PRESUDA NA TEMELJU SPORAZUMA STRANAKA U HRVATSKOM PRAVU
KRITIČKA ANALIZA IZ POREDBENOPRAVNE PERSPEKTIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/13429Ključne riječi:
presuda na temelju sporazuma stranaka, konsenzualna pravda, konsenzualni postupci, sporazum o priznanju krivnje, kazneni postupak, sudska kontrolaSažetak
U ovome se radu razmatra presuda na temelju sporazuma stranaka u hrvatskom pravu, odnosno pojedini aspekti ovog sporazumnog oblika koji su u nekim prethodno provedenim istraživanjima istaknuti kao potencijalno problematični. Ti aspekti uključuju ciljeve postizanja sporazuma, težinu kaznenih djela koja su predmet sporazuma, ulogu suda, pravni položaj obrane te pravni položaj žrtve. Navedeni aspekti analiziraju se prvenstveno iz poredbenopravne perspektive, budući da su hrvatska inačica sporazuma o priznanju krivnje (plea-bargaining) i pojedini specifični oblici ovog sporazuma usvojeni u nekim drugim europskim zemljama nadahnuti istim američkim modelom. Uz američko pravo, istraživanje obuhvaća talijansko, francusko, švicarsko, njemačko i austrijsko pravo. Cilj poredbenog istraživanja jest utvrditi ima li hrvatski model ovog konsenzualnog oblika neka specifična obilježja koja se možda razlikuju od europskih poredbenopravnih rješenja te uzrokuju li upravo ta specifična obilježja teorijske i praktične probleme. Istraživanje je obuhvatilo i analizu prakse Vrhovnog suda Republike Hrvatske koja se prvenstveno odnosi na pitanje sudske kontrole sporazuma stranaka, a ta je problematika dosad izazvala najviše rasprave i u domaćoj literaturi, i u sudskoj praksi.
Reference
Albonetti, C. A., Prosecutorial Discretion: The Effects of Uncertainty, Law & Society Review, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1987, pp. 291-314.
Alschluer, A. W., The Prosecutor’s Role in Plea Bargaining, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1968, pp. 50-112.
Alschuler, A. W., Plea Bargaining and Its History, Law & Society Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1979, pp. 211-245.
Berdejó, C., Criminalizing Race: Racial Disparities in Plea Bargaining, Boston College Law Review, Vol. 59, No. 4, 2018, pp. 1187-1249.
Beulke, W., Strafprozessrecht, C.F. Müller Verlag, Heidelberg, 2010.
Bibas, S., Plea Bargaining outside the Shadow of Trial, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 117, No. 8, 2004, pp. 2464-2547.
Böckemühl, Kier, Verständigungen in Strafverfahren – Ein Plädoyer gegen die Kodifizierung einer "StPO light" in Österreich, Anwaltsblatt 2010.
Code de procédure pénale suisse, Commentaire Romand (Jeanneret, Y. ; Kuhn, A. ; Perrier Depeursinge, C. eds.), Helbing Lichtenhahn, 2019.
Damaška, M., O nekim učincima stranački oblikovanog pripremnog kaznenog postupka, Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2007, pp. 3-14.
Donatsch, Vereinbarungen im Strafprozess, in: Festschrift zum 50jährigen Bestehen der Schweizerischen Kriminalistischen Gesellschaft, Bern, 1992, pp. 159 – 177.
Fischer, G., Plea Bargaining's Triumph, The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 109, 2000, pp. 857-1086.
Hamdan, S., Absprachen im französischen Strafverfahren?, Nomos, 2018.
Hauser, Schweri, Schweizerisches Strafprozessrecht, Basel/Frankfurt, 1999.
Herrman, J., Bargaining Justice - A Bargain for German Criminal Justice?, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, vol. 53, no. 3, 1992, pp. 755-776.
Hettinger, M., Die Absprache im Strafverfahren als rechtsstaatliches Problem, JuristenZeitung, Vol. 66, No. 6, 2011, pp. 292-301.
Iontcheva Turner, J., Judicial Participation in Plea Negotiations: A Comparative View, American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2006, pp. 199-267.
Ivičević Karas, E., Consensual Justice in Croatian Criminal Procedural Law: the Need for a Systematic Approach, in „EU 2020 – Lessons from the Past and Solutions for the Future, EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series (ECLIC) – ISSUE 4, University of Josip Juraj Strossmayer Faculty of Law, Osijek, 2020, pp. 405 – 432.
Ivičević Karas, E., Puljić, D., Presuda na temelju sporazuma stranaka u hrvatskom kaznenom procesnom pravu i praksi Županijskog suda u Zagrebu, Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2013, pp. 823 – 849.
Johnson, T., Public Perceptions of Plea Bargaining, American Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2019, pp. 133-156.
Kavanaugh, J., Plea Bargaining: The Prosecutor's Perspective, Police Law Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1977, pp. 5-25.
Krapac, D., Presuda na zahtjev stranaka u stadiju istrage u hrvatskom kaznenom postupku, in: Decennium Moztanicense (ed. Pavišić, B.), Rijeka, 2008, pp. 137 – 150.
Krstulović Relija, A., Primjena kazne na zahtjev stranaka kao mehanizam konsenzualnog stranačkog upravljanja postupkom u talijanskom kaznenom procesnom pravu, Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2002, pp. 373 – 399.
Lafave, W. R., The Prosecutor’s Discretion in The United States, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1970, pp. 532-548.
McCoy, C., Plea Bargaining as Coercion: The Trial Penalty and Plea Bargaining Reform, Criminal Law Quarterly, Vol. 50, No. 1 & 2, 2005, pp. 67-107.
Mosbacher, A., The Decision of the Federal Constitutional Court of 19 March 2013 on Plea Agreements, German Law Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 5-14.
Murmann, U., Reform oder Wiederkehr? – Die gesetzliche Regelung der Absprachen im Strafverfahren, Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik, No. 10, 2009, pp. 526-538.
Papadopoulos, I., « Plaider coupable » La pratique américaine Le texte français, PUF, 2004.
Parker, J. F., Plea Bargaining, American Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1972, pp.187-209
Pizzi, W. T., Understanding Prosecutorial Discretion in the United States: The Limits of Comparative Criminal Procedure as an Instrument of Reform, Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 54, No. 5, pp. 1325-1373.
Rauxloh, R. E., Formalization of Plea Bargaining in Germany: Will the New Legislation Be Able to Square the Circle?, Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2011, pp. 296-331.
Sanna, A., Il “patteggiamento” tra prassi e novelle legislative, Wolters Kluwer CEDAM, 2018.
Simonato, M., Deposizione della vittima e giustizia penale, Wolters Kluwer CEDAM, 2014.
Tomičić, Z., Novokmet, A., Nagodbe stranaka u kaznenom postupku – dostignuća i perspektive, Pravni vjesnik, Vol. 28, No. 3-4, 2012, pp. 149 – 190.
Turudić, I., Pavelin Borzić, T., Bujas, I., Sporazum stranaka u kaznenom postupku – trgovina pravdom ili? Pravni vjesnik, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2016, pp. 121 – 153.
Viano, E. C., Plea Bargaining in the United States: A Perversion of Justice, Revue internationale de droit pénal, Vol. 83, No. 1-2, 2012, pp. 109-145.
Walker Wilson, M. J., Defense Attorney Bias and the Rush to the Plea, Kansas Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 271-325.
Weichbrodt, K., Das Konsensprinzip strafprozessualer Absprachen, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 2006.
Weigend, T., Iontcheva Turner, J., The Constitutionality of Negotiated Criminal Judgments in Germany, German Law Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 81-105.
LIST OF REGULATIONS AND ACTS
Code de procédure pénale, du 5 octobre 2007 (Etat le 1er février 2020), https://www.droit-bilingue.ch/rs/lex/2005/23/20052319-unique-en-fr.html, Accessed 7 December 2020.
Code de procedure penale, Version en vigueur au 08 décembre 2020, https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/texte_lc/LEGITEXT000006071154/ Accessed 6 December 2020.
Codice di procedura penale, Aggiornato al D.L. 17 marzo 2020, n. 18, accessible at: https://www.altalex.com/documents/codici-altalex/2014/10/30/codice-di-procedura-penale. Accessed 5 December 2020.
Criminal Procedure Act, Official Gazette 110/97, 27/98, 58/99, 112/99, 58/02, 143/02, (62/03), 178/04, 115/06.
Criminal Procedure Act, Official Gazette 152/08, 76/09, 80/11, 121/11, 91/12, 143/12, 56/13, 145/13, 152/14, 70/17, 126/19, 126/19.
Gesetz zur Regelung der Verständigung im Strafverfahren, July 29, 2009, BUNDESGESETZBLATT, Teil I, [BGBL. I].
Naputak o pregovaranju i sporazumijevanju s okrivljenikom o priznanju krivnje i sankciji, O-2/09, od 17. veljače 2010., p. 3, http://www.dorh.hr/PresudaPoSporazumu, Accessed 10 December 2020.
DECISIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA
VSRH, I Kž-Us 60/12-4 of 10 October 2012.
VSRH, I Kž 411/12-6 of 27 August 2013 and 11 March 2014.
VSRH, I Kž-Us 134/14-6 of 13 January 2015.
VSRH, I Kž-Us 109/15-4 of 29 September 2015.
VSRH, Kzz 38/16-3 of 27 September 2017.
VSRH, Kzz 2/2018-3 of 24 January 2018.
VSRH, Kzz 17/2018-5 of 8 and 9 May 2018.
VSRH, I Kž-Us 103/2019-4 of 4 September 2019.
VSRH, I Kž 545/2019-4 of 30 October 2019.
VSRH, II-4 Kr 61/2020-4 of 4 September 2020.
WEBSITE REFERENCES
Annual report and sourcebook of federal sentencing statistics https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/annual-reports-and-sourcebooks/2019/2019-Annual-Report-and-Sourcebook.pdf, p. 56. Accessed 1 November 2020.
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp. Accessed 1 November 2020.
Ivičević Karas, E., Trial Waiver Systems in Croatia, Towards a Rights-based Approach to Trial Waiver Systems, LEAP, 2019, pp. 8 – 9, accessible at: https://www.fairtrials.org/sites/default/files/publication_pdf/20190513_Trial_Waivers_Croatia_Final.pdf Accessed 4 December 2020.
Patteggiamento, https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/patteggiamento/ Accessed 5 December 2020.
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Autorska prava
Copyright (c) 2021 Elizabeta Ivičević Karas, Ante Novokmet, Igor Martinović
Ovaj rad licenciran je pod Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Autori zadržavaju autorska prava za članke objavljene u časopisu, no daju časopisu pravo prvog objavljivanja. Radove prihvaćene za objavljivanje ili već objavljene u Pravnom vjesniku Pravnog fakulteta u Osijeku autor smije objaviti u drugim publikacijama, uz napomenu da je rad već objavljen u Pravnom vjesniku.
