PROPITKIVANJE ŽIVOTINJSKOG STATUSA KAO OBJEKTA STVARNIH PRAVA U HRVATSKOM I KOMPARATIVNOM STVARNOM PRAVU

Autor(i)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/25355

Ključne riječi:

životinje, stvar, vlasništvo, stvarna prava, imovina, subjektivna prava, pravna osobnost

Sažetak

Pravilan suživot čovjeka i ostalih dionika živog svijeta jedan je od bitnih preduvjeta ozbilje- nju ideje vladavine prava. Utjecajem biocentričkog koncepta pod okriljem bioetičkog i animal- noetičkog promišljanja, pravna regulacija čovjeka i životinje razvija se u okvirima prava životi- nja kao relativno nove pravne grane. Jedno od središnjih tema unutar navedene pravne grane predstavlja upravo rasprava o životinjama kao objektima stvarih prava, odnosno potencijalno i kao nositeljima određenih subjektivnih prava. Navedeno predstavlja velik izazov stvarnog prava i teorijskih osnova građanskog prava, s obzirom na to da hrvatski Zakon o vlasništvu i drugim stvarnim pravima izričito ne spominje status životinje, ali status životinje kao stvari proistječe iz hrvatske stvarnopravne doktrine. U radu se analitički, historijski i komparativno propituje trenutačni stvarnopravni status životinja kao objekata stvarnih prava. Historijski uvid odnosi se na razradbu paradigmatičke pozicije životinja kao stvari uspostavljene u rim- skom privatnom pravu. Analitička razradba trenutačnih stvarnopravnih statutarnih odredbi i promišljanja stvarnopravne doktrine stavljaju se u komparativnopravni kontekst građansko- pravnih odredbi onih država koje su prepoznale životinje kao ne-stvari ili kao osjećajna bića.

Reference

Berger A Encyclopedic Dictionary Of Roman Law (First ed, The American Philosophical Society, Phil- adelphia, 1953)

Birnhack M and Morse T, ‘Digital Remains: Property or Privacy?’ (2022) 30 (2) International Jour- nal of Law & Information Technology, 280–301

Boemke B and Ulrici B, BGB Allgemeiner Teil (Springer, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York, 2009)

Bydlinski P, Bürgerliches Recht, Band I, Allgemeiner Teil (4th ed, Springer, Wien, New York, 2007)

Bydlinski P, ‘Das Tier, (k)eine Sache?’ (1988) RdW Lexis Nexis 157

DeGrazia D, Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status (First ed, Cambridge University, 1996)

Eliza M, ‘AI as a Legal Person?’ in Jyh-An Lee, Reto Hilty, and Kung-Chung Liu (eds), Artificial Intel- ligence and Intellectual Property (Oxford, 2021) 419–440

Favre D, ‘Equitable self-ownership for animals’ (2000) 50 (2) Duke Law Journal, 473–502

Favre D, ‘Living Property: A New Status for Animals Within the Legal System’ (2010) 93 (3) Mar- quette Law Review, 1021–1070

Francione GL, Animals, Property and the Law (First published in 1995, Reprinted in 2007, Temple University Press, Philadelphia)

Francione GL and Charlton A, Animals Rights: The Abolitionist Approach (First ed, Exempla Press)

Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius (Francis De Zulueta tr, Volume 1, Oxford University Press, Oxford)

Gavella N, Privatno pravo (First ed, Narodne novine, Zagreb, 2019)

Gavella N, Josipović T, Gliha I, Belaj V, Stipković Z, Stvarno pravo (Sec ed, Vol. 1, Narodne novine, Zagreb, 2007)

Harbinja E, Digital Death, Digital Assets and Post-Mortem privacy (First ed, Edinburgh University Press, 2023) 16–51

Jennison G, Animals for Show and Pleasure in Ancient Rome (Manchester University Press, 1937)

Jurić H, ‘Životinjska duša i životinjska prava, Pitanja i odgovori o filozofiji Hansa Jonasa’ (2009) 6 (12), Arhe 107–120

Justinian, The Digest of Justinian (Alan Watson tr, Volume 4, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia)

Justinian, The Institutes of Justinian (J. B. Moyle tr, 5th ed., Oxford, 1913)

Kaluđerović Ž, ‘Bioetički pristupi životinjama’ (2009) 18 (3–4) Socijalna ekologija 311–322

Klarić P and Vedriš M, Građansko pravo (Fourteenth ed, Narodne novine, Zagreb, 2014)

Koziol H, Bydlinski P and Bollenberger R (eds), Kurzkommentar zum ABGB, Allgemeines bürgerliches Gesetzbuch,Ehegesetz, Konsumentenschutzgesetz, IPR-Gesetz, Rom I- und Rom II-VO (Springer, Wien, New York, 2010)

Kramer M, ‘Do Animals and Dead People Have Legal Rights?’ (2011) 14 (1) Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 29–54

Kurki VAJ, ‘Animals, Slaves, and Corporations: Analyzing Legal Thinghood’ (2017) 18 (5) German Law Journal, 1069–1090

Kurki VAJ, ‘Why Things Can Hold Rights: Reconceptualizing the Legal Person’, In: Visa A.J. Kurki and Tomasz Pietrzykowski (eds.), Legal Personhood: Animals, Artificial Intelligence and the Unborn (Springer, Cham, Law and Philosophy Library 119) 69–89

Nedić T, ‘Pravni sustav zaštite života, zdravlja i dobrobiti životinja – bioetički pristup u pravnom okviru’ (2018) 27 (1) Socijalna ekologija, 71–94

Page, TE, Capps E and Denham Rouse WH (eds), Remains of Old Latin, Lucilius, Twelve Tables (Eric Herbert Warmington tr, The Loeb Classical Library No. 329, Harvard University Press, 1938)

Petrak M, Traditio iuridica, Verba Iuris (Vol. II, Novi informator, Zagreb, 2016)

Pichler D, ‘Novo stvarnopravno uređenje lovišta’ (2019) 40 (1) Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučiliš- ta u Rijeci, 481–498

Pichler D and Nedić T, ‘The Most Important Civil Law Aspects of Relations Between Humans and Animals in Croatian Law’, in: Knežević S and Natić M, (eds.), Law and Multidisciplinarity, (Collection of papers from the International Scientific Conference Held on 12–13 April 2019, Niš, Serbia, Fac- ulty of Law, University of Niš, Niš, 2020) 71–81

Regan T, Defending Animal Rights, (Reprint edition, University of Illinois Press, 2006)

Romac A, Izvori rimskog prava (Informator, Zagreb, 1973)

Romac A, Rječnik rimskog prava (Sec ed, Informator, Zagreb, 1983)

Stanković O, Stvar, in Enciklopedija imovinskog prava i prava udruženog rada (Vol III, Novinsko-iz- davačka ustanova, Službeni list SFRJ, Belgrade, 1978) 665–671

Stojčević D, Rimsko privatno pravo (Fiftheenth ed, Savremena Administracija, Belgrade, 1988)

Stojčević D and Romac A, Dicta et Regulae Iuris, (Sec ed, Savremena administracija, Belgrade, 1971)

Stojanović D, ‘Prava za životinje. K normativnom reguliranju suživota ljudi i životinja na pozadini paralelne primjene dvaju interpretativnih pristupa’ (2013) 33 (1) Filozofska istraživanja, 167–182

Van Erp S ‘Ownership of Digital Assets?’ (2016), 5, (2) European Property Law Journal, 73–76

Van Erp S ‘Ownership of Digital Assets’ (2016) 5 (2) Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 73

Ziemianin K, ‘Civil legal personality of artificial intelligence: Future or utopia?’ (2021) 10 (2) Inter- net Policy Review 1–22

Zimmermann R, The Law of Obligations, Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition (First ed, Juta & Co, Ltd, Cape Town, Wetton, Johannesburg, 1900)

REGULATIONS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS

The Animal Protection Act, Official Gazette No. 102/2017, 32/2019 (HR)

The Animal Welfare (Sentience) Act 2022, (UK) <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2022/22/ enacted> acceseed 24 January 2023

The Austrian Civil Code, Allgemeines Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (ABGB), 1812, (A), Art. 285

The Basic Ownership Relations Act, 6/1980, 36/1990, Official Gazette, No. 53/1991, 92/1994 (HR)

The Belgian Civil Code, 2007, (B) <http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/img_l/pdf/2020/02/04/ 2020A20347_F.pdf> acceseed 23 January 2023

The Civil Code of the Czech Republic, Law 89/2012 (CZ) <https://is.muni.cz/el/1422/jaro2013/ SOC038/um/Civil-Code_EN.pdf> acceseed 21 January 2023

The Civil Code of the Republic of Moldova, of June 6, 2002 No. 1107-XV, (MD) acceseed 22 January 2023

The Civil Code Of Québec, (CDN) <https://www.legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/en/pdf/cs/CCQ-1991.pdf> acceseed 22 January 2023

The Colombian Civil Code, (Código civil), Diario Oficial No. 49747 del 06 de enero de 2016. (CO)

<https://www.alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur/normas/Norma1.jsp?i=64468#2> acceseed 24 January 2023

The Dutch Civil Code, 1992 (Burgerlijk Wetboek), (NL) <http://www.dutchcivillaw.com/civilcode- general.htm> acceseed 21 January 2023

The French Civil Code, (Code Civil) (F) <https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/texte_lc/LEGI- TEXT000006070721/> acceseed 23 January 2023

The Freshwater Fisheries Act (Official Gazzette, No. 63/2019) (HR)

The German Civil Code, Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, BGB, 1896, (D) Art. 90, <https://www.geset- ze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/> accessed 16 January 2023

The Hunting Act, Official Gazette, No. 99/2018, 32/2019, 32/2020 (HR)

The Nature Protection Act, Official Gazzette, No. 80/2013, 15/2018, 14/2019, 127/2019 (HR)

The Ownership and the Other Proprietary Rights Act (Official Gazette, No. 91/1996, 68/1998, 137/1999, 22/2000, 73/2000, 129/2000, 114/2001, 79/2006, 141/2006, 146/2008, 38/2009,

/2009, 143/2012, 152/2014, 81/2015, 94/2017) (HR)

The Sea Fisheries Act (Official Gazzette, No. 62/2017, 130/2017, 14/2019) (HR)

The Spanish Civil Code, 2016, (E) <https://www.conceptosjuridicos.com/codigo-civil-articu- lo-333-bis/> acceseed 23 January 2023

The Swiss Civil Code, SR/RS 210, Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch (ZGB) (CH) <https://www.fedlex. admin.ch/eli/cc/24/233_245_233/en> acceseed 20 January 2023

JUDGMENTS AND OTHER DECISION

The Supreme Court, Rev-1816/90 (5 December 1990) (HR)

The Supreme Court, Rev-2070/92 (16 December 1992) (HR)

The Supreme Court, Rev-845/83 (3 November 1983) (HR)

The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia, U-I/4249/2018 (18 June 2019) (HR)

The County Court in Varaždin, (Gž.198/03-2 10 February 2003) (HR)

The County Court in Varaždin Gž-1113/12-2 (11 December 2013)

INTERNET SOURCES

Spain grants joint custody of dog in rare ruling, BBC News, <https://www.bbc.com/news/world-eu- rope-59062132> acceseed 23 January 2023

##submission.downloads##

Objavljeno

2023-07-13

Broj časopisa

Rubrika

Članak