Law and Multidisciplinarity, (Collection of papers from the International Scientific Conference Held on 12–13 April 2019, Niš, Serbia, Fac- ulty of Law, University of Niš, Niš, 2020) 71–81
Regan T, Defending Animal Rights, (Reprint edition, University of Illinois Press, 2006)
Romac A, Izvori rimskog prava (Informator, Zagreb, 1973)
Romac A, Rječnik rimskog prava (Sec ed, Informator, Zagreb, 1983)
Stanković O, Stvar, in Enciklopedija imovinskog prava i prava udruženog rada (Vol III, Novinsko-iz- davačka ustanova, Službeni list SFRJ, Belgrade, 1978) 665–671
Stojčević D, Rimsko privatno pravo (Fiftheenth ed, Savremena Administracija, Belgrade, 1988)
Stojčević D and Romac A, Dicta et Regulae Iuris, (Sec ed, Savremena administracija, Belgrade, 1971)
Stojanović D, ‘Prava za životinje. K normativnom reguliranju suživota ljudi i životinja na pozadini paralelne primjene dvaju interpretativnih pristupa’ (2013) 33 (1) Filozofska istraživanja, 167–182
Van Erp S ‘Ownership of Digital Assets?’ (2016), 5, (2) European Property Law Journal, 73–76
Van Erp S ‘Ownership of Digital Assets’ (2016) 5 (2) Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 73
Ziemianin K, ‘Civil legal personality of artificial intelligence: Future or utopia?’ (2021) 10 (2) Inter- net Policy Review 1–22
Zimmermann R, The Law of Obligations, Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition (First ed, Juta & Co, Ltd, Cape Town, Wetton, Johannesburg, 1900)
REGULATIONS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
The Animal Protection Act, Official Gazette No. 102/2017, 32/2019 (HR)
The Animal Welfare (Sentience) Act 2022, (UK) <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2022/22/ enacted> acceseed 24 January 2023
The Austrian Civil Code, Allgemeines Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (ABGB), 1812, (A), Art. 285
The Basic Ownership Relations Act, 6/1980, 36/1990, Official Gazette, No. 53/1991, 92/1994 (HR)
The Belgian Civil Code, 2007, (B) <http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/img_l/pdf/2020/02/04/ 2020A20347_F.pdf> acceseed 23 January 2023
The Civil Code of the Czech Republic, Law 89/2012 (CZ) <https://is.muni.cz/el/1422/jaro2013/ SOC038/um/Civil-Code_EN.pdf> acceseed 21 January 2023
The Civil Code of the Republic of Moldova, of June 6, 2002 No. 1107-XV, (MD) acceseed 22 January 2023
The Civil Code Of Québec, (CDN) <https://www.legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/en/pdf/cs/CCQ-1991.pdf> acceseed 22 January 2023
The Colombian Civil Code, (Código civil), Diario Oficial No. 49747 del 06 de enero de 2016. (CO)
<https://www.alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur/normas/Norma1.jsp?i=64468#2> acceseed 24 January 2023
The Dutch Civil Code, 1992 (Burgerlijk Wetboek), (NL) <http://www.dutchcivillaw.com/civilcode- general.htm> acceseed 21 January 2023
The French Civil Code, (Code Civil) (F) <https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/texte_lc/LEGI- TEXT000006070721/> acceseed 23 January 2023
The Freshwater Fisheries Act (Official Gazzette, No. 63/2019) (HR)
The German Civil Code, Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, BGB, 1896, (D) Art. 90, <https://www.geset- ze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/> accessed 16 January 2023
The Hunting Act, Official Gazette, No. 99/2018, 32/2019, 32/2020 (HR)
The Nature Protection Act, Official Gazzette, No. 80/2013, 15/2018, 14/2019, 127/2019 (HR)
The Ownership and the Other Proprietary Rights Act (Official Gazette, No. 91/1996, 68/1998, 137/1999, 22/2000, 73/2000, 129/2000, 114/2001, 79/2006, 141/2006, 146/2008, 38/2009,
/2009, 143/2012, 152/2014, 81/2015, 94/2017) (HR)
The Sea Fisheries Act (Official Gazzette, No. 62/2017, 130/2017, 14/2019) (HR)
The Spanish Civil Code, 2016, (E) <https://www.conceptosjuridicos.com/codigo-civil-articu- lo-333-bis/> acceseed 23 January 2023
The Swiss Civil Code, SR/RS 210, Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB) (CH) <https://www.fedlex. admin.ch/eli/cc/24/233_245_233/en> acceseed 20 January 2023
JUDGMENTS AND OTHER DECISION
The Supreme Court, Rev-1816/90 (5 December 1990) (HR)
The Supreme Court, Rev-2070/92 (16 December 1992) (HR)
The Supreme Court, Rev-845/83 (3 November 1983) (HR)
The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia, U-I/4249/2018 (18 June 2019) (HR)
The County Court in Varaždin, (Gž.198/03-2 10 February 2003) (HR)
The County Court in Varaždin Gž-1113/12-2 (11 December 2013)
INTERNET SOURCES
Spain grants joint custody of dog in rare ruling, BBC News, <https://www.bbc.com/news/world-eu- rope-59062132> acceseed 23 January 2023
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Tomislav Nedić, Dubravka Klasiček
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright on the papers published in the Journal, but grant the right of first publication to the Journal. Papers accepted for publication or already published in Pravni vjesnik of the Faculty of Law in Osijek may be published by the author(s) in other publications only with proper notice of its previous publication in Pravni vjesnik.
