Conceptual Definition of the Term Experimental Architecture

Ambiguity of Terminological Attributions

Authors

  • Tonči Čerina roth i čerina d.o.o.
  • Tihomir Jukić University of Zagreb, Faculty of Architecture
  • Mojca Smode Cvitanović University of Zagreb, Faculty of Architecture

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31522/p.30.2(64).3

Keywords:

experimental architecture, futurist architecture, paper architecture, radical architecture, utopian architecture, visionary architecture

Abstract

Academic literature lacks an unambiguous term to describe architectural and urban planning projects that are borderline feasible, firmly bound to reality but simultaneously also liberated from it, representing an inevitable component of the development of architecture as a discipline. This paper analyses the most commonly used terms in literature, illustrating them with examples and setting forth logical relationships between them as well as the context within which they are positioned. At the same time, the research sets the relationship between Croatian and international experimental architectural practices.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-26

How to Cite

Čerina, T., Jukić, T. and Smode Cvitanović, M. (2022) “Conceptual Definition of the Term Experimental Architecture: Ambiguity of Terminological Attributions”, Prostor, 30(2(64), pp. 168–177. doi: 10.31522/p.30.2(64).3.

Issue

Vol. 30 No. 2(64) (2022)

Section

Scientific Subject Review

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Tonči Čerina, Tihomir Jukić, Mojca Smode Cvitanović

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 authors and journal.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

In agreeing this form, you certify that:

  1. You read the ethical codex of the PROSTOR available at journal web.
  2. You submitted work is your original work, and has not previously been published and does not include any form of plagiarism.
  3. You own copyright in the submitted work, and are therefore permitted to assign the licence to publish to PROSTOR.
  4. Your submitted work contains no violation of any existing copyright or other third party right or any material of an obscene, libellous or otherwise unlawful nature.
  5. You have obtained permission for and acknowledged the source of any illustrations, diagrams or other material included in the work of which you are not the copyright owner.
  6. You have taken due care to ensure the accuracy of the work, and that, to the best of your knowledge, there are no false statements made within it.
  7. All co-authors of this submitted work are aware of, and in agreement with, the terms of this licence and that the submitted manuscript has been approved by these authors.