Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Izvorni znanstveni članak

https://doi.org/10.15644/asc56/3/2

Effect of Rapid Polymerization on Water Sorption and Solubility of Bulk-fill Composites

Nikolina Klarić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-1181-0183 ; Privatna stomatološka ordinacija, Petrovaradinska 7 b, Zagreb, Hrvatska
Matea Macan orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-4532-7368 ; Zavod za endodonciju i restaurativnu stomatologiju Stomatološkog fakultetaSveučilišta u Zagrebu, Gundulićeva 5, Zagreb, Hrvatska
Matej Par orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-2846-1840 ; Zavod za endodonciju i restaurativnu stomatologiju Stomatološkog fakultetaSveučilišta u Zagrebu, Gundulićeva 5, Zagreb, Hrvatska
Zrinka Tarle ; Zavod za endodonciju i restaurativnu stomatologiju Stomatološkog fakultetaSveučilišta u Zagrebu, Gundulićeva 5, Zagreb, Hrvatska
Danijela Marović orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-3104-5749 ; Zavod za endodonciju i restaurativnu stomatologiju Stomatološkog fakultetaSveučilišta u Zagrebu, Gundulićeva 5, Zagreb, Hrvatska


Puni tekst: engleski pdf 431 Kb

str. 235-245

preuzimanja: 283

citiraj

Puni tekst: hrvatski pdf 431 Kb

str. 235-245

preuzimanja: 138

citiraj


Sažetak

Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine the impact of rapid high-intensity polymerization on water sorption and solubility of a new generation of bulk-fill composite materials. Materials and methods: Five materials were tested: a conventional composite Filtek Z250 (3M, St. Paul, USA) and four bulk-fill composites, Filtek One Bulk Fill (3M), Tetric PowerFill (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), Tetric PowerFlow (Ivoclar Vivadent), SDR Plus (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany). Composite specimens with a 9-mm diameter and a 2-mm height (n = 6) were polymerized with a high-intensity curing unit (Bluephase® PowerCure, Ivoclar Vivadent). The control group was polymerized for a total of 40 s on both sides (1193 mW / cm 2 ) and 3s group for 3 s on one side (3053 mW/cm2 ). Water sorption and solubility were measured by ISO 4049 method up to 30 days of immersion. The results were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc correction. Different polymerization protocols for the same material were compared by t-test (p < 0.05). Results: The 3s polymerization protocol increased the solubility of all materials. Filtek One Bulk Fill showed the highest water sorption and solubility values, and Tetric PowerFlow proved to be a stable material with low values of tested parameters. During immersion, a saturation of specimens was achieved in low-viscosity bulk-fill composites within two weeks, while in other materials it was not achieved within 30 days, or more, following the immersion. Conclusions: Rapid polymerization caused an increase in solubility, which could affect the biocompatibility of the investigated materials not intended for the 3s curing. SDR Plus and Filtek One Bulk Fill should not be polymerized with rapid high-intensity curing due to increased solubility that exceeds ISO 4049:2009 limits.

Ključne riječi

Composite Resin; Polymerization; Bulk-fill Composites; Rapid Photopolymerization with Very High Light Intensity; Water Sorption; Solubility

Hrčak ID:

283922

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/283922

Datum izdavanja:

29.9.2022.

Podaci na drugim jezicima: hrvatski

Posjeta: 803 *