Original scientific paper
https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well
Bojan Žalec
; University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Theology, Poljanska cesta 4, SI–1000 Ljubljana
Full text: croatian pdf 483 Kb
page 65-82
downloads: 444
cite
APA 6th Edition
Žalec, B. (2016). On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well. Synthesis philosophica, 31 (1), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
MLA 8th Edition
Žalec, Bojan. "On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well." Synthesis philosophica, vol. 31, no. 1, 2016, pp. 65-82. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
Chicago 17th Edition
Žalec, Bojan. "On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well." Synthesis philosophica 31, no. 1 (2016): 65-82. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
Harvard
Žalec, B. (2016). 'On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well', Synthesis philosophica, 31(1), pp. 65-82. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
Vancouver
Žalec B. On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well. Synthesis philosophica [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 December 22];31(1):65-82. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
IEEE
B. Žalec, "On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well", Synthesis philosophica, vol.31, no. 1, pp. 65-82, 2016. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
Full text: english pdf 483 Kb
page 65-82
downloads: 741
cite
APA 6th Edition
Žalec, B. (2016). On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well. Synthesis philosophica, 31 (1), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
MLA 8th Edition
Žalec, Bojan. "On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well." Synthesis philosophica, vol. 31, no. 1, 2016, pp. 65-82. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
Chicago 17th Edition
Žalec, Bojan. "On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well." Synthesis philosophica 31, no. 1 (2016): 65-82. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
Harvard
Žalec, B. (2016). 'On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well', Synthesis philosophica, 31(1), pp. 65-82. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
Vancouver
Žalec B. On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well. Synthesis philosophica [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 December 22];31(1):65-82. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
IEEE
B. Žalec, "On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well", Synthesis philosophica, vol.31, no. 1, pp. 65-82, 2016. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
Full text: french pdf 483 Kb
page 65-82
downloads: 381
cite
APA 6th Edition
Žalec, B. (2016). On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well. Synthesis philosophica, 31 (1), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
MLA 8th Edition
Žalec, Bojan. "On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well." Synthesis philosophica, vol. 31, no. 1, 2016, pp. 65-82. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
Chicago 17th Edition
Žalec, Bojan. "On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well." Synthesis philosophica 31, no. 1 (2016): 65-82. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
Harvard
Žalec, B. (2016). 'On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well', Synthesis philosophica, 31(1), pp. 65-82. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
Vancouver
Žalec B. On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well. Synthesis philosophica [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 December 22];31(1):65-82. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
IEEE
B. Žalec, "On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well", Synthesis philosophica, vol.31, no. 1, pp. 65-82, 2016. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
Full text: german pdf 483 Kb
page 65-82
downloads: 442
cite
APA 6th Edition
Žalec, B. (2016). On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well. Synthesis philosophica, 31 (1), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
MLA 8th Edition
Žalec, Bojan. "On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well." Synthesis philosophica, vol. 31, no. 1, 2016, pp. 65-82. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
Chicago 17th Edition
Žalec, Bojan. "On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well." Synthesis philosophica 31, no. 1 (2016): 65-82. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
Harvard
Žalec, B. (2016). 'On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well', Synthesis philosophica, 31(1), pp. 65-82. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
Vancouver
Žalec B. On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well. Synthesis philosophica [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 December 22];31(1):65-82. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
IEEE
B. Žalec, "On Why Semantic Externalism, Creationist Theism, Personalism, and Veber’s Philosophy Fit Together Very Well", Synthesis philosophica, vol.31, no. 1, pp. 65-82, 2016. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp31105
Abstract
The main theses of this paper are that semantic externalism (SE) and creationist theism (CT) are compatible, and that SE and personalism are mutually inclined. This view can be fruitfully illustrated and enriched by the use of the philosophy of France Veber (1890–1975), who was meinong’s pupil. He argued that there is a special side of our experience which he called “hitting upon reality” and which is fundamentally different from the presentation of phenomena. The author points to some parallels of the distinction between hitting upon reality and presentation on one hand and Putnam’s view on reference and representation on the other. The most important constituents of the frame of reference of this paper are the works of philosophers Robert Howell, Hilary Putnam, Tyler Burge, and France Veber. The main original contribution of this paper represents the finding that SE and personalism are mutually inclined.
Keywords
semantic externalism; creationist theism; personalism; hitting upon reality; Robert Howell; France Veber
Hrčak ID:
179894
URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/179894
Publication date:
5.9.2016.
Article data in other languages:
croatian
french
german
Visits: 4.026
*
