CONTRIBUTION TO TEACHINGS ON THE SOURCES OF LAW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/24920Keywords:
sources of law, material sources of law, ethical sources of law, formal sources of law, cognitive sources of law, argumentsAbstract
One of the goals of this work is to point out the efforts of modern studies on the sources of law to reduce the traditional sources of law - material, ethical, formal and cognitive - to formal sources of law. It is argued that the concept of the source of law, which includes the mentioned types and the phenomena they contain, is too broad, and that these phenomena have only the fact that legal norms spring from them. Here, in our opinion, the problem arises as to how to consider the phenomena from which law undoubtedly arises, especially those that fall under the material and ethical types. The problem can be solved by calling material sources legal relations, and ethical sources legal values. In addition, there is another problem that many (formal) sources also have some material and/or ethical characteristics. Likewise, we pointed out the connection between legal sources and arguments, meaning by arguments regulations and what are usually considered arguments (a. a contrario, a. a simile ad simili, a. a fortiori). We proposed a possible list of legal sources, where the main problem is that, in compiling it, it is not possible to apply one (same) criterion.
References
Aarnio A, Essays on the Doctrinal Study of Law (Springer, 2011)
Barak A, Purposive Interpretation in Law (Princeton University Press, 2005)
Benillouche M, Chavrier AL et Delamarre M, Leçons d Introduction au Droit (Ellipseses Edition, 2009)
Bobbio N, Teoria generale del diritto (Giappichelli Editore, 1993)
Boukema HJM, Judging: Towards a rational judicial process (WEJ Tjeenk Willink 1980)
Ćapeta T i Rodin S, Osnove prava Europske unije (2. izmijenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje, Narodne novine, 2011)
Degan VĐ, Međunarodno pravo (Školska knjiga, 2011)
Eskridge WN, Frickey PhP and Garret E, Legislation and Statutory Interpretation (Foundation Press, 2000).
Fábry B, Kasinec R a Turčan M, Teόria prava (Wolters Kluwer, Pravnicka fakulta UK 2017)
Geršić G, Enciklopedija prava (Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, 2011)
Guastini R, Sintaksa prava (Naklada Breza, 2018)
Harašić Ž, ‘(Ne)racionalnolst u sudskim odlukama’ (2012) 28 (2) Pravni vjesnik 7.
Harašić Ž, ‘Autoritet i sud’ (2015) 52 (2) Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu 407
Harris JW, Legal Philosophies (2. izdanje, OUP 2004)
Hazen, OA, ‘Precedents in the Netherlands’, (2007) 11 (1) Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, pristupljeno 1. srpnja 2022.
Lukić RD, Uvod u pravo (prvo prerađeno izdanje dvanaestog izmijenjenog Lukićevog izdanja iz 1995, preradili Jasminka Hasanbegović i Marko Božić, Službeni glasnik 2020)
MacCormick DN and Summers RS (eds), Interpreting Precedents (Ashgate, 1997)
MacCormick DN and Summers RS, ‘Introduction’ in D Neil MacCormick and Robert S Summers (eds), Interpretng Precedents (Ashgate, 1997)1
Marmor A, Interpretation and Legal Theory (Clarendon Press, 1992)
Miličić V, Opća teorija prava i države (Vlastita naklada, 2008)
Pavčnik M, Teorija prava: prispevek k razumevanju prava (6. dopunjeno i prerađeno izdanje, GV Založba, 2020)
Peczenik A, On Law and Reason (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989)
Peczenik A, ‘The Binding Force of Precedent’ in Niel D MacCormick and Robert S Summers (eds), Interpreting Precedents (Ashgate, 1997) 461
Pezo V (ur.), Pravni leksikon (Leksikografski zavod Miroslav Krleža, 2007)
Popović M, ‘Model integralne teorije prava’ (2003) 37 (1–2) Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu 19
Raisch P, Vom Nutzen der u ̈berkommenen Auslegungkanones fu ̈r die praktische Rechtsanwendung (Müller Juristischer Verlag, 1988)
Rotolo A, ‘Sources of Law in the Civil Law’, vol 3 in Enrico Pattaro (ed), A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence (Springer, 2005) 143
Samuel G, The Foundations of Legal Reasoning (MAKLU, 1994)
Stepanov R i Vukadinović G, Teorija prava II (Futura – Petrovaradin, 2002)
Summers RS and Taruffo M, ‘Interpretation and Comparative Analysis’ in Neil D MacCormick and Robert S Summers (eds), Interpreting Statutes (Ashgate, 1991)
Štajnpihler T, Precedenčni učinek sodnih odločb pri pravnem utemeljevanju (GV založba, 2012)
Tarello G, ‘Argumentacija tumačenja i sheme obrazlaganja u pridavanju značenja normativnim tekstovima’ (1990) Zbornik za teoriju prava IV (prijevod Nikole Viskovića i Snježane Šućin dijela Tarellove knjige L’interpretazione della legge Giuffré 1980). 239.–279.
Troper M, Grzegorczyk C and Gardies JL, ‘Interpretation in France’ in Neil D MacCormick (eds), Interpreting Statutes (Aldershot, 1991) 171
Van Hoecke M, Law as Communication (Hart Publishing, 2002)
Vasić R, Jovanović M i Dajović G, Uvod u pravo (Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, 2014)
Vesting T, Rechtstheorie (Verlag CH Beck, 2015)
Visković N, Pojam prava: prilog integralnoj teorija prava (Pravni fakultet u Splitu 1976)
Visković N, Teorija države i prava (2. izmijenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje, Birotehnika CDO, 2006)
Vrban D, Država i pravo (Golden marketing, 2003)
MREŽNI IZVORI
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedent> pristupljeno 15. lipnja 2022.
http://www.fjc.gov/public/pdf.nsf/lookup/CivilLaw.pdf/$file/CivilLaw> pristupljeno 15. lipnja 2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Žaklina Harašić
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright on the papers published in the Journal, but grant the right of first publication to the Journal. Papers accepted for publication or already published in Pravni vjesnik of the Faculty of Law in Osijek may be published by the author(s) in other publications only with proper notice of its previous publication in Pravni vjesnik.
