Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Izvorni znanstveni članak

https://doi.org/10.17818/NM/2024/2.1

Impacts of Coastal Structures on Sediment Transport: A Case Study of Damietta, Egypt

Ahmed S.A. Ibrahim orcid id orcid.org/0009-0005-4402-9889 ; Al-Azhar University, Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department, Egypt *

* Dopisni autor.


Puni tekst: engleski pdf 1.253 Kb

preuzimanja: 56

citiraj

Preuzmi JATS datoteku


Sažetak

Within the framework of safeguarding Egypt’s coastal lowlands, which face escalating susceptibility to both climate change and human interventions, this study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of sediment transport dynamics and their implications, with Damietta serving as a case study. To achieve this, a thorough review of the existing literature on sediment transport dynamics was conducted. MIKE21 Shoreline Morphology (MIKE21 SM) model was employed to simulate longshore sediment transport (LST) dynamics both before and after the construction of Damietta Port (DP). Analysis of the model output revealed that the model underestimated the influence of waves, primarily originating from the Northwest, on shaping the LST pattern. The results indicate that the construction of DP led to a reduction in average gross longshore sediment transport (GLST) and average net longshore sediment transport (NLST) by 18%, decreasing from 1.1 to 0.9 106 x m3/year, and 42%, decreasing from 0.73 to 0.42 x 106 m3/year, respectively. Additionally, the average monthly GLST and NLST reductions were 17% and 37%, respectively, compared to pre-construction conditions. Consequently, this research underscores the importance of continuous monitoring of sediment transport to ensure shoreline stability and protect surrounding ecological systems. This recommendation is vital for managing and mitigating the impacts of ongoing and future coastal interventions.

Ključne riječi

Coastal Zones; Marine; Sediment Transport; Damietta Port; MIKE21 SM

Hrčak ID:

321426

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/321426

Datum izdavanja:

15.10.2024.

Posjeta: 223 *




1. INTRODUCTION / Uvod

Coastal regions are susceptible to climate change with their hazards [1]. Such areas appeal to development and citizens in spite of the fact that sea level rise will persist throughout the coming centuries [2,3]. Accordingly, the susceptibility of these areas arises from their exposure to environmental hazards so as human activities [4]. Thus, it is of great importance to visualize the climate change impact on such zones, especially the Mediterranean region, which is vulnerable to faster temperature rises.

Sediment transport is a wave-induced-mechanisms that leads to the vitality of coastal management and consequently an escalating need for hydrodynamics studies, which could be achieved by the implementation of numerical models to evaluate hazards [5-9]. Accordingly, such models acquire persistent validation to boost their reliability, where different modeling approaches were established, as sustainable coastal management importance is escalating worldwide. Accordingly, managing such zones is of significance due to their complex environmental hazards as human activities [10-12].

Over centuries, human activities and climate change have induced dynamic changes in coastal regions, where such changes result in spatial changes in coastal systems. Accordingly, understanding the sediment transport pattern changing is crucial for zone management, which can be achieved by investigating long-term wave data via the implementation of numerical models, [13-16]. Coastal erosion, exacerbated by climate change and increasing human activities, poses a significant threat to coastal communities [17,18].

The Mediterranean Sea (MS), connected to the Atlantic Ocean via the Strait of Gibraltar, is a region significantly impacted by both human activities and climate change. These factors exacerbate the vulnerability of its coastal zones to natural hazards, making it essential to understand and predict shoreline changes for effective coastal management strategies aimed at mitigating the impacts of climate change [19,20].

Sediment transport dynamics, particularly near the breaker zone, are highly complex due to the influence of wave-induced currents and spatially variable flow patterns [21,22]. Waves breaking near the coastline play a crucial role in mobilizing sediments, with their characteristics largely dictating sediment transport behavior. For instance, during storm events, steep waves tend to push sediments offshore, intensifying coastal erosion. On the other hand, longer-period waves contribute to sediment transport toward the shore, which promotes beach accretion [23,24]. Consequently, longshore sediment transport (LST) becomes a critical process for understanding shoreline changes over varying temporal scales and plays a significant role in maintaining coastal equilibrium and morphodynamics [25-29].

Moreover, human interventions, such as the construction of ports, harbors, and seawalls, have significantly disrupted natural coastal processes. This is especially true in regions with complex coastal geometries. These structures alter nearshore dynamics, impacting both sediment transport and ecological systems [30-32]. The extent of these disruptions varies based on the type and scale of the intervention, as well as the resilience of the affected ecosystem [33]. Such alterations often result in either sediment accumulation or increased erosion, which reduces the coastline's natural resilience to the impacts of climate change and storm events while also diminishing its capacity to absorb wave energy [34].

A prime example of this instability is the Egyptian coastal zone, particularly the Nile Delta, where both natural processes and human activities have driven considerable changes [35,36]. Seabed sediments predominantly migrate eastward along the Nile Delta, resulting in significant longshore sediment transport rates [37]. However, human interventions, such as the construction of the Aswan High Dam (AHD), have further disrupted these natural processes. Prior to the dam's full operation, approximately 30 million tons of sediment reached the Damietta promontory each year. Today, the AHD has blocked most of that sediment, leading to a sharp increase in coastal erosion [38,39].

Although numerous studies have explored wave and sediment transport dynamics along coastal regions, a critical gap remains in understanding the long-term effects of human interventions on sediment movement. This study addresses that gap by utilizing Damietta Port as a case study, given its significance for both local and international trade. Specifically, this research aims to evaluate the impact of human interventions on neighboring beaches. By focusing on Damietta Port, the findings provide valuable insights into the consequences of human activities on sediment transport and coastal stability.

2. METHODOLOGY / Metodologija

Coastal regions are pivotal due to their dense populations and significant economic and social roles. Therefore, they require thorough environmental insights to ensure sustainable development. In this context, this study underscores the urgent need for high-resolution data to investigate wave climatology and climate variability. Moreover, integrating observed measurements with hindcast data facilitates a more detailed analysis of coastal processes. This integration, in turn, supports informed decision-making and enhances sustainable coastal management.

This section outlines the structured methodology employed in this study, which combines primary observed measurements with secondary hindcast data. This approach provides a comprehensive understanding of coastal dynamics and ensures robustness in the analysis. To further elucidate the methodology, Figure 1 presents a flow chart that illustrates the sequential steps involved.

image1.jpeg

Figure 1 Flow chart of the methodology steps

Slika 1. Prikaz tijeka metodoloških koraka

2.1. Study area description / Opis područja proučavanja

The study area encompasses a 10 km coastal segment, within which DP is situated. Constructed in 1981, DP is an inland port with a depth of 15 m (see Figure 2) designed to accommodate the increasing demands of international trade in the Eastern Mediterranean region [40]. To mitigate sediment entrapment, the port was equipped with two jetties. It is located 9.7 km west of the Damietta Branch [41].

Notably, the site selected for DP has low susceptibility to waves and currents, making it an accreting zone [42,43]. However, the sediment patterns in the area were significantly altered following the construction of the Aswan High Dam [44]. Despite these changes, DP’s location remains characterized by accretion [45].

Several coastal protection measures have been implemented along the coastal line. These include two jetties along the Damietta Branch, a seawall, a revetment, three additional jetties, and eight detached breakwaters parallel to the shoreline. Furthermore, between 2016 and 2019, four detached breakwaters, each 200 m long with 240 m gaps, were constructed over a 1.5 km stretch to protect DP. These defense structures, along with the port, have altered the wave refraction patterns, leading to new erosion and deposition patterns in the region [46].

image2.jpeg

Figure 2 Study area, monitoring buoy, and location of the coastal structures

Slika 2. Područje proučavanja, nadzorna plutača i lokacija obalnih struktura

2.2. Data collection / Prikupljanje podataka

Various datasets describing the study area were collected from multiple sources to ensure a comprehensive analysis. Specifically, the observed data were sourced from the Egyptian Coastal Research Institute (CoRI), previous research conducted in the study area. While the bathymetric information was derived from two distinct surveys. The first survey, conducted in 2010, provided a detailed bathymetric map of the area (Figure 3). While, the second survey, completed in 2011, produced profiles used for calibration and verification purposes. Additionally, nearshore wave data were gathered through a buoy positioned near DP at coordinates 31°30.43' N and 31°45.6' E, located at a depth of 12 m. However, in regions with limited buoy measurements, methods are employed to extend the time series [47]. To complement this, long-term deep-water wave data covering 81 years (1940–2020) were obtained from the ECMWF-ERA5 reanalysis dataset. This buoy recorded data over the period 2003–2004, capturing wave measurements every four hours.

Frihy et al. [48] conducted a grain size analysis using a standard Ro-Tap sieving system, which employed whole phi sieve intervals. Their findings indicated a gradual decrease in mean grain size offshore. Specifically, the mean grain size of beach sediments fluctuates between 0.14 mm and 0.58 mm, with an average of 0.25 mm. However, offshore sediment (i.e. up to 6 m depth) varies between 0.08 and 0.22 mm, where the mean grain size varies between 0.08 and 0.22 mm with an average of 0.11 mm, where the closure depth was designated to be 8 m (approximately 1.3 km offshore).

Tidal data was accumulated to feature that the tidal range is 14 cm with a daily mean sea level variation of 60 cm at Port Said [49]. Additionally, currents data were augmented, where they mainly flow eastwards (i.e. NE-E sector) and westward (i.e. WSW-WNW sector). However, in winter (i.e. November to February), the highest current velocity occurred in January (i.e. 100 cm/s), where the average occurred in winter within the range between 15 and 20 cm/s [48,50].

image3.jpeg

Figure 3 Bathymetric survey of the study area by CoRI, 2010

Slika 3. Batimetrijski pregled područja proučavanja s pomoću CoRI, 2010

2.3. Numerical modeling / Numeričko modeliranje

In this study, the MIKE 21 SM was employed to simulate the LST dynamics along the Damietta coast, both before and after the construction of Damietta Port. MIKE 21, a well-established numerical modeling tool, is recognized for its accuracy in simulating sediment transport, hydrodynamic processes, and shoreline evolution. To evaluate the impact of Damietta Port on LST, MIKE 21 SM has proven to be particularly effective due to its ability to model complex coastal dynamics with high precision. In particular, the software has been successfully applied in several coastal studies, demonstrating its reliability in predicting changes in sediment transport patterns [51-58].

2.3.1. Theoretical background / Teoretska pozadina

MIKE21 SM, developed by the Danish Hydraulic Institute (DHI), is a shoreline morphology tool designed to model coastal dynamics. As part of the MIKE21 program framework, it integrates hydrodynamic and sediment transport functionalities. MIKE21 was chosen for this study due to its global acceptance and proven effectiveness in various applications. Its flexible grid-based structure excels in simulating two-dimensional dynamics, such as waves and sediment transport in coastal areas and estuaries.

MIKE21 is a comprehensive software package that simulates coastal processes through several modules. It includes four main modules: Spectral Wave (MIKE21 SW), Hydrodynamic (MIKE21 HD), Sand Transport (MIKE21 ST), and Shoreline Morphology. MIKE21 HD addresses the conservation of mass and momentum, while MIKE21 SW employs a cell-centered finite-volume technique to solve the differential equations governing wave dynamics. The governing equations in MIKE21 SW are available in both Cartesian and Polar coordinates [59,60], as follows:

Sσ=Nt+(vN) (1)

Where:

Where: N(σ,θ,x,t) represents the action density, with t as the time. (x, y) denotes the Cartesian coordinates x, while v=(cσ,cθ,cx,cy) are the group propagation velocity in four dimensions. ∇ is a four-dimensional differential operator in space (v, σ, and θ).

On the other hand, MIKE21 ST calculates sediment transport due to wave-current interaction and other factors (i.e. turbulence and sediment concentration). MIKE21 ST calculates bed- and suspended-load-transport, using flow velocity Shields parameter, where the vertical variation in the sediment concentration is estimated by a diffusion equation. MIKE21 ST provides the littoral drift gradient, shape shoreline morphology by the continuity equation of MIKE21 SM via the implementation of the one-line theory, which divides the shore into perpendicular strips to calculate the changes in shoreline position due to the volumetric relationship of each strip, as follows:

ΔNΔt=voldAz (2)

Where: Δt: time increment, ∆𝑁 is the distance the shoreline moves perpendicular to its orientation and 𝑑𝐴𝑧 is the vertical area of the active coastal profile in each shoreface strip over which MIKE21 SM uniformly distributes.

For a detailed description of MIKE21 SM and its applications, refer to [53,6164]. These sources offer comprehensive insights into the model's framework and its implementation for sediment transport analysis.

2.4. Calibration-verification processes / Procedure kalibracije-verifikacije

The calibration and verification results were analyzed by implementing statistical metrics, including average (x¯), correlation coefficient (CC), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), bias, Scatter Index (SI), where bias quantifies is the disparity between the measured and computed values, as follows:

x¯=1ni=1nx (3)

CC=i=1n(xix¯)(yiy¯)i=1n(xix¯)2i=1n(yiy¯)2 (4)

RMSE=1ni=1n(yx)2 (5)

BIAS=1ni=1n(yx¯) (6)

SI=1ni=1n(yxBIAS)21ni=1n|xi| (7)

Where: n represents the number of data, x is the measured value, y is the simulated value, and x¯ represent the average values.

2.4.1. Calibration / Kalibracija

Model calibration is an important phase of numerical modeling, through which the model parameters are tuned to force the model to produce output data similar to observed data. Accordingly, MIKE 21 was calibrated in terms of wave height, wave period and bed level (i.e. H, T and d). During the calibration process, ERA5 deep wave data for the year 2003 were implemented and the output (i.e. near-shore wave data) was contrasted against the measured near shore wave data of 2003. During the calibration process, 2 profiles of the 2011 bathymetrical survey were implemented and the output was analogized against the bathymetrical survey data of 2011.

2.4.2. Verification / Verifikacija

Model verification is a crucial stage in numerical modeling, during which the tuned model parameters are implemented (i.e. together with input data for an interval different from that implemented during the calibration process) to produce output data similar to observed data during the same interval. Accordingly, MIKE 21 was verified in terms of wave height, wave period and bed level (i.e. H, T and d). During the verification process, ERA5 deep wave data for the year 2004 were implemented and the output (i.e. near shore wave data) was contrasted against the measured near shore wave data of 2004. During the verification process, another 2 profiles of the 2011 bathymetrical survey were utilized and the output was compared to the bathymetrical data of 2011.

2.5. Simulations / Simulacije

Confident with the calibration and verification results, MIKE 21 was implemented to simulate a time interval of 81 years. Primarily, data was introduced to the model, where they encompassed the wave data of ERA5 during 1940-2020 and the bathymetrical data of 2010. Simultaneously, all the structures were introduced to the model upon their construction year (i.e. DP and all the protective structures).

MIKE 21 was operated, where its internal computation utilized the input data. During the internal computation, the deep waves were transformed to near shore waves. Also, during the internal computation, MIKE 21 calculated GLST and NLST for the pre- and post- construction of DP with its protective measures. It is of significance to mention that DP was constructed in 1982. Accordingly, the pre-construction condition prevailed before 1982, while the post-construction condition reflects the duration after 1982.

3. Results ANALYSIS and discussion / Analiza rezultata i rasprava

3.1. Calibration-verification results analysis and discussion / Analiza rezultata kalibracije-verifikacije i rasprava

During the calibration process, using equations 3 through 7, the model demonstrated high correlation values with the measured data for all parameters. Specifically, the Correlation Coefficient for wave height and water depth were 0.93 and 0.99, respectively. Additionally, the Root Mean Square Error values were relatively low, indicating a strong agreement between the computed and measured data. However, a slight bias was observed in some cases, such as a negative bias in wave height (i.e., -0.03). In the subsequent verification process, as described by equations 3 through 7, the model continued to show a high correlation with the measured data. Nevertheless, some parameters exhibited slightly higher RMSE values, as detailed in Table 1. Despite this, the data presented in Table 1 clearly demonstrate the model’s capability to effectively predict crucial parameters for the study area. This verification highlights the model’s potential for providing valuable results in future applications.

The verification results from this study align with previous research in the Mediterranean Sea using ERA5 data. Amarouche et al. [19] reported Bias, RMSE, and SI values for Hs of 0.04m, 0.31m, and 0.3%, respectively. Similarly, Abu Zed et al. [65] using the SWAN model, found Bias, RMSE, and SI values for Hs of 0.06m, 0.22m, and 0.33%, and for Tp of 0.43s, 1.34s, and 0.18%. Elkut et al. [66] also found comparable values for Hs, with Bias, RMSE, and SI of -0.28m, 0.29m, and 0.31%.

Table 1 Statistical metrics of the model calibration and verification processes

Tablica 1. Metrička statistika modela procesa kalibracije i verifikacije

ParametersCalibrationVerification
CCBiasRMSESI (%)CCBiasRMSESI (%)
Wave height (m)0.930.030.180.290.9-0.030.230.31
Wave period (s)0.78-0.291.040.150.72-0.191.260.19
Bed level (m)0.990.050.210.040.990.090.210.04

3.2. Wave climate results analysis and discussion / Analiza rezultata klimatskih valova i rasprava

The computed wave data obtained from MIKE 21 are presented in Figure 4, where the figure represents the long term wave distribution, in terms of direction and height simulated over 81-year.

From the figure, it is evident that the dominant wave along Damietta is propagating from the North-North West sector (i.e. N-NW) sector. The obtained rose indicates that Hs is less than 1 m during 90% of the year, with an annual average of around 0.9 m. However, Hs ranges between 1.5 and 4.9 m during 10% of the year.

Moreover, Figure 4 indicates that the predominant wave direction originates from the north-northwest (NNW), where 40% of waves approach from the sector of 320 to 340 degrees. However, the maximum wave height reach 4.98 m from the North direction, while throughout the year, the waves predominantly approach from the NW 87% of the year.

image4.png

Figure 4 Wave rose of significant wave height at a depth of 14 m (1940-2020)

Slika 4. Ruža valova značajnih visina valova na dubini od 14 m (1940. – 2020.)

3.3. Longshore sediment transport results analysis and discussion / Analiza rezultata nanosa sedimenta na obali i rasprava

The model results indicated that the major annual LST moves from West to East, as the waves originate from the NW. This section elaborates the results of the annual LST, monthly GLST and monthly NLST, as follows:

3.3.1. Annual longshore sediment transport / Godišnji nanos sedimenata na obali

The annual LST (i.e. NLST and GLST) was analyzed and presented on figures 5 and 6. The figures provide the computed values pre- and post-DP construction (i.e. 1940-1981 and 1982-2020), respectively.

During the pre-DP construction, GLST ranged between 0.87 and 1.5 x106 m³/yr with an average of 1.1 x106 m³/yr. During the pre-DP construction, NLST ranged between 0.49 and 1.04 x106 m³/yr, with an average of 0.73 x106 m³/yr. These values agree to previous findings in the study area, where researchers estimated the transport to be 0.66 x106 m³/year to the East and 0.26 x106 m³/year to the West with NLST of 0.4x106 m³/year to the East [43]. However, other researchers estimated NLST to be 0.8x106 m³/year [67], while [68] estimated it to be 0.6-1.8x106 m³/year.

During the post-DP construction, GLST ranged between 0.75 and 1.07 x106 m³/yr with an average of 0.9 x106 m³/yr. During the pre-DP construction, NLST ranged between 0.25 and 0.65 x106 m³/yr, with an average of 0.42 x106 m³/yr. A similar estimate was previously documented. However, Frihy et al. [48] employed fluorescent tracers to designate the annual LST. The study revealed that GLST was 0.85x106 m³/year, while NLST was 0.49x106 m³/year.

Based on figures 4 and 5, apparent was the following:

Human intervention resulted in LST alterations, where GLST was 1.1 x106 m³/yr, pre-human-intervention, and decreased to 0.9 x106 m³/yr, post-human-intervention, with a decrease of 18%. Similarly, the average NLST was 0.73 x106 m³/yr, pre-human-intervention, and decreased to 0.42 m³/yr, post-human-intervention, with a decrease of 42%.

image5.png

Figure 5 Annual LST pre- DP construction in x106 m³/yr (1940-1981)

Slika 5. Godišnji LST prije izgradnje DP u x 106 m³/godišnje (1940. – 1981.)

image6.png

Figure 6 Annual LST post-DP construction in x106 m³/yr (1982-2020)

Slika 6. Godišnji LST nakon izgradnje DP u x 106 m³/godišnje (1982. – 2020.)

3.3.2. Monthly gross longshore sediment transport / Mjesečni bruto nanos sedimenata na obalu

The monthly GLST was analyzed and presented on figure 7, where the figure provides the monthly GLST alteration of pre- and post-human-intervention (i.e. DP construction and establishment of the protection measures) in 105 m3/yr.

Pre-human-intervention, the GLST was 1.45 x 105 m3 in January, while this value was reduced to be 1.15 x 105 m3 with 21% reduction. February value experienced 10% reduction, in terms of January value. March and April indicated a significant increase of 28% and 25%, in terms of February and March, respectively. May recorded a marginal increment of 1%, in terms of April. June, July, August and September marked an increase of 18, 27, 35 and 22% in terms of May, June, July and August, respectively. October, November and December reflected minor decrease of 2, 3 and 11%, in terms of August, October and November, respectively. This indicated that GLST decreased by 2 to 21%, while NLST increased by 1 to 35%.

image7.png

Figure 7 GLST monthly alteration pre- and post-human intervention (105 m3/yr)

Slika 7. GLST mjesečne alteracije prije i nakon intervencija čovjeka (105 m3/godišnje)

3.3.3. Monthly net longshore sediment transport / Mjesečni neto nanos sedimenta na obalu

The monthly NLST was analyzed and presented on figure 8, where the figure provides the monthly NLST alteration of pre- and post-human-intervention (i.e. DP construction and establishment of the protection measures) in 105 m3/yr.

Post-human-intervention, NLST exhibited a decrease throughout the year, in terms of pre-human-intervention. The average decrease was 37%, in terms of pre-human-intervention. Pre-human intervention, NLST was 0.96 x 105 m³, while post-human-intervention it decreased to be 0.49 x 105 m³, with a reduction of 49%. This reflects the immediate impact of human intervention on sediment transport. February, March, April, May decreased by 34, 47, 43 and 9%, in terms of January, February, March and April, respectively. June, July, August, September, October, November and December witnessed an increase of 28, 34, 43, 27, 46 and 37% in terms of May, June, July, August, September, October and November, respectively. These results underscored the dynamic changes in NLST, which emphasized the significance of monitoring sediment transport within the framework of human intervention.

image8.png

Figure 8 NLST monthly alteration pre- and post-human intervention (105 m3/yr)

Slika 8. NLST mjesečna alternacija prije i poslije čovjekove intervencije (105 m3/godišnje)

4. conclusions / Zaključci

This study has offered important insights into the effects of DP construction on LST dynamics along the Egyptian coast. By using simulations that were calibrated and validated with field data from the DP coast, it has been demonstrated that significant changes in sediment transport patterns have occurred due to the port's construction and its associated protection measures. Specifically, the findings indicate that sediment transport predominantly flows from west to east, with the DP jetties acting as barriers, trapping most of the net longshore sediment in the western part and the navigation channel. As a result of this obstruction, sediment has accumulated on the western side of the port while significant erosion has taken place on the eastern side, disrupting the natural sediment transport processes. Moreover, the construction of DP and its protective structures has led to a reduction in GLST by 18% and NLST by 42%. When examining this on a monthly scale, the reductions in GLST and NLST were found to be 17% and 37%, respectively, when comparing pre- and post-construction periods. These substantial reductions underscore the considerable impact of human interventions on natural coastal processes.

Looking at the broader implications, the results emphasize the critical importance of understanding and incorporating sediment transport dynamics into coastal management and infrastructure planning. The reduction in sediment transport rates is likely to affect shoreline stability, ecological balance, and the long-term sustainability of DP. Ultimately, by revealing the complex relationship between human development and coastal processes, this study provides valuable information for future coastal engineering projects. It also underscores the need for careful planning to ensure the long-term resilience of coastal regions.

Based on the conclusions, the following recommendations were suggested:

  • Additional study and monitoring efforts are required to provide a better comprehension to promote the mitigation strategies.

  • Further research is recommended to refine the MIKE21 SM model and incorporate a more comprehensive understanding of the wave dynamics. It will enhance the accuracy of the model and its ability to predict sediment transport dynamics, thereby contributing to more effective coastal management strategies.

  • Environmental policies should be established and protection measures should be established. Future research should assess alteration in sediment transport on ecosystems and biodiversity to ensure management and sustainable development to ensure a harmonic balance between infrastructure and ecologic resilience.

Author Contributions: Ahmed S.A. Ibrahim: Collected data, analyzed, conducted simulations, and drafted the manuscript. Anas M. El-Molla and Hany G.I. Ahmed: Provided subject matter expertise, supervised the research, and significantly contributed to the manuscript through revisions and valuable feedback.

Funding: The study described in the manuscript was not supported by any external funding.

Conflict of interest: None.

References / Literatura

References

1 

Prasad, D. H., & Kumar, N. D. 2014Coastal Erosion Studies-A Review. International Journal of Geosciences. 5(3):341–345. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2014.53033

2 

Satterthwaite, D. 2007The Transition to a Predominantly Urban World and its Underpinnings.Human Settlements Discussion Paper Series: Urban Change-4. 2006p. 99

3 

IPCC 2022Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability.Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Pörtner. H.-O., Roberts, D. C., Tignor, M., Poloczanska, E. S., Mintenbeck, K., & Alegr, K. , editor. Cambridge University Press,; Cambridge, UK ‒ New York, NY, USA,: p. 3056https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844

4 

Almar, R., Kestenare, E., Reyns, J., Jouanno, J., Anthony, E. J., Laibi, R., Hemer, M., Du Penhoat, Y., & Ranasinghe, R. 2015Response of the Bight of Benin (Gulf of Guinea, West Africa) coastline to anthropogenic and natural forcing, Part1: Wave climate variability and impacts on the longshore sediment transport. Continental Shelf Research. 110:48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2015.09.020

5 

Khalifa, M. A. 2011Adoption of recent formulae for sediment transport calculations applied on the Egyptian Nile delta coastal area. Journal of Coastal Conservation. 16(1):37–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-011-0166-z

6 

Başaran, B., & Güner, H. A. A. 2021Effect of wave climate change on longshore sediment transport in Southwestern Black Sea. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 258:2020https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2021.107415

7 

Aucan, J. 2018Effects of Climate Change on Sea Levels and Inundation Relevant to the Pacific Islands What is Already Happening?.Pacific Marine Climate Change Report Card. p. 43–49

8 

Saraçoğlu, K., Ari Güner, H., Şahin, C., Yüksel, Y., & Çevik, E. 2016Evaluation of the Wave Climate over the Black Sea: Field Observations and Modeling. COASTAL ENGINEERING. 2013https://doi.org/10.9753/icce.v35.waves.20

9 

Barbariol, F., Davison, S., Falcieri, F. M., Ferretti, R., Ricchi, A., Sclavo, M., & Benetazzo, A. 2021Wind Waves in the Mediterranean Sea: An ERA5 Reanalysis Wind-Based Climatology. Frontiers in Marine Science. 8:1–23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.760614

10 

Remya, P. G., Kumar, R., Basu, S., & Sarkar, A. 2012Wave Hindcast Experiments in the Indian Ocean using MIKE 21 SW Model. Journal of Earth System Science. 121(2):385–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-012-0169-7

11 

Moeini, M. H., & Shahidi, A. 2007Application of Two Numerical Models for Wave Hindcasting in Lake Erie. Applied Ocean Research. 29(3):137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2007.10.001

12 

Hadadpour, S., Moshfeghi, H., Jabbari, E., & Kamranzad, B. 2013Wave Hindcasting in Anzali, Caspian Sea: A Hybrid Approach. Journal of Coastal Research. 65:237–242. https://doi.org/10.2112/si65-041.1

13 

Chempalayil, S. P., Kumar, V. S., Dora, G. U., & Johnson, G. 2014Near shore waves, long-shore currents and sediment transport along micro-tidal beaches, central west coast of India. International Journal of Sediment Research. 29(3):402–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6279(14)60054-8

14 

Chen, J.-L., Hsu, T.-J., Shi, F., Raubenheimer, B., & Elgar, S. 2015Hydrodynamic and sediment transport modeling of New River Inlet (NC) under the interaction of tides and waves. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans. 120:4028–4047. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010425

15 

Van Rijn, L. C., Professor, J. S. R. A., Engineer, J. V. D. W., & J.R., D. 2013Coastal sediment dynamics: recent advances and future research needs. Journal of Hydraulic Research. 51(5):475–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2013.849297

16 

Keshtpoor, M., Puleo, J. A., Shi, F., & DiCosmo, N. R. 2015Numerical simulation of nearshore hydrodynamics and sediment transport downdrift of a tidal inlet. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering. 141(2)https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000273

17 

Sawczyński, S., & Kaczmarek, L. M. 2014Sediment Transport in The Coastal Zone. Technical Sciences. 17(2):165–180

18 

Chondros, M., Metallinos, A., Papadimitriou, A., & Tsoukala, V. 2022Sediment Transport Equivalent Waves for Estimating Annually Averaged Sedimentation and Erosion Trends in Sandy Coastal Areas. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 10(11)https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10111726

19 

Amarouche, K., Akpınar, A., Bachari, N. E. I., Çakmak, R. E., & Houma, F. 2019Evaluation of a High-Resolution Wave Hindcast Model SWAN for the West Mediterranean Basin. Applied Ocean Research. 84:225–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2019.01.014

20 

Simav, Ö., Şeker, D. Z., & Gazioǧlu, C. 2013Coastal Inundation due to Sea Level Rise and Extreme Sea State and its Potential Impacts: Çukurova Delta Case. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences. 22(4):671–680. https://doi.org/10.3906/yer-1205-3

21 

Wang, P. 2012Principles of Sediment Transport Applicable in Tidal Environments. In: Davis Jr., R., Dalrymple, R. (eds.), , editor. Principles of Tidal Sedimentology. Springer Netherlands.; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0123-6_2

22 

Reid, I., Carling, P., Walling, D. E., & Webb, B. 1997Sediment Erosion, Transport, and Deposition. Applying Fluvial Geomorphology to River Engineering and Management. 2017

23 

Howd, P. 1998Beach Processes and Sedimentation, Second Edition. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. 79(19)https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1029/98EO00170

24 

Baldock, T. E., Manoonvoravong, P., & Pham, K. S. 2010Sediment Transport and Beach Morphodynamics Induced by Free Long Waves, Bound Long Waves and Wave Groups. Coastal Engineering. 57(10):898–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2010.05.006

25 

Yadav, A., & Dodamani, B. M. 2019Estimation of Longshore Sediment Transport Rate : A Review.Proceedings Of International Conference on Hydraulics, Water Resources and Coastal Engineering (Hydro2016), CWPRS Pune, India 8th –. 2016p. 1832–1842

26 

Quadrado, G. P., & Goulart, E. S. 2020Longshore Sediment Transport: Predicting Rates in Dissipative Sandy Beaches at Southern Brazil. SN Applied Sciences. 2(8):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03223-x

27 

Ahmed, M. T. T., Sato, S., & Tajima, Y. 2014Quantitative Estimation of Longshore Sediment Transport Based on Thermoluminescence: Two Case Studies around Tenryu and Nile River Mouths. Journal of Coastal Research. 30(3):537–547. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-13-00050.1

28 

Chowdhury, P., Behera, M. R., & Reeve, D. E. 2020Future Wave-Climate Driven Longshore Sediment Transport along the Indian Coast. Climatic Change. 162(2):405–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02693-7

29 

Varangalil, N., Kankara, R. S., & Rasheed, K. 2018Estimation of Longshore Sediment Transport Rate for a Typical Pocket Beach Along West Coast of India. Marine Geodesy. 41:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490419.2017.1422818

30 

Mayer-Pinto, M., Cole, V. J., Johnston, E. L., Bugnot, A., Hurst, H., Airoldi, L., Glasby, T. M., & Dafforn, K. A. 2018Functional and Structural Responses to Marine Urbanisation. Environmental Research Letters. 13(1):14009https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa98a5

31 

Bulleri, F., & Chapman, M. G. 2010The Introduction of Coastal Infrastructure as a Driver of Change in Marine Environments. Journal of Applied Ecology. 47(1):26–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01751.x

32 

Mercader, M., Rider, M., Cheminée, A., Pastor, J., Zawadzki, A., Mercière, A., Crec’hriou, R., Verdoit-Jarraya, M., & Lenfant, P. 2018Spatial Distribution of Juvenile Fish along an Artificialized Seascape, Insights from Common Coastal Species in the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Marine Environmental Research. 137:60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.02.030

33 

Pardal-Souza, A. L., Dias, G. M., Jenkins, S. R., Ciotti, Á. M., & Christofoletti, R. A. 2017Shading Impacts by Coastal Infrastructure on Biological Communities from Subtropical Rocky Shores. Journal of Applied Ecology. 54(3):826–835. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12811

34 

Bernatchez, P., & Fraser, C. 2012Evolution of Coastal Defence Structures and Consequences for Beach Width Trends, Québec, Canada. Journal of Coastal Research. 28(6):1550–1566. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-10-00189.1

35 

Iskander, M. M. 2021Stability of the Northern Coast of Egypt under the Effect of Urbanization and Climate Change. Water Science. 35(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/11104929.2020.1864255

36 

Stanley, D. J., & Warne, A. G. 1993Nile Delta: Recent Geological Evolution and Human Impact. Science. 260(5108):628–634. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.260.5108.628

37 

Inman, D. L., & Jenkins, S. A. 1984The Nile littoral cell and Man’s Impact on the Coastal Zone of the Southeastern Mediterranean. Coastal Engineering. 198419:1600–1617. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.9753/icce.v19.109

38 

Komar, P. D. 2000Coastal Erosion – Underlying Factors and Human Impacts. Shore & Beach. 68(1):3–16

39 

Masria, A., Esmail, M., Tharwat Sarhan, A., Eladawy, A., & Sharaan, M. 2024Management strategies for complex sedimentation process: a case study using remote sensing and morpho-dynamics simulation at Damietta Harbour, Nile Delta. International Journal of River Basin Management. 22(1):45–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2022.2101463

40 

ASRT. 1988Sedimentation in Damietta Harbor; Academy of Scientific Research and Technology Final Report. ASRT:; Cairo, Egypt.:

41 

Khalifa, A. M., Soliman, M. R., & Yassin, A. A. 2017Assessment of a Combination Between Hard Structures and Sand Nourishment Eastern of Damietta Harbor using Numerical Modeling. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 56(4):545–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2017.04.009

42 

El Asmar, H. M., & White, K. 2002Changes in Coastal Sediment Transport Processes due to Construction of New Damietta Harbour, Nile Delta,. Egypt. Coastal Engineering. 46(2):127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3839(02)00068-6

43 

Sogreah, M. 1982Effects on the Construction of the Port of Damietta on the Evolution of the Littoral Drift. Consultancy Report. 3512029:35

44 

Hesham M., El-Asmar, H., Maysa M. N., & Taha, A. S. E.-S. 2016Morphodynamic Changes as an Impact of Human Intervention at the Ras El-Bar-Damietta Harbor Coast, NW Damietta Promontory, Nile Delta,. Egypt. Journal of African Earth Sciences. 124:323–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2016.09.035

45 

Fanos, A. M. 1995The Impact of Human Activities on the Erosion and Accretion of the Nile Delta Coast. Journal of Coastal Research. 11(3):821–833. https://journals.flvc.org/jcr/article/view/79860

46 

El-Asmar, H. M., Taha, M. M. N., & El-Sorogy, A. S. 2016Morphodynamic Changes as an Impact of Human Intervention at the Ras El-Bar-Damietta Harbor Coast, NW Damietta Promontory, Nile Delta,. Egypt. Journal of African Earth Sciences. 124:323–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2016.09.035

47 

Bujak, D., Carević, D., Bogovac, T., & Kulić, T. 2023Hindcast of Significant Wave Heights in Sheltered Basins Using Machine Learning and the Copernicus Database. Naše more. 70(2):103–114. https://doi.org/10.17818/NM/2023/2.5

48 

Frihy, O. E., Abd El Moniem, A. B., & Hassan, M. S. 2002Sedimentation Processes at the Navigation Channel of the Damietta Harbour on the Northeastern Nile Delta Coast of Egypt. Journal of Coastal Research. 18:459–469

49 

El-Fishawi, N. 1994Relative Changes in Sea Level from Tide Gauge Records at Burrulus, Central Part of the Nile Delta Coast. INQUA MBSS Newsletter. 16:53–61

50 

Abo Zed, A. B. 2007Effects of Waves and Currents on the Siltation Problem of Damietta Harbour, Nile Delta Coast,. Egypt. Mediterranean Marine Science. 8(2):33–48. https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.152

51 

Aouiche, I., Sedrati, M., & Anthony, E. J. 2023Modelling of Sediment Transport and Deposition in Generating River-Mouth Closure: Oum-Errabia River, Morocco. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 11:https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11112051

52 

Athira, A., & Lekshmi, A. 2023Assessment of Longshore Sediment Transport Using LITPACK, 1177-1186. https://doi.org/10.59544/sqzt6762/ngcesi23p134

53 

Seenath, A. 2022A new approach for incorporating sea-level rise in hybrid 2D/one-line shoreline models. Scientific Reports. 12(1):18074https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23043-w

54 

Bandizadeh Sharif, M., Gorbanpour, A. H., Ghassemi, H., & He, G. Assessment of sediment accumulation inside the harbour basin in the development plan due to longshore sediment transport (LST) rate. A case study of Genaveh port. Ships and Offshore Structures. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2024.2303172

55 

Sadeghi, M., Torabi Azad, M., & Sadeghifar, T. 2024Simulation of Sediment Transport rate using MIKE Software (Case Study:Karri port, Bushehr Province). Nivar. 48124125:12–30. https://doi.org/10.30467/nivar.2024.425629.1272

56 

El Shinnawy, I. A., Abo Zed, A. I., Ali, M. A., Deabes, E. A., & Abdel-Gawad, S. 2010Vulnerability to climate changes and adaptation assessment for coastal zones of Egypt.Proceeding of the First International Journal on Coastal Zone Management of River Deltas and Low Land Coastlines. Alexandria, Egypt,: 6:p. 145–160

57 

Seenath, A. 2022On Simulating Shoreline Evolution using a Hybrid 2D/One-Line Model. Coastal Engineering. 178:104216https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2022.104216

58 

Eldeberky, Y., & Hünicke, B. 2015Vulnerability of the Nile Delta to Recent and Future Climate Change.E-Proceedings of the 36th IAHR World Congress 2015. p. 28

59 

Komen, G. J. L., Cavaleri, M., Donelan, K., Hasselmann, S., & PAEM, J. 1994Dynamics and Modelling of Ocean Waves. Cambridge University Press, UK.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628955

60 

Young, I. R. 1999Wind Generated Ocean Waves. Elsevier. 2:https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:129891655

61 

Seenath, A., & Dale, J. 2024On the Bruun Rule suitability for modelling shoreline change. Ocean & Coastal Management. 255:107237https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107237

62 

Ibrahim, A. S. A., El Molla, A. M., & Ahmed, H. G. I. 2024Modelling Longshore Sediment Transport for Sustainable Coastal Management in Damietta Port Area. Journal of ETA Maritime Science. 12(2):116–127. https://doi.org/10.4274/jems.2024.35119

63 

DHI. 2023MIKE 21 & MIKE 3 Flow Model FM – Sand Transport Module,. Denmark,: DHI Headquarters. DHI Water & Environment:; Copenhagen, Denmark.:

64 

DHI. 2023Introducting the MIKE 21 Shoreline Morphology Module,. Denmark,: DHI Headquarters. DHI Water & Environment:; Copenhagen, Denmark.:

65 

Abu Zed, A. A., Kansoh, R. M., Iskander, M. M., & Elkholy, M. 2022Wind and Wave Climate Southeastern of the Mediterranean Sea Based on a High-Resolution SWAN Model. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans. 99:2021101311https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2022.101311

66 

Elkut, A. E., Taha, M. T., Abu Zed, A. B. E., Eid, F. M., & Abdallah, A. M. 2021Wind-Wave Hindcast using Modified ECMWF ERA-Interim Wind Field in the Mediterranean Sea. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 252107267:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2021.107267

67 

Tech., T. 1984Shoreline Master Plan for the Nile Delta Coast. Progress Report. 1:143

68 

El-Asmar, H. M., & White, K. 1997Rapid Updating of Maps of Dynamic Coastal Landforms by Segmentation of Thematic Mapper Imagery, Example from the Nile Delta, Egypt.Proceedings of 23rd Annual Conference of the Remote Sensing Society (Nottingham). p. 515–520


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.