Skip to the main content

Meeting abstract

Are Our Patients in Favour of Implantoprosthetic Rehabilitation?

Pavel Kobler
Etienne Cikač


Full text: croatian pdf 68 Kb

page 251-251

downloads: 463

cite

Full text: english pdf 74 Kb

page 251-252

downloads: 497

cite


Abstract

Based on 12-year experience we can answer affirmatively. Another question is whether patients, in spite of the daily promotions in the media by some dental surgeries, are sufficiently familiarised with the realistic possibilities of such rehabilitation. If we compare data on the number of examined patients referred for construction of an implant with the number of those in whom implants had been constructed, it can be concluded that only 30% of the cases showed indication for such rehabilitation. As a number of our patients give up because of financial reasons, the duration of the procedure, or because of local and general contraindications, the aforementioned percentage is considerably smaller. In Europe today there are 253 different implantological systems on the market, and in German dental surgeries 250 000 implantations are performed each year, regardless of the fact that the public health insurance does not cover the costs of such treatment. Although we shall never be able to compare ourselves with such countries, we have to aspire to educate our students, dentists and specialists in order to enable them to define indications and participate in the various phases of such rehabilitation, and later in the maintenance of implants and prosthetic restorations. We must not give unrealistic promises to patients, and compromising solutions should be avoided, often in spite of the patient’s contrary insistence. The basis of success is in the planning and teamwork, in which the dental technician is also included. On the other hand, our patients are not sufficiently conscientious regarding the maintenance of oral cavity hygiene, and still less the habit of regular check-ups after implantoprosthetic rehabilitation. We will present several patients motivated for implantoprosthetic rehabilitation, in whom, because of different contraindications, implantation was not carried out, and the patients were supplied with classical prosthetic devices. We will also demonstrate that occasionally implantoprosthetic rehabilitation leads to good results in patients with worn out prosthetic devices and periodontopathy.

Keywords

Hrčak ID:

566

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/566

Publication date:

15.12.2005.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 2.032 *