Skip to the main content

Professional paper

From Our Libraries:
Danko Škare (ed.)
Metrics of Scientific Journalism - Truths, Myths and Misconceptions

J. Stojanovski orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-7399-522X ; University of Zadar, Zadar, Hrvatska; Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Hrvatska


Full text: croatian pdf 1.121 Kb

page 179-186

downloads: 1.200

cite


Abstract

The evolution of the digital age has led to the development of so-called abstracting/indexing printed publications in online databases. A short survey of the four most popular databases in Croatia has been done, as Current Contents, Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar, with short history, coverage (included Croatian titles), features and possibilities of citation analysis. We discuss their strengths and weaknesses, and the importance of the efficient usage and appropriate interpretation of the data. The journal impact factor and other bibliometric measures are frequently misused to estimate the influence of individual papers and authors. Explaining potential benefits and limitations of bibliometric indicators, this article may help policymakers, librarians, administrators, and individual researchers to use the data provided by different databases more carefully and wisely in the evaluation of research.

Keywords

metrics: scientific journalism; citation analysis; online databases; impact factor

Hrčak ID:

50497

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/50497

Publication date:

6.4.2010.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 2.602 *