PRAVILA NEPOSREDNE PRIMJENE U HRVATSKOM MEĐUNARODNOM PRIVATNOM PRAVU

Autor(i)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/13256

Ključne riječi:

pravila neposredne primjene, prisilni propisi, Uredba Rim I, Zakon o međunarodnom privatnom pravu iz 2017. godine

Sažetak

Pravila neposredne primjene prisilni su propisi koji se primjenjuju i u pravnim odnosima s međunarodnim obilježjem. Autorica analizira uređenje pravila neposredne primjene prema europskom međunarodnom privatnom pravu i prema hrvatskom nacionalnom međunarodnom privatnom pravu. Definicija pravila neposredne primjene uvedena Zakonom o međunarodnom privatnom pravu iz 2017. godine gotovo je identična kao i definicija koju je u sustav europskog međunarodnog privatnog prava uvela odredba članka 9. Uredbe Rim o pravu mjerodavnom za ugovorne obveze. Zakon o rješavanju sukoba zakona s propisima drugih zemalja u određenim odnosima iz 1982. godine nije spominjao pravila neposredne primjene, ali je njihova primjena bila prihvaćena brojnim tumačenjima. Štoviše, u ZRS uvršten je bio jedan prisilni propis obiteljskog materijalnog prava koji se smatra pravilom neposredne primjene. Ipak, osim navedenog izričitog pravila iz područja obiteljskog prava, sudovi u Hrvatskoj nisu spremno primjenjivali prisilne propise i u situacijama s međunarodnim obilježjem. Razloge možemo tražiti u nedostatku zakonske regulacije takvih pravila, kao i u činjenici da je ZRS izričito uređivao institut javnog poretka čija se primjena u praksi često teško razgraničava od primjene pravila neposredne primjene te, ne manje važno, nužnosti sudske interpretacije prisilnog propisa kao pravila neposredne primjene. Utvrditi da je neko materijalno pravilo prisilni propis koji se primjenjuje i u situaciji s međunarodnim obilježjem složen je zadatak. Autorica u ovom radu nastoji pružiti neke smjernice za pomoć pri ispunjavanju tog zadatka.

Reference

Babić D, ‘Private International Law’ in Tatjana Josipović (ed), Introduction to the Law of Croatia (Wolters Kluwer 2014) 439-54.

Babić D and Zgrabljić Rotar D, ‘The application of the Rome I and Rome II Regulations in Croatia’ in Emmanuel Guinchard (ed), Rome I and Rome II in Practice (Intersentia 2020)

Bosnić P, Hrvatsko međunarodno privatno parvo: obrazloženje i komentar Zakona, vol 1 (Pravni fakultet u Splitu 1999)

Bouček V, ‘Hrvatski Zakon o zaštiti tržišnog natjecanja iz 2003. i mjerodavno pravo za izvanugovornu odgovornost za štetu’ (2004) 4(10) Hrvatska pravna revija 39

Calliess GP, Rome Regulations – Commentary (2nd edn, Wolters Kluwer 2015)

Chong A, ‘The Public Policy and Mandatory Rules of Third Countries in International Contracts’ (2006) 2(1) Journal of Private International Law 27.

Cordero-Moss G, ‘EU Overriding Mandatory Provisions and the Law Applicable to the Merits’ in F Ferrari (ed), The Impact of EU Law on Commercial Arbitration (Juris 2017) 317-49

Dickinson A, ‘Third-Country Mandatory Rules in the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations: So Long, Farewell, Auf Wiedersehen, Adieu?’ (2007) 3(1) Journal of Private International Law 53-88

Dika M, Knežević G and Stojanović S, Komentar Zakona o međunarodnom privatnom i procesnom pravu (Nomos 1991)

Francescakis P, ‘Quelques précisions sur les “lois d’application immediate” et leurs rapports avec les règles sur les conflits de lois’ [1966] 55 RCDIP 1

Hellner M, ‘Third Country Overriding Mandatory Rules in the Rome I Regulation: Old Wine Bottles?’ (2009) 5(3) Journal of Private International Law 449

Hesselink MW, ‘Non-Mandatory Rules in European Contract Law’ (2005) 1(1) European Review of Contract Law 44

Kunda I, ‘Defining Intenationally Mandatory Rules in European Private International Law of Contracts’ (2007) 4(5) Zeitschrift für Gemeinschaftsprivatrecht 210

Kunda I, ‘Međunarodno prisilni propisi prema Europskom sudu pravde: C-381/98 Ingmar GB Ltd protiv Eaton Leonard Technologies Inc.’ (2004) 6(1-2) Revija za evropsko pravo 55

Lehmann M, ‘Regulation, global governance and private international law: squaring the triangle’ (2020) 16(1) Journal of Private International Law 1

Magnus U and Mankowski P, European Commentaries on Private International Law: Rome I Regulation (Sellier 2017)

Martiny D, ‘Rom I-VO Art. 14 Rom I-VO Übertragung der Forderung’ in Franz Jürgen Säcker and others (eds), Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch: BGB (CH Beck 2018)

Mayer P, Le lois de police étrangères (JDI 1981) 277-345

Nygh P, Autonomy in International Contracts (Clarendon Press 1999)

Rühl G, ‘Commercial Agents, Minimum Harmonization and Overriding Mandatory Provisions in the European Union: Unamar’ (2016) 53(1) Common Market Law Review 209

Sajko K, Međunarodno privatno pravo (Narodne novine 2009)

Siehr K, ‘Mandatory Rules of Third States From Ole Lando to Contemporary European Private International’ (2020) 28(3) European Review of Private Law 509

Sikirić H, ‘Prisilna pravila, pravila neposredne primjene i mjerodavno materijalno pravo u međunarodnoj arbitraži’ (1999) 38(1) Pravo u gospodarstvu 83

Sikirić H, ‘Zakon o međunarodnom privatnom pravu’ (2018) 25 Godišnjak: aktualnosti hrvatskog zakonodavstva i pravne prakse 61

Varadi T and others, Međunarodno privatno pravo (Pravni fakultet u Beogradu 2016)

Zgrabljić Rotar D and Hoško T, ‘Zaštita cedentovih stečajnih vjerovnika kod cesije s međunarodnim obilježjem’ (2019) 69(1) Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu 89

REGULATIONS AND DOCUMENTS

Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980 [1980] OJ L 266/1

Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 of 24 June 2016 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes [2016] OJ L183/1

Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1104 of 24 June 2016 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of the property consequences of registered partnerships [2016] OJ L183/30

Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) [2008] OJ L177/6

Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II) [2007] OJ L199/40

Report on the Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations by Mario Giuliano, Professor, University of Milan, and Paul Lagarde, Professor, University of Paris I [1980] OJ C282/1

Zakon o arbitraži = Arbitration Act (NN 88/2001) (HR)

Zakon o međunarodnom privatnom pravu = Private international law act (NN 101/2017) (HR)

Zakon o rješavanju sukoba zakona s propisima drugih zemalja u određenim odnosima = Act concerning the resolution of conflicts of laws with the provisions of other countries in certain matters (SL 43/1982, 72/1982, NN 53/1991) (HR)

Zakon o zaštiti tržišnog natjecanja = Competition Act (NN 79/09, 80/13) (HR)

JUDGMENTS AND OTHER DECISIONS

Case C-135/15 Republik Griechenland v Grigorios Nikiforidis [18 October 2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:774

Case C‑149/18 Agostinho da Silva Martins v Dekra Claims Services Portugal SA [31 January 2019] ECLI:EU:C:2019:84

Case C‑184/12 United Antwerp Maritime Agencies (Unamar) NV v Navigation Maritime Bulgare [17 October 2013] ECLI:EU:C:2013:663

Case C-381/98 Ingmar GB Ltd v Eaton Leonard Technologies Inc. [2000] ECR I-9305

Conclusion ECLI:NL:PHR:1967:AC1306, Public prosecutor's office at the Supreme Court [NJ 1967, no 3 Alnaty] (10 March 1967) (NL)

Court ruling Pž-2008/04-3, High Commercial Court (16 May 2007) (HR)

Court ruling Rev-x 876/13-3, Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia (30 September 2014) (HR)

Joined Cases C-369/96 and C-376/96 Criminal proceedings against Jean-Claude Arblade and Arblade & Fils SARL and Bernard Leloup, Serge Leloup and Sofrage SARL [1999] ECR I-8453

##submission.downloads##

Objavljeno

2021-12-22

Broj časopisa

Rubrika

Članak

Najčitaniji članci istog autora/istih autora