Development and Assessment of a Post-Occupancy Evaluation Scale for Sustainable Office Environments
Insights from the FNN Sustainability Center
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31522/p.32.1(67).3Keywords:
green buildings, post-occupancy evaluation, sustainable architectural design, sustainable office, user satisfactionAbstract
This study explores the relationship between users and the built environment through a post-occupancy evaluation (POE) conducted at the FNN Sustainability Centre, a noteworthy sustainable building in the region. The study involved a comprehensive approach, encompassing site visits, managerial interviews, and staff surveys. To establish a robust evaluation framework, a scale was developed by analyzing pertinent literature, and indicators were identified to gauge various aspects of the building's performance. Throughout the scale development process, the SPSS data analysis program was used, and expert opinions were solicited to ensure a rigorous and comprehensive methodology. Evaluation categories included lighting, acoustics, climatic comfort and indoor air quality, use and comfort of systems, quality of space and perception, awareness of sustainability and productivity. The building emerged as a physically and psychologically conducive workplace that heightened employee awareness of sustainability. The study identified specific concerns, such as noise disturbance for open-office workers and glare-related issues, which serve as valuable feedback for potential adjustments.
References
Allen, J.G.; MacNaughton, P.; Laurent, J.G.C.; Flanigan, S.S.; Eitland, E.S.; Spengler, J.D. (2015) ‘Green Buildings and Health’, Current Environmental Health Report, 2, pp. 250-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-015-0063-y
Altensis. Available at: https://www.altensis.com/proje/fnn-surdurulebilirlik-merkezi/ [Accessed: 10 January 2024]
Arkiv. Available at: https://www.arkiv.com.tr/proje/fnn-sustainability-center/11646 [Accessed: 24 December 2023]
Asojo, A.O.; Bae, S.; Martin, C.S. (2020) ‘Postoccupancy Evaluation Study of the Impact of Daylighting and Electric Lighting in the Workplace’, LEUKOS, 16(3), pp. 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2019.1602778
Bae, S.; Martin, C.S.; Asojo, A.O. (2021) ‘Indoor Environmental Quality Factors that matter to Workplace Occupant: An 11 year Benchmark Study’, Building Research & Information, 49(4), pp. 445-459. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2020.1794777
Bakker, C.; Aries, M.; Kort, H.; Rosemann, A. (2017) ‘Occupancy-Based Lighting Control in
Open-Plan Office Spaces: A State of Art Review’, Building and Environment, 112, pp. 308- 321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.042
Baudach, T.; Kokot, K.; Lingnau, V.; Zink, K.J. (2013) ‘Einfluss von Nutzeranforderungen auf die ökonomische Bewertung von Stahl als Konstruktionswerkstoff für nachhaltige Bürogebäude, Ernst & Sohn Verlag für Architektur und technische Wissenschaften GmbH & Co. KG’, Berlin Stahlbau, 82(1), pp. 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/stab.201201641
Bortolini, R.; Forcada, N. (2021) ‘Association between Building Characteristics and Indoor Environmental Quality through Post-Occupancy Evaluation’, Energies, 14, 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061659
Bryd, H.; Rasheed, E.O. (2016) ‘The Productivity Paradox in Green Buildings’, Sustainability, 8(4), 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040347
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011) Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı - İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni,
Spss Uygulamaları ve Yorum. 15th ed. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2020) Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. 28th ed. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
Darko, A.; Chan, A.P.C.; Huo, X.; Owusu-Manu D. (2019) ‘A Scientometric Analysis and Visualization of Global Green Building Research’, Building and Environment, 149, pp. 501-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.12.059
Feige, A.; Wallbaum, H.; Janser, M.; Windlinger, L. (2013) ‘Impact of Sustainable Office
Buildings on Occupant’s Comfort and Productivity’, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 15(1), pp. 7-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-01-2013-0004
Freihoefer, K.; Guerin, D.; Martin, C.; Kim, H.; Brigham, J.K. (2015) ‘Occupants’ Satisfaction with, and Physical Readings of, Thermal, Acoustic, and Lighting Conditions of Sustainable Office Workspaces’, Indoor and Built Environment, 24(4), pp. 457-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X13514595
Frontczak, M.; Schiavon, S.; Goins, J.; Arens, E.; Zang, H.; Wargocki, P. (2012) ‘Quantitative Relationships between Occupant Satisfaction and Satisfaction Aspects of Indoor Environmental Quality and Building Design’, Indoor Air, 22(2), pp. 119-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00745.x
Geng, Y.; Ji, W.; Wang, Z.; Lin, B. (2019) ‘A Review of Operating Performance in Green Buildings: Energy Use, Indoor Environment Quality and Occupant Satisfaction’, Energy and Buildings, 183, pp. 500-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.017
Hamida, M.; Hassanain, M.A. (2020) ‘Post Occupancy Evaluation of Adaptively Reused Buildings: Case Study of an Office Building in Saudi Arabia’, Journal of Architecture, Civil Engineering, Environment, 13(1), pp. 29-40. https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2020-003
Hassanain, M.A.; Mahroos, M.S. (2023) ‘A preliminary post-occupancy evaluation of the built-environment in office buildings: a case study from Saudi Arabia’, Property Management, 41(4), pp. 564-581. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-11-2022-0089
Ildiri, N.; Bazille, H.; Lou, Y.; Hinkelman, K.; Gray, W.A.; Zuo, W. (2022) ‘Impact of WELL Certification on Occupant Satisfaction and Perceived Health, Well-Being, and Productivity: A Multi-Office Pre-Versus Post Occupancy Evaluation’, Building and Environment, 224, 109539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109539
Juan, Y.; Gao, P.; Wang, J. (2010) ‘A Hybrid Decision Support System for Sustainable Office Building Renovation and Energy Performance Improvement’, Energy and Buildings, 42, pp. 290-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.09.006
Kellert, S.R. (2005) Building for Life: Designing an Understanding the Human-Nature Connection. 1st ed. Washington: Island Press.
Kong, Z.; Utzinger, D.M.; Freihoefer, K.; Steege, T. (2018) ‘The Impact of Interior Design on Visual Discomfort Reduction: A Field Study Integrating Lighting Environments with POE Survey’, Building and Environment, 138, pp. 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.025
Leder, S.; Newsham, G.R.; Veitch, J.A.; Mancini, S.; Charles, K.E. (2016) ‘Effects of Office Environment on Employee Satisfaction: A New Analysis’, Building Research & Information, 44(1), pp. 34-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.1003176
Leitner, D.S.; Sotsek, N.C.; Santos, A.P.L. (2020) ‘Postoccupancy Evaluation in Buildings: Systematic Literature Review’, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 34(1), 03119002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001389
Li, P.; Froese, T.M.; Brager, G. (2018) ‘Post Occupancy Evaluation: State of the Art Analysis and State of the Practice Review’, Building and Environment, 133, pp. 187-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.02.024
Mahbub, A.S.; Kua, H.; Lee, S. (2010) ‘A Total Building Performance Approach to Evaluating Building Acoustics Performance’, Architectural Science Review, 53(2), pp. 213-223. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2009.0032
Messinger, M.; Baudach, T.; Breit, M.; Eisele, J.; Feldman, M.; Franz, C.; Hogger, H.; Kokot, K.; Lang, F.; Lingnau, V.; Pyschny, D.; Stroetmann, R.; Zink, K.J. (2011) ‘Nachhaltige Bürogebäude mit Stahl, Ernst & Sohn Verlag für Architektur und Technische Wissenschaften GmbH & Co. KG’, Berlin Stahlbau, 80(10), pp. 740-749. https://doi.org/10.1002/stab.201101478
Park, J.; Loftness, V.; Aziz, A. (2018) ‘Post- Occupancy Evaluation and IEQ Measurements from 64 Office Buildings: Critical Factors and Thresholds for User Satisfaction on Thermal Quality’, Buildings, 8(11), 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8110156
Park, J.; Loftness, V.; Wang, T. (2022) ‘Examining In Situ Acoustic Conditions for Enhanced Occupant Satisfaction in Contemporary Offices’, Buildings, 12(9), 1305. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091305
Preiser, W.F.E. (1995) ‘Post-Occupancy Evaluation: How to Make Buildings Work Better’, Facilities, 13(11), pp. 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632779510097787
Preiser, W.F.E.; Vischer, J.C. (2005) Assessing Building Performance, Oxford, UK: Elsevier Butterworth-Heineman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080455228
Tavşancıl, E. (2019) Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi. 6th ed. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
Thatcher, A.; Milner, K. (2012) ‘The Impact of a “Green” Building on Employees’ Physical and Psychological Wellbeing’, Work, 41, pp. 3816-3823. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0683-3816
Thatcher, A.; Milner, K. (2014) ‘Changes in Productivity, Psychological Wellbeing and Physical Wellbeing from Working in a ”Green Building’, Work, 49, pp. 381-393. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-141876
United Nations Environment Programme: UNEP, Global Status Report (2017).
United States Green Building Council LEED Rating System. Available at: https://www.usgbc.org/leed/v41 [Accessed: 15 January 2024]
Wang, N.; Adeli, H. (2014) ‘Sustainable Building Design’, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(1), pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.871330
Web of Science Core Collection. Available at: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/summary/1847a9d3-0aa0-41da-a304-20f0f-37c4b33-b6b219d1/relevance/1 [Accessed: 14 December 2023]
Zimmerman, A.; Martin, M. (2001) ‘Post Occupancy Evaluation: Benefits and Barriers’, Building Research and Information, 29(2), pp. 168-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210010016857
Zimring, C.M.; Reizenstein, J.E. (1980) ‘Post-Occupancy Evaluation: An Overview’, Environment and Behavior, 12(4), pp. 429-450. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391658012400
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Gökhan Uşma, Deniz Erdoğan Ölçer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 authors and journal.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In agreeing this form, you certify that:
- You read the ethical codex of the PROSTOR available at journal web.
- You submitted work is your original work, and has not previously been published and does not include any form of plagiarism.
- You own copyright in the submitted work, and are therefore permitted to assign the licence to publish to PROSTOR.
- Your submitted work contains no violation of any existing copyright or other third party right or any material of an obscene, libellous or otherwise unlawful nature.
- You have obtained permission for and acknowledged the source of any illustrations, diagrams or other material included in the work of which you are not the copyright owner.
- You have taken due care to ensure the accuracy of the work, and that, to the best of your knowledge, there are no false statements made within it.
- All co-authors of this submitted work are aware of, and in agreement with, the terms of this licence and that the submitted manuscript has been approved by these authors.
