Skip to the main content

Review article

Conceptual metaphor in cognitive linguistics: a review

Mateusz-Milan Stanojević orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-7221-5842 ; Filozofski fakultet u Zagrebu


Full text: croatian pdf 218 Kb

page 339-371

downloads: 4.464

cite


Abstract

Although conceptual metaphor (Lakoff and Johnson 1980) is undoubtedly one of the fundamental
segments in various cognitive linguistic theories, there are still many disputes concerning its
motivation, cultural specificity, and processing. The aim of this paper is to give an overview of key
theoretical issues, unifying them into a coherent model which may be used as the basis for operationalization.
The paper deals with two major problems: the motivation of conceptual metaphors
and their dynamicity. We present an integrated approach to conceptual metaphor. On the one
hand, we recognize the dynamicity of metaphor as a cognitive mechanism of connecting two domains
of knowledge in real time. On the other hand, we do not exclude the conventionality of
certain connections, thus enabling a general conceptual and textual analysis. The duality of metaphor
is also reflected in their motivation. Rather than separating cultural motivation and embodiment,
we argue for an approach in which conceptual metaphor is seen as equally grounded in
cultural and embodied experiences which are part of central knowledge. Central knowledge is a
metonymical principle motivating conceptual metaphors within a certain community. Central knowledge
is construed by and dependent on the cultural community, constraining the scope of what
may be seen as culturally–universal or culturally–specific. Common embodied and cultural experiences
motivate the creation of similar metaphors, and divergent experiences (or different interpretations
of the same experience) cause variation. In the object vs. process debate we advocate
the middle way. On the one hand, we recognize the dynamicity of conceptual metaphors as a construal
process in real time, analyzable in terms of conceptual integration. On the other hand, we
do not reject the possible conventionality of some connections, recognizing the analytical convenience
of conceptual metaphors as static entities in conceptual and textual analysis.

Keywords

conceptual metaphor; motivation; central knowledge; conceptual integration; metaphors; cognitive linguistics

Hrčak ID:

47111

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/47111

Publication date:

16.12.2009.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 11.476 *