Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Kratko priopćenje

https://doi.org/10.37427/botcro-2027-002

Volatile specialised metabolites of Achillea cappadocica Hausskn. & Bornm.

Cuneyt Cirak ; The Vocational High School of Bafra, University of Ondokuz Mayıs, TR-55400 Bafra, Samsun, Türkiye *
Fatih Seyis ; Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, TR-53300 Rize, Türkiye

* Dopisni autor.


Puni tekst: engleski pdf 415 Kb

preuzimanja: 0

citiraj

Preuzmi JATS datoteku


Sažetak

Phytochemical analyses of the aerial parts of Achillea cappadocica (Asteraceae), an endemic species of Turkish flora, resulted in the identification of 36, 34 and, 31 volatile specialised metabolites (VSM) for three wild populations. Oxygenated monoterpenes, such as eucalyptol, camphor, and γ-terpineol, were detected as the main volatiles depending on the populations. This is the first report documenting the content and composition of VSM of this endemic species. Data such as this is important for identifying heterogeneous germplasms and underutilized wild species.

Ključne riječi

Achillea cappadocica; chemodiversity; wild populations; volatile specialised metabolites

Hrčak ID:

352612

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/352612

Datum izdavanja:

1.4.2027.

Posjeta: 0 *




Introduction

Achillea is a widespread genus of the Asteraceae family and includes 110-140 species growing naturally in various climatic zones of the world, especially in Southeastern Europe, Southwestern Asia, and North America (Ehrendorfer and Guo 2006). Achillea species have been used for many centuries worldwide as healing agents to treat several health problems such as painful periods, kidney disorders, anemia, epilepsy, gastrointestinal ailments, urinary tract infections, etc. (Mohammadhosseini et al. 2017). Previous reports have highlighted Achillea spp. as a rich source of various bioactive secondary metabolites, namely volatiles such as monoterpenes, diterpenes, and sesquiterpenes, as well as different kinds of phenolics such as flavonoids, caffeoylquinic acids, and their derivatives (Farhadi et al. 2020). Türkiye is the main intersection point and the largest distribution area in the world for the Achillea genus with the presence of 60 flora species, 33 of which are reported to be endemic (Semiz et al. 2022).

Achillea cappadocica Hausskn. & Bornm. is an endemic perennial herb of Turkish flora. This species, locally known as "buyucan", has been used in Turkish folk medicine as an anti-edema, emmenagogue, and gastric agent for centuries (Altundag and Ozturk 2011). A review of literature revealed only two previous reports on the chemistry and extract bioactivity of this endemic species. First, Ertaş et al. (2014) described the fatty acid composition and identified oleic, palmitic, and linoleic acids as its main components. The authors also reported that its alcoholic extracts showed moderate anticholinesterase and antimicrobial activities. More recently, Raudone et al. (2022) evaluated the comprehensive distribution patterns of phenolic compounds in its different plant parts and assessed their antioxidant activity. According to the results, considerable amounts of hydroxycinnamic acids, flavanols, and flavones were identified and quantified in its methanolic extract, and a remarkable antiradical capacity was observed. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no published report on the volatile chemistry of A. cappadocica. Thus, in this study, we present the first report documenting the content and composition of volatile secondary metabolites (VSM) of this endemic species.

Material and methods

A brief description of the plant material

The stems of Achillea cappadocica Hausskn. & Bornm. are erect, 25-50 cm, longitudinally striated to rounded-angular, frequently with an upturned pubescent. The upper leaves are green, sparsely pilose, 1-3 pinnate and heteromorphic while the basal leaves have short petioles, are oblong-linear, 7-10 x 1.5-2 cm, 3-pinnatipartite. Capitula are 50-150 or more, corymbs 4.5-12 cm wide, the peduncle 4-8 mm. The ligulate flowers are 4-7, golden yellow, 1.5 mm; the tubular flowers 20-40 (Davis 1988) (Fig. 1). Its habitats are dry slopes, steppes and crop fields at high elevations (1200-2100 m).

image1.jpg

Fig. 1. Phenotype of flowers (A) and leaves (B) of Achillea cappadocica, an endemic species of Turkish flora.

Sampling and identification procedures

The upper 2/3 of the flowering part, including fully opened flowers, leaves, and stems, of 30 individuals were gathered and bulked from three wild populations located in the Central and Southern parts of Türkiye from July 25 to July 30, 2023 (37°20΄ N Lat., 34°48΄ E Long., and 1186 m elevation for population 1; 38°29΄ N Lat., 34°57΄ E Long., and 1311 m elevation for population 2; 38°48΄ N Lat., 34°56΄ E Long., and 1213 m elevation for population 3). After drying them at room temperature (20 ± 2 °C), three homogenous replicates of the bulked plant material for each population were analyzed for volatile components by solid-phase microextraction (SPME) supported gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analyses as detailed in our previous work (Cirak and Seyis 2025). Botanical identification of taxa was performed by Dr. Samim Kayikci, Mustafa Kemal University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Biology, Türkiye. Voucher specimens were deposited in the herbarium of Ondokuz Mayis University, Vocational High School of Bafra (BMYO # 212, 213, and 214 for the populations 1, 2, and 3, respectively).

Sample preparation and analysis of the volatile specialised metabolite composition

Sample preparation and analysis of the volatile specialised metabolite composition were performed according to Aykutlu et al. (2025). The instrumental system used for the analysis comprised a Shimadzu GC-2010 Plus gas chromatograph, a QP2020 mass spectrometer, and a multifunctional autosampler (AOC-5000 Plus) equipped with a solid-phase microextraction (SPME) module and a split/splitless injection inlet.

The SPME extraction was performed using a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) fibre (1 cm × 100 μm thickness) purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Supelco, Bellefonte, USA). The fibre was preconditioned for 5 minutes at 250 °C prior to analysis and reconditioned for 10 minutes at 250 °C after each run.

For each sample, 1.0 g of plant material was placed in a 20 mL SPME glass vial, followed by the addition of 100 μL of hexane. The same procedure was applied to all samples, which were sealed with silicone/PTFE septa. Volatile compounds were extracted under optimised headspace SPME (HS-SPME) conditions, consisting of a 5-min equilibration period and a 15-min extraction period at 100 °C with an agitation speed of 500 rpm. Analytes were desorbed for 1 minute in the GC injection port at 250 °C using a straight Ultra Inert SPME liner operating in split mode. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate.

All analyses were conducted using a Shimadzu GC-2010 Plus gas chromatograph coupled with a QP2020 mass selective detector. Separation was carried out using a Rtx-5MS low-bleed capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm; Restek, USA). Helium served as the carrier gas at a constant pressure of 80 kPa. The oven temperature program was optimised as follows: an initial temperature of 40°C (held for 2 min), increased to 250 °C at a rate of 4 °C/min, and held at 250 °C for 3 min, resulting in a total run time of 55 min. The interface and ion source temperatures were set at 250 °C and 200 °C, respectively. Electron ionization (EI) was conducted at 70 eV with an m/z scan range of 40–500 and a scan speed of 1666 u/sec.

Data acquisition and processing were carried out using GCMS solution software (Shimadzu, Japan). Compound identification was performed by comparing mass spectra to the Wiley FFNSC 3rd Edition Library (Mass Spectra of Flavours and Fragrances of Natural and Synthetic Compounds) and by matching calculated retention indices (RIs) with those listed in the FFNSC 3rd Edition Library, the NIST Chemistry WebBook (SRD 69), and the PubChem database.

Data analysis

Data for VSM contents of the bulked plant material for each population were subjected to ANOVA and significant differences among mean values were tested with the least significant difference test (P < 0.01) by using XLSTAT 2020 statistical software. The standard deviations of the mean values of quantified volatiles for each population were also calculated. Mean values of the chemical contents were normalised using x’= √𝑥 + 1 transformation before conducting ANOVA, when necessary, because some chemicals were not detected in several cases.

Results and discussion

The results of phytochemical analyses revealed qualitatively and quantitatively different VSM profiles for the investigated populations, which were mostly dominated by oxygenated monoterpenes. A total of 36, 34, and 31 components were quantified for populations 1, 2, and 3 respectively, which represent 100% of VSM content (Tab. 1). Among the quantified volatiles, eucalyptol (1,8-cineole) (40.40%), camphor (10.10%), and α-terpinyl acetate (13.91%) were recognised as the main ingredients for population 1, followed by heptylidene acetone (6.64%) and isoborneol (5.19%).

Tab. 1. The volatile composition and percentage of each component in three wild populations of the Turkish flora Achillea cappadocica. RI - Kovats Retention Index. Values are a mean of three replicates ± standard deviation and the values that are followed by different small letters in each row are significantly different (P < 0.01) according to the least significant difference test.

No. Compounds RI Populations
123
Monoterpene Hydrocarbons
1α-Pinene9311.02±0.01a0.44±0.002b-
2Camphene9450.57±0.003b0.97±0.0017a-
3β-Pinene9750.76±0.005--
4α-Phellandrene1005--0.25±0.002
5α-Terpinene1016-0.94±0.0015a0.99±0.006a
6Limonene1026-0.32±0.0042-
7γ-Terpinene10590.49±0.0036--
8Terpinolene10850.34±0.01--
9p-Cymene10904.23±0.002b6.71±0.02a3.92±0.0012b
Total 7.41 9.28 5.16
Oxygenated monoterpenes
101,4-Cineole10170.78±0.0038c1.14±0.005b8.37±0.005a
11Eucalyptol (1,8 cineole)102940.40±0.07a4.760±0.0013b4.70±0.036b
12Trans sabinene hydrate10970.69±0.0074--
132-Isopropyl-5-methyl-hex-2-enal11041.07±0.006c1.75±0.002b3.91±0.0053a
14β-Thujone11051.01±0.0001--
15Rose oxide1112--0.44±0.002
16Trans pinocarveol1139--0.39±0.01
17Trans-p-menth-2-en-1-ol11400.80±0.02a0.36±0.01c0.53±0.05b
18Camphor114210.10±0.015b25.84±0.002a2.49±0.0095c
19Pinocarvone11630.48±0.01a-0.29±0.0076b
20Verbenol1164-0.33±0.003-
21Isoborneol11665.19±0.005a0.49±0.0006b0.34±0.009b
22Terpinen-4-ol11781.18±0.001--
23Cymen-8-ol11820.27±0.004--
24p-Cymen-8-ol11850.28±0.003--
25α-Terpineol11902.55±0.0755a0.30±0.0064b-
26Myrtenal11970.40±0.05--
27γ-Terpineol1200-28.52±0.001b39.21±0.05a
28Safranal12010.68±0.05--
29Verbenone1224--0.50±0.012
30Pulegone12400.42±0.0036--
31Carvone1246-0.32±0.005-
32Phellandral12620.57±0.0153a0.52±0.002a-
33α-Terpinyl formate13010.42±0.005b0.89±0.0029a-
Total 67.19 65.22 61.17
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons
34α-Cedrene1418-0.28±0.01-
35Germacrene D1479--0.34±0.0055
Total - 0.28 0.34
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes
36Dehydro-sesquicineole1466--1.93±0.01
37Nerolidol15640.29±0.015--
38Caryophyllene oxide15870.58±0.005b1.47±0.01a0.24±0.0055c
39Viridiflorol1614-2.27±0.005-
40β-Eudesmol16570.91±0.0029a0.87±0.007a-
41α-Bisabolol16880.29±0.02--
42α-Bisabolone oxide A1686-0.25±0.01-
Total 2.07 4.86 2.17
Alkanes, alkenes, alkynes, arenes
43Docosane2200--0.26±0.01
Total -- 0.26
Alcohols, ketones, aldehydes, furans
44Yomogi alcohol1001-12.47±0.005b17.75±0.0087a
45Allyl caproate1066-0.30±0.0153b1.20±0.02a
46Ethyl butyl ketone1078--0.98±0.01
473,4-Dimethyl-1,2-cyclopentanedione1122-0.85±0.005b1.26±0.0087a
48Heptylidene acetone12596.64±0.0808a0.26±0.0046c1.87±0.01b
49Diamyl ketone1286--0.23±0.0076
50Cumin alcohol12920.24±0.001--
51Eugenol13600.39±0.0049--
52Trans carvyl propionate1469-0.33±0.0046-
53α-Terpinyl isobutyrate1480-0.27±0.0066b0.60±0.02a
54Tridec-2(E)-enal1573-0.91±0.004-
55Tetradecanal1614--0.46±0.0058
56Myristic alcohol16630.39±0.0053--
57Phytone18440.32±0.015a-0.32±0.01a
58Civetone2015-1.68±0.01
Total 7.98 15.39 26.35
Ethers, carboxylic acids, esters, others
59Isobornyl acetate12881.08±0.038a0.53±0.02b-
60Methyl 2-nonynoate13000.27±0.021--
61α-Terpinyl acetate134213.91±0.0076--
62Bornyl isovalerate1513-0.98±0.007a3.56±0.002b
63Neryl isovalerate1582-2.49±0.01-
64Methyl jasmonate1652--0.26±0.01
65Pentadecanolide1827-0.87±0.03a0.67±0.0117b
Total 15.26 4.87 4.49
Number of detected compounds 36 34 31
General total 99.91 99.90 99.94

Contrary to population 1, populations 2 and 3 had somewhat similar VSM profiles and both were characterised by the dominance of γ-terpineol (28.52 and 39.21% for populations 2 and 3, respectively) and yomogi alcohol (12.47 and 17.75% for populations 2 and 3, respectively), which were not detected in population 1. It is interesting to note that α-terpinyl acetate, one of the main volatiles of population 1, was also absent in populations 2 and 3, indicating the presence of different kinds of chemotypes among wild populations of this endemic species. Camphor and eucalyptol (1,8-cineole) were previously designated as the main volatile constituents of many Achillea species of Turkish origin (Turkmenoğlu et al. 2015, Başer 2016, Yener et al. 2020), as can also be observed in the present study. Along with these chemicals, several others, such as borneol, isoborneol, α- and β-pinenes, α- and β-thujones, santolina alcohol, germacrene D, chamazulene, and spathulenol, were reported as the major VSMs of Achillea species from different localities in the world (Nemeth 2005, Radulovic et al. 2007, Mohammadhosseini et al. 2017). Many of these components were also detected in our GC-MS analyses.

The apparent difference between the VSM profiles of the tested populations may be due to environmental factors such as elevation, temperature, UV radiation, precipitation, etc., which vary evidently with the plant’s environment. Thus, Rahimmalek et al. (2009) indicated the soil type and climatic conditions of the plant’s growing habitats as the possible reason for the remarkable intraspecific and interspecific chemical polymorphism they observed among 19 accessions of the six Iranian species of Achillea namely, A. millefolium L., A. filipendulina Lam., A. tenuifolia Lam., A. santolina L., A. biebersteinii Afan., and A. eriophora DC. Elevation, for example, was reported to significantly change the VSM profile of 16 A. millefolium populations of Italian origin and a rising altitudinal gradient resulted in the occurrence of 4β-hydroxygermacra-1(10),5-diene, germacrene D, β-eudesmol, caryophyllene and camphor chemotypes for the most well-known member of the Achillea genus (Pecetti et al. 2012). Chrysanthenone, trans-carveol, linalool, neoiso-dihy drocarveol acetate, and camphor were detected as the main volatile components depending on changing habitats among 20 Iranian populations of Achillea wilhelmsii K. Koch and the tested populations fell into five chemotypes based on their VSM profiles (Saeidi et al. 2018). Similarly, VSM profiles and the main VSM ingredients were significantly different among five populations of Turkish A. biebersteinii (Tabanca et al. 2011). Artemisia ketone, α-thujone, β-thujone, 1,8-cineole were the major VSMs of Iranian A. nobilis L. and their contents fluctuated significantly among the 22 field-grown accessions from different geographic localities (Azimi et al. 2016). Moreover, geographic isolation from other germplasms triggered the formation of local ecotypes, and over time, chemically distinct gene pools emerged (Pecetti et al. 2012). Thus, the evident chemo-diversity among the tested populations of A. cappadocica in the present study may also be due to the possible genetic differences of plant samples.

Conclusion

In this study, we report the content and composition of volatile secondary metabolites of three wild populations of A. cappadocica for the first time. The current research provides new insights into the chemical diversity of this endemic species, and data such as this is therefore important for identifying heterogeneous germplasms and underutilized wild species for medicinal and/or commercial purposes.

Author contribution statement

Cuneyt Cirak: Writing - review & editing, Visualisation, Software, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Conceptualisation. Fatih Seyis: Visualisation, Formal analysis, Data curation.

References

Altundag, E., Ozturk, M., 2011: Ethnomedicinal studies on the plant resources of east Anatolia, Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 19, 756-777.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.195

Aykutlu, Ö.A., Makbul, S., Coşkunçelebi, K., Seyis, F., 2025: Secondary volatile metabolite composition in Scorzonera pseudolanata grossh. plant parts. Plants 14(11), 1624. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14111624

Azimi, R., Sefidkon, F., Salehi, P., Monfared, A., Naderi, M., 2016: Phytochemical variation of the essential oils of different populations of Achillea nobilis L. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science 47(1), 11-20.https://doi.org/10.22059/ijhs.2016.58209

Başer, K.H.C., 2016: Essential oils of Achillea species of Turkey. Natural Volatiles and Essential Oils 3(1), 1-14.

Cirak, C., Seyis, F., 2025: Population variability of volatile secondary metabolites in Hypericum aviculariifolium subsp. depilatum var. depilatum. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 120, 104955.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2025.104955

Davis, P.H., 1988: Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.

Ehrendorfer, F., Guo, Y.P., 2006: Multidisciplinary studies on Achillea sensu lato (Compositae-Anthemideae): New data on systematics and phylogeography. Willdenowia 36(1), 69-87.https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.36.36105

Ertaş, A., Boğa, M., Haşimi, N., Yeşil, Y., Gören, A.C., Topcu, G., Kolak, U., 2014: Antioxidant, anticholinesterase, and antimicrobial activities and fatty acid constituents of Achillea cappadocica Hausskn. et Bornm. Turkish Journal of Chemistry 38(4), 592-599.https://doi.org/10.3906/kim-1305-29

Farhadi, N., Babaei, K., Farsaraei, S., Moghaddam, M., Pirbalouti, A.G., 2020: Changes in essential oil compositions, total phenol, flavonoids and antioxidant capacity of Achillea millefolium at different growth stages. Industrial Crops and Products 152, 112570.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112570

Mohammadhosseini, M., Sarker, S.D., Akbarzadeh, A., 2017: Chemical composition of the essential oils and extracts of Achillea species and their biological activities: A review. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 199, 257-315.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2017.02.010

Nemeth, E., 2005: Essential oil composition of species in the genus Achillea. Journal of Essential Oil Research 17(5), 501-512.https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2005.9698978

Pecetti, L., Tava, A., Romani, M., Cecotti, R., Mella, M., 2012: Variation in terpene and linear‐chain hydrocarbon content in yarrow (Achillea millefolium L.): germplasm from the Rhaetian Alps, Italy. Chemistry & Biodiversity 9(10), 2282-2294.https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.201200072

Radulovic, N., Zlatković, B., Palic, R., Stojanovic, G., 2007: Chemotaxonomic significance of the Balkan Achillea volatiles. Natural Product Communications 2(4), 453-474.https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X0700200417

Rahimmalek, M., Tabatabaei, B.E.S., Etemadi, N., Goli, S.A.H., Arzani, A., Zeinali, H., 2009: Essential oil variation among and within six Achillea species transferred from different ecological regions in Iran to the field conditions. Industrial Crops and Products, 29(2-3), 348-355.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.07.001

Raudone, L., Radušiene, J., Seyis, F., Yayla, F., Vilkickyte, G., Marksa, M., Ivanauskas, L., Cırak, C., 2022: Distribution of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in plant parts and populations of seven underutilized wild Achillea species. Plants 11(3), 447.https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030447

Saeidi, K., Moosavi, M., Lorigooini, Z., Maggi, F., 2018: Chemical characterization of the essential oil compositions and antioxidant activity from Iranian populations of Achillea wilhelmsii K. Koch. Industrial Crops and Products 112, 274-280.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.12.007

Semiz, G, Uysal, T, Bozkurt, M, Günal, B., 2022: A new Achillea (Asteraceae) species from southwestern Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany 46 (4), 406-415.https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-008X.2718

Tabanca, N., Demirci, B., Gürbüz, İ., Demirci, F., Becnel, J.J., Wedge, D.E., Can Başer K.H., 2011: Essential oil composition of five collections of Achillea biebersteinii from central Turkey and their antifungal and insecticidal activity. Natural Product Communications 6(5), 701-706.https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X1100600526

Turkmenoğlu, F.P., Agar, O.T., Akaydin, G., Hayran, M., Demirci, B., 2015: Characterization of volatile compounds of eleven Achillea species from Turkey and biological activities of essential oil and methanol extract of A. hamzaoglui Arabacı & Budak. Molecules 20(6), 11432-11458.https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200611432

Yener, I., Yilmaz, M.A., Olmez, O.T., Akdeniz, M., Tekin, F., Hasimi, N., Alkan, M.H., Ozturk, M., Ertas, A., 2020: A detailed biological and chemical investigation of sixteen Achillea species’ essential oils via chemometric approach. Chemistry & Biodiversity 17(3), e1900484.https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.201900484


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.