Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.31298/sl.149.5-6.5

Sıntaksonomskı prılog klasıfıkacıjı vegetacıje Turske ız JZ Anatolıje: Žarıšta raznolıkostı bıljaka

Hediye Aktaş Aytepe orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-8715-072X *
Ali Kavgacı orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-4549-3668

* Corresponding author.


Full text: english pdf 742 Kb

page 265-278

downloads: 230

cite

Download JATS file


Abstract

Ova studija provedena je kako bi se utvrdili raznolikost vegetacije i ekološki gradijenti na planini Bencik u jugozapadnoj Anatoliji (Turska), koja je žarište raznolikosti biljaka. Terensko uzorkovanje provedeno je u skladu s metodologijom Braun-Blanqueta. Za klasifikaciju biljnih zajednica korištena je hijerarhijska klaster analiza. Ekološka interpretacija definiranih zajednica provedena je metodom nemetričkog višedimenzionalnog skaliranja s pasivnom projekcijom topografskih varijabli. Identificirano je pet biljnih zajednica koje pripadaju različitim tipovima vegetacije (šuma, makija i regresivna sukcesivna faza). Osim gariga, ostali tipovi vegetacije opisani su na razini asocijacije, od čega su tri opisane po prvi puta. Šume u kojima dominira bor predstavljene su asocijacijama Hymenocarpo circinnati-Pinetum brutiae unutar sveze Styraco officinalis-Pinion brutiae (Pinetalia halepensis, Pinatea halepensis) i Vicio lathyroidis-Pinetum pallasianae unutar sveze Adenocarpo-Pinion pallasianae (Erico-Pinetalia, Erico-Pinetea). Obje su nove asocijacije. Poplavna područja predstavljena su asocijacijom Nerio oleandri-Platanetum orientalis unutar sveze Platanion orientalis (Populetalia albae, Alno glutinosae-Populetea albae). Makija je predstavljena asocijacijom Daphno gnidiois-Quercetum cocciferae, novom asocijacijom koja pripada svezi Quercion cocciferae (Quercetalia cocciferae, Quercetea ilicis). Regresivna sukcesivna faza je predstavljen zajednicom Aegilops triuncialis-Clypeola jonthlaspi, koja je rezultat pretjerane ispaše i intenzivne ljudske upotrebe makije vrste Quercus coccifera. Floristička diferencijacija vegetacije na području istraživanja značajno je povezana s topografskim varijablama (nadmorska visina i ekspozicija). Ova studija ne samo da ukazuje na raznolikost vegetacijskog bogatstva na istraživanom području i njegovu vrijednost za očuvanje prirode, već također daje važan doprinos razumijevanju mediteranske vegetacije u Turskoj.

Keywords

Planina Bencik, klasifikacija, Mediteran, ordinacija, Turska, vegetacija

Hrčak ID:

332352

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/332352

Publication date:

18.6.2025.

Article data in other languages: english

Visits: 831 *




INTRODUCTION

UVOD

Plant communities are formed by the plants distributing in similar environmental conditions and form the general vegetation structure in a region. Defining plant communities is crucial in determining plant biodiversity, understanding ecological differentiation, and assessing habitat diversity (Blasi and Burrascano 2013). Such knowledge is very important for the management of natural resources and especially for nature conservation studies.

In order to carry out large­scale studies on vegetation analysis, it is necessary to determine the plant communities at the local scale. In this context, it is seen that studies on plant communities are intensive around the world and have been conducted to a large extent, especially in Europe (Chytrý et al. 2016). As a matter of fact, comprehensive vegetation databases for European vegetation, based on the studies carried out on a local scale, have been constituted, and comprehensive classifications have been carried out. Based on these databases, European habitat classification has almost been completed, and the distribution of plant communities at the alliance level has been mapped (Chytrý et al. 2020; Preislerová et al. 2022).

The number of plant sociology studies in Türkiye intensified in the 1970s, especially with the contributions of foreign researchers. In the following years, these numbers increased with the participation of Turkish researchers who were interested in the subject, and a substantial contribution was made to the vegetation sciences in Türkiye (Quézel et al. 1992; Ketenoğlu et al. 2010; Bergmeier et al. 2018). Based on these studies, some large­scale datasets were prepared and analyzed, such as the Forest Vegetation Database of Turkey (Kavgacı et al. 2021), oak forest vegetation in Turkey (Uğurlu et al. 2012), and western Euxine forest vegetation of Turkey (Çoban and Willner 2019). With the vegetation studies based on these datasets, significant contributions to the understanding of the vegetation and habitat diversity of the country were made. However, enriching these datasets with data from previously unstudied regions is important to better understand the diversity at the country level and to contribute to the European vegetation classification system (Mucina et al. 2016).

In addition to the studies carried out in different parts of Türkiye, SW Türkiye was also subjected to several phytosociological studies, such as by Vural et al. (1995), Özel (1996), and Kavgacı et al. (2017, 2021). However, the Bencik Mountain located in the Muğla province (SW Türkiye), one of the high plant biodiversity regions in Türkiye, was not studied, and to understand the diversity and richness at a regional scale, the determination of the vegetation diversity of this mountain is crucial. Therefore, in this study, it was aimed to determine the plant communities of the Bencik Mountain vegetation, reveal their relationship with topographical variables, and evaluate them in terms of plant biodiversity parameters. The south and southwest of Türkiye are plant biodiversity hotspots, and the study area is located in this region. It is thought that the study carried out at this location would make a significant contribution to the vegetation science.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

MATERIJAL I METODE

Study area – Istraživano područje

The study area, which is located in southwestern Türkiye, is within the borders of the Yatağan district of the Muğla province (Figure 1). The region is situated within the Mediterranean phytogeographical boundaries. The elevation of the Bencik Mountain area varies between 400 m and 1396 m.

The bedrock of the study area consists of marble, phyllite, and schists from the upper Paleozoic and Mesozoic periods (Kayan 1979). There are colluvial, limeless brown, brown, and red­brown Mediterranean soils that exist in the study area (Anonymous 1998).

A less rainy and warm Mediterranean climate is seen in the region. The average temperature is 16.2°C, the average precipitation is 631.74 mm, the coldest and warmest months are February and July, respectively (Meteorology General Directorate 2018).

Field sampling and data assessment – Terensko uzorkovanje i analiza podataka

The field sampling was carried out on the Bencik Mountain (Yatağan/Muğla­Türkiye) between 2016 and 2019. For the definition of the plant associations, sampling plots were taken from each plant formation in an adequate number and suitable size. In addition to the forest and shrubland vegetation in the study area, the regressive successional stage, especially in contact with Quercus coccifera machia, and sclerophyllous forests were also sampled to understand the effects of degradation. The protocol of each plot includes general topographic and other data of individual plots, such as elevation, inclination, aspect, vegetation cover (total and individual layers), and a list of all vascular plants, in which a cover value was assigned to each species according to the cover – abundance scale of Braun­Blanquet (1932).

image3.jpeg

Figure 1. Geographic map of the research area (Abbreviations: Q: Quarter, H: Hill, L: Location).

Slika 1. Karta istraživanog područja (Kratice: Q: predio, H: vrh, L: lokalitet)

For the classification analyses, the Sorensen (Bray­Curtis) coefficient as a resemblance measure and Ward’s method as a group linkage method were applied in the PC­ORD program (Versions 4 and 5). The diagnostic species of the accepted clusters were identified by a fidelity measure in the JUICE (version 7.1) program (Tichý 2002). The threshold of the phi value was subjectively selected at 0.50 for a species to be considered diagnostic (Chytrý et al. 2002). Species whose occurrence concentration in the plots of a particular cluster was not significant at p<0.05 (Fisher´s exact test) were excluded from the set of diagnostic species (Tichý and Chytrý 2006). Species with 50% frequency in each plant community were accepted as constant species, and species with a cover of more than 25% in at least 10% of the vegetation plots in each community were considered as dominant species.

The results of the classification were visualized by ordination techniques in non­metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). Topographical variables (elevation, aspect, and inclination) were passively shown on the ordination plane. Moreover, the topographical variables were visualized by a box­wishers diagram prepared in JUICE. The nomenclature of plant species follows the Flora of Turkey (Davis 1965–1985; Davis et al. 1988) and the Plant List of Turkey (Güner (ed.) 2012). The IUCN categories of the endemic taxa collected from the study area were determined from the Red Book of Turkish Plants (Ekim et al., 2000; IUCN, 2003). New syntaxa were described in accordance with the International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature (ICPN; Theurillat et al. 2021).

RESULTS

REZULTATI

Classification – Klasifikacija

The classification analyses showed that the Bencik Mountain vegetation is formed by five different plant communities representing different vegetation types: forests, macchia and regressive successional stage (Figure 2).

The vegetation table of the communities is submitted in Table 1 (see in Apendix).

image4.png

Figure 2. Dendrogram of the Bencik Mountain vegetation by the hier- archical cluster analysis (1. Hymenocarpos circinnatus-Pinus brutia for- est, 2. Daphne gnidioides-Quercus coccifera macchia, 3. Nerium ole- ander-Platanus orientalis forest, 4. Vicia lathyroides-Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana forest, 5. Aegilops triuncialis-Clypeola jonthlaspi regressive successional stage).

Slika 2. Dendrogram vegetacije na planini Bencik dobiven hijerarhijskom klasterskom analizom (1. šuma Hymenocarpos circinnatus-Pinus brutia, 2. makija Daphne gnidioides-Quercus coccifera, 3. šuma Nerium oleander- Platanus orientalis, 4. šuma Vicia lathyroides-Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana, 5. garig Aegilops triuncialis-Clypeola jonthlaspi).

Hymenocarpos circinnatus-Pinus brutia forest

This forest represents the Turkish red pine dominated forests in the area. It is mainly found between 647 m and 1094 m. Above this belt, it represents a non­homogeneous structure and mixes with Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana at ecotones up to an elevation about 1200 m. It appears to have almost all kinds of aspects with the inclination between 10° and 45°. Soil types are limeless brown and brown forest soil consisting of marble and schist rocks. The general coverage of the community is between 75% and 95%. The community consists of three vertical layers. The tree layer cover is 70–90% with 20–30 m height; the shrub layer is 15–60% with 0.1­4 m height; and the herb cover is 30–95% with 0.6–1.1 m height.

Diagnostic species: Asplenium ceterach, Briza maxima, Cen- taurea cariensis subsp. maculiceps, Cistus creticus, Crepis ve- sicaria, Crucianella latifolia, Dactylis glomerata subsp. his- panica, Galium heldreichii, Hymenocarpos circinnatus, Lathyrus aphaca var. affinis, Pilosella piloselloides subsp. pi- loselloides, Pinus brutia var. brutia, Quercus ithaburensis subsp. macrolepis, Sanguisorba minor subsp. minor, Scandix australis subsp. grandiflora, Scorzonera elata, Spiranthes spi- ralis, Trifolium uniflorum

Constant species: Asplenium ceterach, Briza maxima, Bro- mus sterilis, Carex flacca subsp. erythrostachys, Cistus creti- cus, Crepis vesicaria, Crucianella latifolia, Cynosurus echina- tus, Dactylis glomerata subsp. hispanica, Doronicum orientale, Euphorbia rigida, Galium heldreichii, Hymenocar- pos circinnatus, Lathyrus aphaca var. affinis, Milium pedice- llare, Oryzopsis coerulescens, Pilosella piloselloides subsp. pi- loselloides, Pinus brutia, Poa bulbosa, Quercus coccifera, Quercus ithaburensis subsp. macrolepis, Sanguisorba minor subsp. minor, Scandix australis subsp. grandiflora, Scorzo- nera elata, Torilis arvensis subsp. neglecta, Trifolium campe- stre, Trifolium grandiflorum, Trifolium stellatum var. stella- tum, Trifolium uniflorum.

Dominant species: Pinus brutia

Daphne gnidioides-Quercus coccifera macchia

Daphne gnidioides­Quercus coccifera macchia is found between the elevations of 663 and 748 m. It generally appears in the northern, northeastern, eastern, and southern aspects. The inclination changes between 5° and 30°. It is located on brown forest soil, which consists of phyllite rocks. The general cover of the vegetation type is between 70% and 90%. The vegetation type consists of two vegetation layers. The shrub layer cover is 70­90% with the height of 0.5­6 m, and the herb cover is 10­60% with the height of 0.7­1.5 m.

Diagnostic species: Aegilops umbellulata, Caucalis platycar- pos, Daphne gnidioides, Euphorbia rigida, Lagoecia cumino- ides, Legousia speculum-veneris, Minuartia anatolica var. anatolica, Securigera cretica, Sherardia arvensis, Styrax offi cinalis, Trifolium lucanicum

Constant species: Aegilops umbellulata, Alyssum smyrna- eum, Asparagus acutifolius, Avena barbata subsp. barbata, Bromus sterilis, Carex flacca subsp. erythrostachys, Caucalis platycarpos, Cistus creticus, Crucianella latifolia, Daphne gnidioides, Euphorbia rigida, Geranium lucidum, Lagoecia cuminoides, Legousia speculum­veneris, Leontodon tubero- sus, Medicago minima var. minima, Minuartia anatolica var. anatolica, Oryzopsis coerulescens, Poa bulbosa, Quercus coccifera, Sanguisorba verrucosa, Scandix stellata, Securigera cretica, Sherardia arvensis, Silene odontopetala, Stachys cre- tica subsp. smyrnaea, Styrax officinalis, Torilis arvensis subsp. neglecta, Trifolium lucanicum, Trifolium stellatum var. stellatum.

Dominant species: Quercus coccifera.

Nerium oleander-Platanus orientalis forest

Riparian forests on the Bencik Mountain are formed by this vegetation type ranging between 501 and 565 m. The vegetation type is found on the limeless brown soil formed by the phyllite rock. It generally prefers southern aspects. The inclination is not high. The general cover of the vegetation type is between 60% and 70%. The vegetation type consists of three vertical layers. The tree layer cover is 45­70% and the height is 10­25 m; the shrub layer cover is 45­70% and the height is 3­6 m; the herb layer cover is 5­60%, and the height is 1 m.

Diagnostic species: Campanula lyrata subsp. lyrata, Cratae- gus monogyna subsp. monogyna, Dracunculus vulgaris, Eu- phorbia peplus var. peplus, Geranium purpureum, Hedera helix, Juncus acutus, Mentha longifolia, Micromeria graeca subsp. graeca, Muscari comosum, Myrtus communis subsp. communis, Nerium oleander, Plantago lanceolata, Platanus orientalis, Prunella vulgaris, Viola odorata

Constant species: Asparagus acutifolius, Briza maxima, Campanula lyrata subsp. lyrata, Crataegus monogyna subsp. monogyna, Crepis sancta, Dactylis glomerata subsp. hispanica, Dracunculus vulgaris, Euphorbia peplus var. peplus, Ge- ranium purpureum, Hedera helix, Juncus acutus, Mentha longifolia, Micromeria graeca subsp. graeca, Muscari como- sum, Myrtus communis subsp. communis, Nerium oleander, Plantago lanceolata, Platanus orientalis, Prunella vulgaris, Sanguisorba minor subsp. muricata, Trifolium campestre, Vi- ola odorata.

Dominant species: Nerium oleander, Platanus orientalis.

Vicia lathyroides-Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana forest

This forest represents the Anatolian black pine­dominated forests in the region. It appears above 1231 m and forms the highest elevation belt of the mountain. It occurs on the brown forest soil, which is formed by the marble rock. The inclination changes between 30° and 45°.The general cover of the vegetation type is between 70% and 80%. The vegetation type consists of three vertical layers. The tree layer cover is 60­80% with the height of 15­25 m, the shrub layer cover is 5­10% with the height of 0.1­3 m, and the herb layer cover is 10­80% with the height of 0.3­0.5 m.

Diagnostic species: Galium penduliflorum, Juniperus foeti- dissima, Lamium garganicum subsp. striatum var. striatum, Origanum hypericifolium, Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana, Vi- cia lathyroides

Constant species: Anthemis cretica subsp. albida, Aubrieta deltoidea, Doronicum orientale, Galium pendulifolium, Ju- niperus foetidissima, Lamium garganicum subsp. striatum var. striatum, Milium pedicellare, Origanum hypericifolium, Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana, Poa bulbosa, Quercus cocci- fera, Veronica cymbalaria, Vicia lathyroides.

Dominant species: Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana.

Aegilops triuncialis-Clypeola jonthlaspi regressive successional stage

Aegilops triuncialis­Clypeola jonthlaspi regressive successional stage has developed around 1299­1396 m. The vegetation type is located on brown forest soil, which consists of marble rocks found in the Fire Tower area, Buruncuk Hill, and their surroundings in the area. The inclination changes between5° and 45°. It can be found at almost all kind of aspects. The general coverage of this vegetation type is 60­90%: (a) tree layer, 3­10%, a height of 0­0.1 m; (b) shrub layer, 5­90%, a height of 0.1­2 m; (c) herb layer, 50­90 %, a height of 0.2­0.5 m. Q. coccifera, one of the most characteristic species of macchia vegetation in the region often occurs as dominant in this community. Although Q. cocci- fera represents reduced distribution and does not appear through all distribution of the vegetation type, its local dominancy may be an indication of the regression and successional process of the Aegilops triuncialis­Clypeola jonthlaspi regressive successional stage.

Diagnostic species: Aegilops triuncialis, Anchusa hybrida, Buglossoides arvensis, Centaurea cadmea, Centaurea urvillei, Clypeola jonthlaspi, Cyanus segetum, Erodium cicutarium, Lamium amplexicaule, Moenchia mantica, Neslia paniculata subsp. thracica, Ornithogalum armeniacum, Papaver arge- mone, Saxifraga tridactylites, Scandix iberica, Sedum album, Sedum amplexicaule, Valantia hispida, Valerianella balansae

Constant species: Aegilops triuncialis, Ajuga chamaepitys, Alyssum fulvescens var. fulvescens, Alyssum smyrnaeum, Anchusa hybrida, Anthemis cretica subsp. albida, Aubrieta deltoidea, Bromus hordeaceus subsp. hordeaceus, Buglosso- ides arvensis, Centaurea cadmea, Centaurea urvillei, Clype- ola jonthlaspi, Crepis sancta, Cyanus segetum, Erodium ci- cutarium, Lamium amplexicaule, Moenchia mantica, Myosotis ramosissima, Neslia paniculata subsp. thracica, Or- nithogalum armeniacum, Papaver argemone, Poa bulbosa, Ranunculus marginatus, Saxifraga tridactylites, Scandix ibe- rica, Sedum album, Sedum amplexicaule, Trifolium stellatum var. stellatum, Valantia hispida, Valerianella balansae, Ver- bascum pinardii.

Dominant species: Quercus coccifera.

Chorology and ordination of the vegetation units –

Horologija i ordinacija vegetacijskih jedinica

It was found that the vegetation types in the study area generally contain Mediterranean elements due to their location in the Mediterranean phytogeographic region. As the altitude increases in the communities, the effect of IranoTuranian elements is found, and in humid and shaded areas, there are Euro­Siberian elements.

Hymenocarpos circinnatus­Pinus brutia forest has a total of fifty­two taxa, containing 42.3% Mediterranean, 57.7% pluri­regional elements, and 2 LC (Least Concern) category endemics. Sideritis albiflora and Stachys cretica subsp. smyr- naea are the endemics of the community. Daphne gnidioi- des­Quercus coccifera macchia has a total of forty­six taxa, containing 43.48% Mediterranean, 4.35% Euro­Siberian,

6.52% Irano­Turanian, 45.65% pluri­regional elements, and 3 LC) category endemics. Minuartia anatolica var. anato- lica, Stachys cretica subsp. smyrnaea, and Verbascum bellum are the endemics in the community. Nerium oleander­Pla- tanus orientalis forest has a total of fourteen taxa, containing 15% Mediterranean, 5% Euro­Siberian, and 80% pluriregional elements. Vicia lathyroides­Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana forest contains 28.57% Mediterranean and 71.43% pluri­regional elements, with 2 endemics in the LC category. The endemic species in the community are Ga- lium penduliflorum and Origanum hypericifolium. Aegilops triuncialis­Clypeola jonthlaspi regressive successional stage has a total of fifty­two taxa, containing 26.92% Mediterranean, 1.92% European Siberian, 3.85% Iranian Turanian, and 67.31% pluri­regional elements, and 2 LC (Least Concern), 1 NT (Near Threatened), 1 VU (Vulnerable), and 1 CR (Critically Endangered) endemic taxa. Astragalus con- densatus and Astragalus hirsutus are in the LC category, Erysimum carium is in the CR category, Phlomis angusti- ssima is in the VU category, and Verbascum pinardii is in the NT category of endemics (Table 2).

The NMDS ordination of the relevés with the passive projection of topographical factors is seen in Figure 3. The floristic differentiation of the vegetation types and the effects of topographical factors on their differentiation are clear. The left side of the ordination is formed by the Hymenocar- pos circinnatus­Pinus brutia forest, while the Aegilops triun- cialis­Clypeola jonthlaspi regressive successional stage occurs on the right side. Daphne gnidioides­Quercus cocci- fera macchia is at the upper part of the ordination, and the lower side is formed by the vegetation types of Nerium ole- ander­Platanus orientalis and Vicia lathyroides­Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana forests. There is a clear gradient of elevation and aspect through axes 1 and 2, respectively.

Vicia lathyroides­Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana forests and Aegilops triuncialis­Clypeola jonthlaspi regressive successional stage are found in high­altitude belts of the mountain (Figures 3, 4). The Hymenocarpos circinnatus­Pinus brutia forest is found from the lower to the higher elevations. On the other hand, the communities of Daphne gnidioides­Qu- ercus coccifera macchia and Nerium oleander­Platanus ori- entalis forest are found at lower elevations.

Table 2. Distribution of taxa in phytogeographic regions in the study area. Tablica 2. Raširenost taksona u fitogeografskim regijama na području istraživanja.

Phytogeographical regions (Number / (%))

Community name

Endemic

Mediterranean

Euro Siberian

Irano Turanian

Pluri regional

Hymenocarpos circinnatus-Pinus brutia forest

2 (3.85%)

22 (42.3%)

0030 (57.7%)

Daphne gnidioides-Quercus coccifera macchia

3 (6.52%)

20 (43.48%)

2 (4.35%)3 (6.52%)21 (45.65%)

Nerium oleander-Platanus orientalis forest

0

3 (15%)

1 (5%)016 (80%)

Vicia lathyroides-Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana forest

2 (14.29%)

4 (28.57%)

0010 (71.43%)

Aegilops triuncialis-Clypeola jonthlaspi

regressive successional stage

5 (9.62%)

14 (26.92%)

1 (1.92%)2 (3.85%)35 ( 67.31%)
image5.jpeg

Figure 3. NMDS ordination of the vegetation types: 1. Hymenocarpos circinnatus-Pinus brutia forest, 2. Daphne gnidioides-Quercus coccifera macchia, 3. Nerium oleander-Platanus orientalis forest, 4. Vicia lathyroides-Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana forest, 5. Aegilops triuncialis-Clype-ola jonthlaspi regressive successional stage)

Slika 3. NMDS ordinacija vegetacijskih tipova: 1. šuma Hymenocarpos circinnatus-Pinus brutia, 2. makija Daphne gnidioides-Quercus coccifera, 3. šuma

Nerium oleander-Platanus orientalis, 4. šuma Vicia lathyroides-Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana, 5. garig Aegilops triuncialis-Clype-ola jonthlaspi

While the forests of Nerium oleander­Platanus orientalis prefer southern aspects, Vicia lathyroides­Pinus nigra subsp. pa- llasiana mostly occur in northern aspects. Other vegetation types do not show specific preferences in terms of aspect.

image6.jpegThe Nerium oleander­Platanus orientalis forest is found on low inclinations. It has been determined that other vegetation types are located on inclinations between 10° and 45°.

Figure 4. Box-whisker diagrams of topographical variables for each plant community on the Bencik Mountain.

Slika 4. Box-whisker dijagrami topografskih varijabli za pojedine biljne za- jednice na planini Bencik.

There is a clear difference between plant communities in terms of species richness and diversity (Figures 3, 5). The Vicia lathyroides­Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana forest has the least species richness among the vegetation types.The Shannon diversity index also shows that the Vicia lathyro- ides­Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana forests have low species diversity compared to the other vegetation types (Figure 5).

image7.jpeg

Figure 5. Box-whisker diagrams species richness and diversity for each vegetation type on the Bencik Mountain.

Slika 5. Box-whisker dijagrami topografskih varijabli za bogatstvo i razno- likost vrsta za svaki vegetacijski na planini Bencik.

See Figures 2 and 3 for the explanation of group numbers. – : Median,  : 25%-75%, I : Non-outlier range,  : outliers,  : extremes Oznake zajednica objašnjene su na Slikama 2. i 3. – : Medijan,  : 25 %-75 %, I : Raspon koji nije izuzetak,  : ekstremi,  : krajnosti

DISCUSSION

RASPRAVA

The vegetation of the Bencik Mountain is distributed in the meso­Mediterranean and the supra­Mediterranean belts, consisting of five different plant communities. Although topographic conditions seem to have an effect on the floristic differentiation of the communities, secondary communities have also emerged as a result of human­induced deterioration. In addition to zonal pine forests of P. brutia and

P. nigra, the riparian ecosystems in the area are characterized by the Platanus orientalis dominated forests.

The effects of elevation and aspect on floristic differentiation can be the result of climatic variation in the study area, which has also been shown in various studies carried out in Mediterranean Türkiye before (Fontaine et al. 2007). The upper belts of the study area are formed by the Vicia lathyroides­Pi- nus nigra subsp. pallasiana forest and Aegilops triuncialisClypeola jonthlaspi regressive successional stage, while the Daphne gnidioides­Quercus coccifera macchia and Nerium oleander­Platanus orientalis forests occur in the lower belts. Differently, Hymenocarpos circinnatus­Pinus brutia forest is found in mesoand supra­Mediterranean vegetation belts.

Although P. brutia (Turkish red pine) forests in Türkiye were classified under different alliances in the past, they were grouped under two alliances in recent years (Bonari et al. 2021; Kavgacı et al. 2021). While lower­elevation Turkish red pine forests are classified under the alliance Pinion brutiae, upper ones represent the alliance Styraco officina- lis­Pinion brutiae. Both alliances are placed under Pinetalia halepensis and Pinetea halepensis. In our case, since the distribution of Pinus brutia forests is in mesoand supra­Mediterranean, it is suitable to place them under Styraco offi- cinalis­Pinion brutiae.

Some plant communities of Turkish red pine at association level in SW Türkiye were identified. While some of them were invalidly published according to the ICPN rules (Theurillat et al. 2021), some show certain floristic differentiation from the community on the Bencik Mountain due to the geographical and climatic variation. Aetheorhiza­Pine- tum brutiae and Phlomido bourgaei­Pinetum brutiae, both of which were described in Marmaris province by Vural et al. (1995) and Akman et al. (1998), respectively, and Juni- pero phoeniceae­Pinetum brutiae in the Bodrum peninsula (Akman et al. 1998) are the Turkish pine forests identified in SW Türkiye. However, all these communities represent the Euand thermo­Mediterranean distributions of the species (Pinion brutiae) and are floristically different. There are also other studies from higher elevation in the surrounding regions in Southern Mediterranean Türkiye: Asparago acu- tifoli-Pinetum brutiae identified in the Finike province (Antalya) (Karaköse and Terzioğlu 2021), and Glycyrrhizo asymetricae-Pinetum brutiae, and Phlomido leucophractae-Pinetum brutiae in the Antalya Gulf (Kurt et al. 2015). Similarly, there are also other studies from the northern part of Mediterranean Türkiye (Ketenoğlu et al. 2010). All of these communities have a different floristic composition than the Turkish pine forests on the Bencik Mountain (Hymenocarpos circinnatus­Pinus brutia forest). Therefore, we decided to describe a new association of P. brutia forests on the Bencik Mountain as Hymenocarpo circinnati­Pi- netum brutiae Aytepe et Kavgacı ass. nova under the alliance Styraco officinalis­Pinion brutiae (Pinetalia halepensis and Pinetea halepensis).

Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana has a natural distribution in southern Europe and Türkiye. The Anatolian black pine (Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana) is one of the subspecies of black pine, growing naturally as a widespread mid­elevation species in the southern, western, and northern Anatolian Mountains (Akman 1995). Its distribution is placed in a gradient from the sea­effected climate area to the steppe vegetation of inner Anatolia. Anatolian black pine forests in Türkiye were grouped under two different alliances: Ci- sto laurifolii-Pinion pallasianae in western Euxine Türkiye and Adenocarpo complicati-Pinion pallasianae in Mediterranean Türkiye (Akman, 1995; Ketenoğlu et al. 2010). Phytosociological studies were carried out in Anatolian black pine forests in SW Türkiye, some of which were not published. But these studies (see Bekat 1987; Gemici 1988; Serin 1996; Kargıoğlu and Tatlı 2005; Sağlam 2007) represent the inner land distributions of Anatolian black pine in SW Türkiye and show strict floristic differentiation from the Vicia lathyroides­Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana forest on the Bencik Mountain, which is under the effect of sea climate. In addition to these studies, other community descriptions of Anatolian black pine forests were also made in other parts of Mediterranean Türkiye. However, they also have stricter floristic differentiation than the community on the Bencik Mountain due to the geographical distance and climatic variation. In this context, the Vicia lathyroides­Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana forest on the Bencik Mountain is defined as a new association: Vicio lathyroidis­Pinetum pallasianae Aytepe et Kavgacı ass. nova under Adenocarpo­Pinion pa- llasianae, Erico­Pinetalia, and Erico­Pinetea. The association represents the meso­Mediterranean Anatolian black pine forests in areas under sea climate in SW Türkiye. The poorer species richness and diversity of this vegetation type than the other vegetation types in the region can be a result of higher tree layer coverage.

Platanus orientalis (Oriental plane) establishes gallery­type forests on narrow valley bases and along rivers in almost every region of Türkiye. There are few studies on the Oriental plane in Mediterranean Türkiye (Ayaşlıgil 1987; Çinbilgel and Gökçeoğlu 2010). The Nerio oleandri­Plata- netum orientalis vegetation type, which was first identified in Albania (Kárpáti 1962), also characterizes the P. orientalis riparian forests in Anatolia. This association is placed under Platanion orientalis, Populetalia albae, and Alno glu- tinosae­Populetea albae.

Macchia is an evergreen, sclerophyllous shrubland with a more or less closed canopy structure. It is a stage of vegetation succession towards the forest, a replacement stage of climax forests, or even permanent communities on xeric sites. These stages are maintained by grazing, forest clearing, and fires. Unless the succession is interrupted, macchia develops into a sclerophyllous forest, but the species composition is nearly the same (Kavgacı et al. 2017). Macchia and sclerophyllous forests are therefore often treated together in vegetation classification (Čarni et al. 2011, 2018; Kavgacı et al. 2017).

Quercus coccifera­dominated macchia and sclerophyllous forests in Türkiye are classified under different alliances: Arbuto andrachnes­Quercion cocciferae, Ceratonia siliquaePistacion lentisci and Quercion cocciferae (Kavgacı et al. 2021). However, the upland disturbances with poorer Mediterranean species support classification under Quercion cocciferae. The Daphne gnidioides­Quercus coccifera macchia on the Bencik Mountain was classified under the alliance Quercion cocciferae of Quercetalia cocciferae and Quercetea ilicis. Such upland Quercus coccifera macchia and sclerophyllous forests were intensively subjected to phytosociological studies. However, most of them were not published, as shown in the supplementary material by Kavgacı et al. (2021). The identified associations of Quercion cocci- ferae in SW Türkiye were identified (Sağlam 2013; Karaköse and Terzioğlu 2021) and it can be seen that they include a different floristic composition than the one on the Bencik Mountain. They also appear on calcareous bedrock differently from the Daphne gnidioides­Quercus coccifera macchia since they prefer phyllite rocks. Quercus coccifera also has distributions in other parts of the Mediterranean basin beyond Türkiye, but represents a different syntaxonomical ranking (see Tsiourlis et al. 2009). Therefore, we decided to describe the Daphne gnidioides­Quercus coccifera macchia as a new association: Daphno gnidiois­Quercetum cocciferae Aytepe et Kavgacı ass. nova under Quercion cocci- ferae, Quercetalia cocciferae, and Quercetea ilicis.

Aegilops triuncialis­Clypeola jonthlaspi is a regressive successional stage and as seen by the floristic composition, Q. coccifera appears as the only dominant species in this community. However, it represents local dominancy, and the rest of the vegetation type shows open habitat character. The low distribution of Q. coccifera and the high presence of annual and ruderal plants indicate the grazing effect and degradation of upland Q. coccifera shrubland in the study area. The Q. coccifera communities are frequently subject to anthropogenic pressures such as fires, clearing, and overgrazing (Türkmen and Düzenli 2005), which result in a regressive ruderal vegetation type (Jasprica et al. 2016).

Since there is not sufficient knowledge on regressive successional stage ecosystems in the study regions and a specific assessment is required for them, a syntaxonomic classification has not been done for this vegetation type.

According to the syntaxonomical assessment carried out above, the syntaxonomical scheme is formed as follow:

Syntaxonomical scheme – Sintaksonomska shema

Pinetea halepensis Bonari et Chytrý in Bonari et al. 2021

Pinetalia halepensis Biondi, Blasi, Galdenzi, Pesaresi et Vagge 2014

Styraco officinalis­Pinion brutiae Bonari et al. 2021

Hymenocarpo circinnati­Pinetum brutiae Aytepe et Kavgacı ass. nova (Holotypus: Table 1, relevé: 2)

Quercetea ilicis Br.­Bl. ex A. Bolòs et O. de Bolòs in A. Bolòs y Vayreda 1950

Quercetalia cocciferae Zohary 1955

Quercion cocciferae Zohary 1955.

Daphno gnidiois­Quercetum cocciferae Aytepe et Kavgacı ass. nova (Holotypus: Table 1, relevé 9)

Erico­Pinetea Horvat 1959

Erico­Pinetalia Horvat 1959 nom. conserv. propos. Adenocarpo­Pinion pallasianae Quézel, Barbero et Akman 1993 Vicio lathyroidis­Pinetum pallasianae Aytepe et Kavgacı ass. nova (Holotypus: Table 1, relevé: 24)

Alno glutinosae­Populetea albae P. Fukarek et Fabijanić 1968 Populetalia albae Br.­Bl. ex Tchou 1949 nom. conserv. propos. Platanion orientalis I. Kárpáti et V. Kárpáti 1961

Nerio oleandri­Platanetum orientalis Kárpáti and Kárpáti 1961

Aegilops triuncialis­Clypeola jonthlaspi regressive successional stage

The appearance of different forest and shrubland communities in a very narrow area in the study site indicate high vegetation diversity in the region. In addition to the endemism, the occurrence of endangered species in the area also show the diversity and how vulnerable it is. The regressive successional community can be accepted as the indication of the level of vegetation degradation in the area. Therefore, the sensibility of the vegetation diversity in the region must be taken into account during forest, land management and nature conservation studies.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

IZJAVE I DEKLARACIJE

H.A.A. conceived of the idea and carried out vegetation studies; H.A.A. and A.K. performed the statistical analyses; HAA and AK wrote the manuscript. No funding was received for conducting this study. The corresponding authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

References

 

- Akman, Y., 1995. Forest Vegetation of Turkey,. TR: Ankara University Publications,; p. 450p, Ankara (in Turkish).

 

- Akman, Y., L. Kurt, E. Demiryürek, P. Quézel, F. Kurt, H. Evren, M. Kucukoduk, 1998;Les groupements a Pinus brutia sur roches ultra­basiques et calcaires, dans la région de Marmaris et Bodrum (Mugla) a l’étage thermo­méditerranéen du sudouest Anatolien (Turquie),. Ecologia Mediterranea. 24(1):63–71. (in French).

 

- Anonymous, 1998. Mugla Province Land Asset, T.C. Prime Ministry General Directorate of Rural Services Publications, Ankara. p. 132(in Turkish).

 

- Ayaşlıgil, Y., 1987. Der Köprülü Kanyon Nationalpark.seine Vegetation und ihre Beeinflussung durch den Menschen Landschaftsökologie, Landschaftsökologie Weihenstephan Freising.

 

- Bekat, L., 1987;The vegetation of Mount Barla (Eğirdir),. Doğa Türk Botanik Dergisi. 11:270305(in Turkish).

 

- Bergmeier, E., H. Walentowski, C. Güngöroglu, 2018. Turkish forest habitat types an annotated conspectus based on the EU habitats directive with suggestions for an upgrade, In: Güngöroglu C. (Ed.) , editor. Practicability of EU Natura 2000 concept in the forested areas of. Turkey, TR: Turkey Foresters’ Association,; p. 134–292. Ankara.:

 

- Bonari, G., G. F. Fernández, S. Çoban, T. Monteiro­Henriques, E. Bergmeier, Y.P. Didukh, F. Xystrakis, C. Angiolini, K. Chytrý, A.T. Acosta, E. Agrillo, J.C. Costa, J. Danihelka, S. M. Hennekens, A. Kavgacı, I. Knollova, C. S. Neto, C. Sağlam, Ž. Škvorc, et al., 2021;Classification of the Mediterranean lowland to submontane pine forest vegetation,. Appl Veg Sci. 2412544:https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12544

 

- Blassi, C, S. Burrascano, 2013. The role of plant sociology in the study and management of European forest ecosystems, iForestBiogeosciences and Forestry,. https://doi:10.3832/ifor0913­006

 

- Braun­Blanquet, J., 1932. Plant Sociology, McGraw­Hill book company,. New York, USA.:

 

- Čarni, A., N. Juvan, P. Košir, A. Marinšek, A. Paušič, U. Šilc, 2011;Plant communities in gradients,. Plant Biosystems. 145:5464https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2011.602730

 

- Čarni, A., V. Matevski, M. Kostadinovski, R. Ćušterevska, 2018;Scrub communities along a climatic gradient in the southern Balkans: maquis, pseudomaquis and shibljak.,. Plant Biosystems. 152:11651171https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2018.1435567

 

- Chytrý, M., L. Tichý, J. Holt, Z. Botta­Dukát, 2002;Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures,. Journal of Vegetation Science. 13:7990https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1654­1103.2002.tb02025.x

 

- Chytrý, M., S. M. Hennekens, B. Jiménez­Alfaro, I. Knollová, J. Dengler, F. Jansen et al., 2016;European Vegetation Archive (EVA): an integrated database of European vegetation plots,. Applied Vegetation Science. 19(1):173180https://doi. org/10.1111/avsc.12191

 

- Chytrý, M., L. Tichý, S. M. Hennekens, I. Knollová, J. A. M. Janssen, J. S. Rodwell et al., 2020;EUNIS habitat classification: Expert system, characteristic species combinations and distribution maps of European habitats,. Applied Vegetation Science. 23(4):648675https:// https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12519

 

- Çinbilgel, İ., M. Gökçeoglu, 2010;The vegetation of Altınbeşik Cavern National Park (İbradı­Akseki/Antalya­Turkey), A Synecological Study,. Spanish Journal of Rural Development. 1117(2)

 

- Çoban, S., W. Willner, 2019;Numerical classification of the forest vegetation in the Western Euxine Region of Turkey,. Phytocoenologia. 49:71106https://doi.org/10.1127/ phyto/2018/0274

 

- Davis, P. H., 1965­1982. Flora of Turkey and East aegean Islands, 1­9,. Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh;

 

- Davis, P. H., R. R. Mill, K. Tan 1988Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands,. 10. UK: Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh;

 

- Ekim, T., Koyuncu. M., Vural, M., Duman, H., Aytaç, Z., Adıgüzel, N. 2000Red Book of Turkish Plants. Publication No:. 18:(Ankara,).

 

- Fontaine, M., R. Aerts, K. Özkan, A. Mert, S. Gülsoy, H. Suel, M. Waelkens, B. Muys, 2007;Elevation and exposition rather than soil types determine communities and site suitably in Mediterranean mountain forests of southern Anatolia, Turkey,. Forest Ecology and Management. 247:1825

 

- Gemici, Y., 1988;Vegetation of Akdağ (Afyon­Denizli) and its environs,. Doğa Turkish Botanical Journal. 12:857(in Turkish).

 

- Güner, A. (ed), , editor. 2012. Turkey Plants List, ANG/Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanical Garden, İstanbul Turkey (in Turkish).

 

- IUCN, 2003Red List Categories: Version 3.1. Prepared by the IUCN Species Survival Commission. Gland, Switzerland.:

 

- Jasprica, N., Ž. Škvorc, K. Dolina, M. Ruščić, S. Kovačić, J. Franjic, 2016;Composition and ecology of the Quercus coccifera L. communities along the eastern Adriatic coast (NE Mediterranean),. Plant Biosystems. 150(6):11401155http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/11263504.2014.1001461

 

- Karaköse, M., S. Terzioğlu, 2021;Numerical classification and ordination of Finike (Antalya) Forest vegetation,. Biologia. 76:36313645https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756­021­00910­x

 

- Kargıoğlu, M., A. Tatlı, 2005;A phytosociological research on the forest vegetation of Yandağ (Isparta­Turkey),. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 8:929939

 

- Kárpáti, I., 1962;Überblick der zönologischen und ökologischen Verhältnisse der Auenwälder des Westbalkans,. Mitt Ostalp­Din Pflanzensoz Arbeit. 2:101106

 

- Kayan, İ., 1979. Geomorphology of Muğla­Yatağan Environment, Associate Professor Thesis,. Ankara University Faculty of Language History and Geography,; Ankara,:

 

- Kavgacı, A., U. Šilc, S. Başaran, A. Marinšek, M. A. Başaran, P. Košir et al., 2017;Classification of plant communities along postfire succession in Pinus brutia (Turkish red pine) stands in Antalya (Turkey),. Turkish Journal of Botany. 41:299307https://doi.org/10.3906/ bot­1609­34

 

- Kavgacı, A., N. Balpınar, H. H. Öner, M. Arslan, G. Bonari, M. Chytrý, A. Čarni, 2021;Classification of forest and shrubland vegetation in Mediterranean Turkey,. Applied Vegetation Science. 24:12589https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12589

 

- Ketenoğlu, O., G. N. Tuğ, U. Bingol, F. Geven, L. Kurt, K. Güney, 2010;Synopsis of syntaxonomy of Turkish forests,. Journal of Environmental Biology. 317180:

 

- Kurt, L., A. O. Ketenoğlu, Y. Akman, E. Özdeniz, F. Şekerciler, Bölükbaşı, B. G. Özbey, 2015;Syntaxonomic Analysis of The Preforest and Forest Vegetation in The Thermo­and Eumediterranean Zone Around Antalya Gulf. Turkey, Turk J Bot. 39:487498

 

- Meteorology General Directorate. 2018;Temperature, precipitation, humidity and wind values of Muğla Center between. 1968Muğla, 48 p, (in Turkish).

 

- Mucina, L., H. Bültmann, K. Dierßen et al., 2016. Vegetation of Europe: Hierarchical floristic classification system of vascular plant, bryophyte, lichen, and algal communities, Appl Veg Sci,. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12257

 

- Özel, N., 1996. Studies on Vegetation of Beşparmak Mountains and Dilek Peninsula,. 1st ed. İzmir Turkey: Aegean Forestry Research;

 

- Preislerova, Z., B. Jiménez­Alfaro, L. Mucina et al., 2022. Distribution maps of vegetation alliances in Europe, Applied Vegetation Science,. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1111/avsc.12642

 

- Quézel, P., M. Barbero, Y. Akman, 1992;Typification of syntaxa described in the eastern Mediterranean region (in French),. Ecologia Mediterranea. 18:8187

 

- Sağlam, C., 2007;The forest and shrub vegetation of Davras Mountain and surroundings (Isparta),. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Natural and Applied Science. 11:140157https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufbed.62447,(in Turkish).

 

- Sağlam, C., 2013;A phytosociological study of the forest, shrub, and steppe vegetation of Kızıldağ and environs (Isparta, Turkey),. Turk J Bot. 37:316335 https://doi.org/10.3906/bot­1205­46

 

- Serin, M., 1996;The vegetation of eastern part of Dedegöl (Anamas) Mountain and Kurucuova­Yeşildağ (Beyşehir­Konya) and its surroundings,. Selçuk University Faculty of Science Journal of Science. 132849:

 

- Theurillat, J­P., W. Willner, F. FernándezGonzález, H. Bültmann, Čarni, D. Gigante, L. Mucina, H. Weber, 2021;International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. (4th edition,). Appl Veg Sci. 24:12491https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12491

 

- Tichý, L., 2002;JUICE software for vegetation classification,. Journal of Vegetation Science. 13:451453

 

- Tichý, L., M. Chytrý, 2006;Statistical determination of diagnostic species for site groups of unequal size,. Journal of Vegetation Science. 17(6):809https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654­1103.2006. tb02504.x

 

- Tsiourlis, G., P. Konstantinidis, P. Xofis, 2009;Syntaxonomy and synecology of Quercus coccifera Mediterranean shrublands in Greece,. Journal of Plant Biology. 52:433447

 

- Türkmen, N., A. Düzenli, 2005;Changes in floristic composition of Quercus coccifera macchia after fire in the Çukurova region (Turkey),. Ann Bot Fenn. 42:453460

 

- Uğurlu, E., J. Roleček, E. Bergmeier, 2012;Oak woodland vegetation of Turkey a first overview based on multivariate statistics,. Applied Vegetation Science. 15:5906081111

 

- Vural, M., H. Duman, A. Güner, A. A. Dönmez, H. Şağban, 1995;The Vejetation of Köyceğiz­Dalyan (Muğla) Specially Protected Area,. Turk J Bot. 19:431476

Appendix

Table 1. Vegetation table of the Bencik Mountain. The vegetation plots are ordered according to the cluster analysis presented in Figure 2; group numbers correspond to the vegetation type numbers: 1. Hymenocarpo circinnati-Pinetum brutiae 2. Daphno gnidiois-Quercetum cocciferae 3. Nerio oleandri-Platanetum orientalis 4. Vicio lathyroidis-Pinetum pallasianae 5. Aegilops triuncialis-Clypeola jonthlaspi community.

Tablica 1. Vegetacijska tablica planine Bencik. Vegetacijske snimke poredane su prema klasterskoj analizi prikazanoj na slici 2; Brojevi skupina odgovaraju vegetacijskim tipovima: 1. Hymenocarpo circinnati-Pinetum brutiae 2. Daphno gnidiois-Quercetum cocciferae 3. Nerio oleandri-Platanetum orientalis 4. Vicio lathyroidis-Pinetum pallasianae 5. zajednica Aegilops triuncialis-Clypeola jonthlaspi.

Running number/ Tekući broj1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950
Quadrat number/ Broj kvadrata1234518192021226789101112131415161738394049502324254748262728293031323334353637414243444546
Group number/ Broj skupine11111111112222222222223333344444555555555555555555
Size of quadrat (m2)900900900900900900900900900900256256256256256256256256256256256256256256256256256900900900900900100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100
Elevation / Nadmorska visina (m)6477046507716937541094106888796766369370970667067571672671972973874856356056552950112311260132013441318139613751373137213721372138513861386139013901387129913581370138013701375
Exposure/ Orijentacija terena (o)SEWSWNSWNNWNNWENENNNENENEEESSESSSSSNWNWNWNWNWSSSSSSENNNNWNEEENNN
Inclination/ Nagib (o)4530453030453010104510101030301010553051555555303030453045453045454555510551051020305
Coverage total/ Ukupna pokrovnost (%)80 70 80 80 90 95 90 75  80 95 90 75 70 75 85 70 85 90 80 90 80 70 70 60 70 70 60 80 70 80 80 70 80 90 80 80 80 70 90 90 90 9090 70 70 60 70 80 70 80 
Coverage of trees/ Pokrovnost drveća (%)80708080859090758070------------70607030457060758070--10----------1010-3-
Height of trees/ Visina drveća (m)30302025202025252525------------25201510202525151515--0.1----------0.10.1-0.1-
Coverage of shrubs/ Pokrovnost grmlja (%)5520202525206050152590757075857085908090807050505070455551056080805--802525309070-6040605050
Height of shrubs / Visina grmlja (m)2.5111.52422.522.560.60.50.5653221.51233.53650.10.130.2150.421.50.1--0.10.10.10.20.10.2-110.50.40.5
Coverage of herbs/ Pokrovnost prizemnog rašća (%)754050403090503030952030603020503020301010106040515208070201010809080808070909085908090705070807080
Height of herbs/ Visina prizemnog rašća (m)1.111110.80.60.81111111.511.511110.7111110.50.50.50.40.30.30.40.40.30.30.20.20.20.20.30.20.20.50.50.40.30.40.6
Lat/Lat37.23237 oN37.23139 oN37.22782 oN37.23826 oN37.24452 oN37.23813 oN37.23887 oN37.23826 oN37.23593 oN37.23530 oN37.27012 oN37.27067 oN37.27054 oN37.27070 oN37.27046 oN37.26991 oN37.26555 oN37.26444 oN37.26305 oN37.26261 oN37.26284 oN37.26400 oN37.24101 oN37.23921 oN37.23818 oN37.23646 oN37.23644 oN37.24101 oN37.23921 oN37.23818 oN37.23406 oN37.23522 oN37.23646 oN37.23644 oN37.23667oN37.23670oN37.23678 oN37.23694 oN37.23710 oN37.23726 oN37.23726 oN37.23731 oN37.23744 oN37.23723 oN37.23526 oN37.23345 oN37.23398 oN37.23402 oN37.23430 oN37.23430 oN
Long/ Zemljopisna dužina28.01115 oE28.01198 oE28.01093 oE28.00049 oE28.00532 oE28.00179 oE28.00392 oE28.00523 oE28.00938 oE28.00613 oE28.10253 oE28.10037 oE28.09937 oE28.09974 oE28.10132 oE28.10193 oE28.10262 oE28.10362 oE28.10346 oE28.10268 oE28.10211 oE28.10107 oE28.04170 oE28.04069 oE28.04747 oE28.04924 oE2804944 oE28.04170 oE28.04069 oE28.04747 oE28.03702 oE28.03750 oE28.04924 oE28.04944 oE28.05014 oE28.05017 oE28.05030 oE28.05029 oE28.04932 oE28.04957 oE28.04965 oE28.04977 oE28.04988 oE28.04895 oE28.04153 oE28.03930 oE28.03853 oE28.03862 oE28.03866 oE28.03804 oE
Diagnostic species/ Dijagnostičke vrste                                                   
Pinus brutia var. brutia5455555444      
Hymenocarpos circinnatus121 1   11 1     
Crepis vesicaria21 1 222  11     
Crucianella latifolia  1 122111 1221     
Scandix australis subsp. grandiflora111 2           
Galium heldreichii111 1           
Asplenium ceterach   2 42  3      
Quercus ithaburensis subsp. macrolepis  1  222        
Pilosella piloselloides subsp. piloselloides  1  1 11       
Sanguisorba minor subsp. minor     1211       
Lathyrus aphaca var. affinis 2111   12    1 1 
Briza maxima1222 2222  1 111  
Cistus creticus2 21 2222  11111   11 
Trifolium uniflorum1211    1     2  
Dactylis glomerata subsp. hispanica111  1211  11  11  
Scorzonera elata1 1 1  1   1     
Spiranthes spiralis 122            
Centaurea cariensis subsp. maculiceps     112        
Daphne gnidioides  2    2221122   1 
Lagoecia cuminoides  1222 211  1    1 
Legousia speculum-veneris  12  2121   1    
Aegilops umbellulata    111 11  11    
Trifolium lucanicum 1   111111  11    
Styrax officinalis  2   33    11    
Caucalis platycarpos 1 11  1    111    
Euphorbia rigida2122112221221 11 1   
Securigera cretica  12 11           
Minuartia anatolica var. anatolica       1121       
Sherardia arvensis1 11 111          
Platanus orientalis    44433  
Nerium oleander21   33343  
Muscari comosum112   11111  
Euphorbia peplus var. peplus     1111 11 
Geranium purpureum    11 11 111 
Viola odorata    1 11   
Dracunculus vulgaris     2 11  
Hedera helix    211    
Myrtus communis subsp. communis1     221  
Juncus acutus      1 1  
Mentha longifolia    11     
Plantago lanceolata    1 1    
Crataegus monogyna subsp. monogyna       11  
Micromeria graeca subsp. graeca       11  
Prunella vulgaris       11  
Campanula lyrata subsp. lyrata112   11  1  
Pinus nigra subsp. pallasiana      44543 
Vicia lathyroides 12    1221 111 
Origanum hypericifolium         11 
Lamium garganicum subsp. striatum var. striatum      12    
Galium penduliflorum      21    
Juniperus foetidissima         221 
Clypeola jonthlaspi        1  1 2111111 21  
Aegilops triuncialis       1    1111 11111  1
Centaurea urvillei   2    122 2111111 1     
Ornithogalum armeniacum 1       1   111112111    
Papaver argemone           1111 111 1    
Sedum album       1 211    1     111
Scandix iberica        1 1  311133      
Valantia hispida       1 11 1       11 11
Centaurea cadmea          333 121     1  
Anchusa hybrida            11  112 1   1
Sedum amplexicaule       1   11   1  11  1 
Moenchia mantica            1 11  1 1 11 
Buglossoides arvensis      1 11 11 1    11111  
Lamium amplexicaule   1     1  1 1   11  1 11
Valerianella balansae  11    1112111   11      
Erodium cicutarium            1111 11      
Neslia paniculata subsp. thracica        111  1   1 1     
Cyanus segetum       121 1 1       1   
Saxifraga tridactylites            1 111     11 
Others                          
Poa bulbosa 1111111  11111 111121111111444111111
Trifolium stellatum var. stellatum112111122211  1 1 21111111112111111
Quercus coccifera112222322344433444444  11 45433 
Anthemis cretica subsp. albida  12  1 21 122112211322
Oryzopsis coerulescens332122112112122  1   
Crepis sancta    111 111111111111
Bromus hordeaceus subsp. hordeaceus 12 111  2  111111111 
Trifolium campestre1111121  111  11 12 
Myosotis ramosissima 221    1 1111111 
Scandix stellata  111121    11111
Geranium lucidum 12111211 1 1 1 
Bromus sterilis 11221 1212    11
Carex flacca subsp. erythrostachys 112221 12211    
Alyssum smyrnaeum   1211    111111 
Avena barbata subsp. barbata 1  1211  1  1112 
Silene odontopetala 111212111 1  
Aubrieta deltoidea      11 3211211
Galium album subsp. pycnotrichum  112 1  11211
Stachys cretica subsp. smyrnaea21  121111    1 
Torilis arvensis subsp. neglecta 1112 12111     
Ranunculus marginatus      2 11111111 
Ajuga chamaepitys      1 11111211 
Leontodon tuberosus 121 11111     
Medicago minima var. minima   11111    111 
Milium pedicellare 1111 2  111  
Sanguisorba verrucosa 111 11111     
Valerianella muricata   11  1 11111 
Cynosurus echinatus 111122   1 1  
Legousia pentagonia 2 21    1111
Asparagus acutifolius   11111 11   
Alyssum fulvescens var. fulvescens   2    211111 
Geranium molle 11 111    11 
Bromus tectorum 21  1    1111 
Verbascum pinardii      1 121112 
Microthlaspi perfoliatum  121   1 11 
Sisymbrium officinale  11    1112 
Cerastium glomeratum 1  1    1111 
Phleum exaratum subsp. exaratum   1    11111 
Trifolium boissieri  111    111 
Trigonella velutina      1 11111 
Trifolium grandiflorum 1211  1   1 
Veronica cymbalaria 2121   11  
Doronicum orientale 2111     32  
Sedum pallidum 1  112    1 
Picnomon acarna1    1111 
Cerastium brachypetalum subsp. roeseri 1     1 111 
Teucrium polium       31111
Cynodon dactylon 11  111    
Tragopogon porrifolius subsp. longirostris 1  1    121
Medicago orbicularis1 121  1   
Minuartia thymifolia       11111 
Lathyrus cicera 1 1   1 11 
Hypecoum pseudograndiflorum       11121 
Cladanthus mixtus       11111 
Holosteum umbellatum var. umbellatum       11112
Crataegus monogyna var. monogyna112    11 
Micromeria myrtifolia 21  11    
Arabis verna  212 1   
Trifolium cherleri 1111     
Ornithogalum cuspidatum       1111 
Astragalus condensatus      1 333 
Trifolium tomentosum 1  111    
Senecio vulgaris       1111 
Phlomis angustissima       1554 
Helianthemum salicifolium       1111 
Ziziphora tenuior       1111 
Colchicum cilicicum       1111 
Veronica triphyllos       1111 
Juniperus oxycedrus subsp. oxycedrus      2 222 
Gagea graeca111    1   

Other species:Erysimum carium 29: 3, 30: 3, 31: 3; Clinopodium graveolens subsp. rotundifolium 7: 2, 10: 1, 16: 1; Alyssum desertorum 27: 1, 29: 1, 32: 1; Urospermum picroides 1: 1, 3: 2, 7: 1; Astragalus hirsutus 47: 1, 45: 1, 46: 2; Ornithopus compressus 3: 1, 21: 1, 17: 1; Capsella bursa-pastoris 6: 1, 36:

2, 37: 1; Clinopodium vulgare subsp. vulgare 20: 1, 21: 1, 17: 1; Eryngium campestre 5: 1, 21: 1, 9: 1; Thymus cilicicus 26: 2, 28: 1, 30: 1; Veronica pectinata var. pectinata 5: 1, 28: 1, 30: 1; Iris purpureobractea 44: 1, 45: 1, 46: 1; Cotoneaster nummularius 44: 4, 45: 3, 46: 3; Teucrium chamaedrys 28: 1, 29: 1,

30: 1; Origanum onites 1: 3, 3: 1, 15: 1; Scorzoneroides cichoriacea 26: 1, 27: 1, 30: 1; Acantholimon acerosum 28: 1, 29: 1, 41: 1; Galium spurium subsp. ibicinum 26: 1, 27: 2, 28: 1; Colchicum burtii 32: 1, 36: 1, 37: 1; Crataegus monogyna subsp. aronia 6: 2, 10: 2, 11: 1; Onobrychis aequidentata 5: 1, 9: 1,

17: 1; Brachypodium distachyon 9: 1, 10: 1, 11: 1; Geranium pyrenaicum 44: 3, 45: 3, 46: 2; Sanguisorba minor subsp. muricata 49: 1, 50: 1, 25: 1; Catapodium rigidum subsp. rigidum var. majus 13: 1, 14: 1, 16: 1; Bellis perennis 21: 1, 17: 1, 49: 1; Torilis nodosa 38: 1, 42: 1, 43: 1; Linum strictum var. strictum

15: 1, 16: 1, 17: 1; Anagallis arvensis var. caerulea 3: 1, 19: 1, 49: 1; Pilosella piloselloides subsp. magyarica 8: 2, 9: 1; Silene gallica 21: 1, 24: 1; Limodorum abortivum 4: 1, 18: 1; Lens nigricans 41: 1, 42: 1; Medicago littoralis 31: 1, 32: 1; Orobanche crenata 1: 1, 3: 1; Biscutella Didyma 7: 2, 11: 1; Tulipa

cinnabarina subsp. toprakii 44: 1, 45: 1; Valerianella coronata 8: 1, 10: 1; Biserrula pelecinus 14: 1, 16: 1; Rhamnus oleoides subsp. graecus 1: 2, 2: 1; Sideritis albiflora 1: 2, 3: 1; Asphodelus aestivus 1: 2, 3: 1; Triticum aestivum 36: 1, 43: 1; Erica manipuliflora 19: 3, 20: 1; Crepis pulchra subsp. pulchra 43: 1,

45: 1; Trifolium phleoides 13: 1, 17: 1; Hypochaeris achyrophorus 12: 2, 13: 1; Rhagadiolus stellatus 10: 1, 39: 1; Asperula pseudoclorantha 15: 2, 16: 2; Stachys annua 29: 1, 30: 1; Rapistrum rugosum 26: 1, 27: 1; Ranunculus arvensis 44: 1, 45: 1; Teesdalia coronopifolia 44: 1, 45: 1; Taraxacum bessarabicum

subsp. bessarabicum 25: 1, 33: 1; Thymus longicaulis 41: 2, 43: 1; Genista anatolica 18: 2, 19: 2; Sonchus asper subsp. glaucescens 2: 1, 38: 1; Lolium multiflorum 16: 1, 17: 2; Tripleurospermum parviflorum 10: 1, 11: 2; Medicago arabica 11: 1, 39: 1; Medicago coronata 15: 1, 30: 1; Trifolium leucanthum

21: 1, 22: 1; Lolium temulentum var. temulentum 4: 2, 21: 1; Crateagus azarolus 18: 1, 21: 1; Ophrys oestrifera subsp. oestrifera 1: 1, 5: 1; Hordeum murinum subsp. leporinum 12: 1, 14: 1; Polycarpon tetraphyllum 49: 1; Hypericum atomarium 50: 1; Serapias parviflora 49: 1; Oenanthe pimpinelloides 50: 1;

Lactuca tuberosa 50: 1; Tetragonolobus requienii 49: 1; Milium vernale subsp. vernale 23: 2; Potentilla recta 25: 2; Ficus carica 39: 2; Sonchus oleraceus 40: 1; Anthemis pauciloba var. sieheana 49: 1; Carduus pycnocephalus subsp. albidus 39: 1; Blackstonia perfoliata subsp. serotina 50: 1; Rubus sanctus

2: 1; Rumex bucephalophorus 3: 1; Silene urvillei 26: 2; Dianthus zonatus 3: 1; Trigonella monspeliaca 13: 1; Verbascum bellum 9: 2; Geranium tuberosum 32: 1; Papaver rhoeas 13: 1; Helichrysum stoechas subsp. barrelieri 3: 1; Salvia fruticosa 12: 2; Plantago bellardii 17: 1; Raphanus raphanistrum 6: 1;

Scorzonera sublanata 14: 2; Minuartia sclerantha 41: 1; Geranium robertianum 43: 1; Bromus diandrus 41: 1; Spergula arvensis 41: 1; Lamium garganicum 42: 1; Phlomis lycia 5: 1; Lathyrus sativus 29: 1; Ornithogalum sphaerocarpum 22: 1; Phillyrea latifolia 14: 1; Petrorhagia dubia 17: 1; Aristolochia incisa 1:

1; Cephalanthera rubra 2: 1; Galium floribundum subsp. floribundum 17: 1; Cyperus longus 13: 1; Alkanna tinctoria subsp. tinctoria 1: 1; Lotus angustissimus 17: 1; Velezia rigida 13: 1; Onosma frutescens 16: 1; Orobanche ramosa 3: 1; Hypochaeris glabra 1: 1; Ranunculus chius 41: 1; Rumex tuberosus subsp.

tuberosus 6: 2; Gladiolus anatolicus 1: 1; Lens ervoides 39: 1; Crepis setosa 40: 1; Euphorbia peplus var. minima 50: 1; Astragalus spruneri 41: 2; Onopordum acanthium 43: 2; Poa pseudobulbosa 38: 1; Crepis micrantha 50: 1; Fritillaria carica 41: 1; Hordeum bulbosum 40: 1; Crocus fauseri 46: 1; Spergularia

marina 34: 2; Physocaulis nodosus 38: 1; Cardamine graeca 23: 1; Lysimachia atropurpurea 39: 1; Anagallis arvensis var. arvensis 49: 1; Iberis carica 41: 1; Stipa bromoides 49: 1; Thymus longicaulis subsp. longicaulis 44: 1; Galium verum subsp. verum 31: 1; Trigonella coerulescens 31: 1; Gaudinia fragilis 13:

1; Erodium malacoides 7: 1; Plantago lagopus 7: 1; Teucrium scordium subsp. scordium 5: 1; Sarcopoterium spinosum 1: 2; Thapsia garganica 8: 1; Trifolium angustifolium 17: 1; Stellaria media 41: 1; Crepis reuteriana 32: 1; Alyssum hirsutum 29: 1; Galanthus gracilis 27: 1; Cerastium comatum 42: 1; Pisum

sativum subsp. elatius var. elatius 28: 1; Fumana arabica 1: 1; Turgenia latifolia 3: 1

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Dr. Andraz Čarni for the comments and suggestions on the text, Prof. Dr. Ergun Kaya for the language correction, and Prof. Dr. Željko Škvorc for the Croatian translation.

STATEMENTS AND DECLARATIONS


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.